- Title
- Some considerations when comparing SABAP 1 with SABAP 2 data
- Creator
- Bonnevie, Bo T
- Subject
- To be catalogued
- Date
- 2011
- Type
- text
- Type
- article
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/10962/448327
- Identifier
- vital:74722
- Identifier
- https://doi.org/10.2989/00306525.2011.603486
- Description
- Generally, one should be cautious when comparing data that have not been collected in the same manner. The data collection methods of the South African Bird Atlas Projects, SABAP 1 (Harrison et al. 1997) and SABAP 2 (in progress at the time of writing), differ both spatially and temporally. On the spatial scale SABAP 1 used predominantly quarter degree cells (15′ by 15′), whereas SABAP 2 uses pentads (5′ by 5′; one quarter-degree cell containing nine pentads). On a temporal scale SABAP 1 used one calendar month, whereas SABAP 2 is using one pentade (five days). Where possible, however, SABAP 1 used pentades post hoc for seasonality modelling (Harrison et al. 1997, pp lviii–lix). Because of, but possibly not limited to, this, caution will need to be exercised when comparing data between the two projects. It is naturally desirable to compare the data between these projects, particularly to seek long-term trends in population densities and in the potential changes in the distribution of species.
- Format
- 2 pages, pdf
- Language
- English
- Relation
- Ostrich, Bonnevie, B.T., 2011. Some considerations when comparing SABAP 1 with SABAP 2 data. Ostrich, 82(2), pp.161-162, Ostrich volume 82 number 2 161 162 2011 1727-947X
- Rights
- Publisher
- Rights
- Use of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the Taylor and Francis Online Terms and Conditions Statement (https://www.tandfonline.com/terms-and-conditions)
- Hits: 81
- Visitors: 82
- Downloads: 6
Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
View Details | SOURCE1 | Some considerations when comparing SABAP 1 with SABAP 2 data.pdf | 652 KB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details |