'Taking language issues to the people': language development in context.
- Authors: Wright, Laurence
- Date: 2002
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/${Handle} , vital:77243 , https://doi.org/10.2989/16073610209486320
- Description: This paper represents a prologue to a taxonomy of participatory language development strategies, one which argues that some re-orientation of thinking about Language Planning is needed for South Africa's linguistic 'renaissance' to make progress. The immediate institutional argument is for the creation of modestly equipped and staffed Language Development Centres easily accessible to the speech communities responsible for the maintenance and development of their languages, particularly the nine official PMLs (Previously Marginalised Languages), but also the dialects. The paper sets out to suggest why such centres may be necessary if we are serious about creating conditions in which the PMLs can be successfully developed without thoughtlessly damaging South Africa's linguistic diversity.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Wright, Laurence
- Date: 2002
- Subjects: To be catalogued
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/${Handle} , vital:77243 , https://doi.org/10.2989/16073610209486320
- Description: This paper represents a prologue to a taxonomy of participatory language development strategies, one which argues that some re-orientation of thinking about Language Planning is needed for South Africa's linguistic 'renaissance' to make progress. The immediate institutional argument is for the creation of modestly equipped and staffed Language Development Centres easily accessible to the speech communities responsible for the maintenance and development of their languages, particularly the nine official PMLs (Previously Marginalised Languages), but also the dialects. The paper sets out to suggest why such centres may be necessary if we are serious about creating conditions in which the PMLs can be successfully developed without thoughtlessly damaging South Africa's linguistic diversity.
- Full Text:
Can formal language planning link to grassroots cultural initiatives?: an informal investigation
- Authors: Wright, Laurence
- Date: 2002
- Language: English
- Type: Article
- Identifier: vital:7041 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1007381
- Description: Formal language planning is inevitably a top-down, highly technical process. Success for such planning would seem to depend on engaging productively with existing or readily developed social motivation within the society. This article reports on an informal investigation into how ordinary language practitioners and cultural workers in South Africa view the possibilities of contributing to the country’s emerging language dispensation, what they regard as their most useful possible contributions, and what they expect from the language planners and ‘government’ in support of South Africa’s Language Policy and Plan.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Wright, Laurence
- Date: 2002
- Language: English
- Type: Article
- Identifier: vital:7041 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1007381
- Description: Formal language planning is inevitably a top-down, highly technical process. Success for such planning would seem to depend on engaging productively with existing or readily developed social motivation within the society. This article reports on an informal investigation into how ordinary language practitioners and cultural workers in South Africa view the possibilities of contributing to the country’s emerging language dispensation, what they regard as their most useful possible contributions, and what they expect from the language planners and ‘government’ in support of South Africa’s Language Policy and Plan.
- Full Text:
Language as a ‘resource’ in South Africa: the economic life of language in a globalising society
- Authors: Wright, Laurence
- Date: 2002
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: vital:7035 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1007370 , https://doi.org/10.1080/10131750285310031
- Description: preprint , We need to develop a much more refined and specific understanding of what is meant when people refer to language is a ‘resource’. If something can accurately be described as a resource, then by its very nature it carries with it or attracts, at least in potential, the social motivation associated with the utilization, development or exploitation of that resource. This is strikingly true where language is the resource in question, because language is so intimately bound up with human activity. Where it exists, such social motivation can be augmented and supported so as to realize the ends of language policy. Contrastingly, where it is seen that social motivation informing a particular language situation is at odds with the intent of language policy, then either implementation must retreat and move to other arenas, other points of influence, where intervention can be more effective, or those charged with implementation must resign themselves to costly and messy efforts to force unwanted change through legal authority.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Wright, Laurence
- Date: 2002
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: vital:7035 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1007370 , https://doi.org/10.1080/10131750285310031
- Description: preprint , We need to develop a much more refined and specific understanding of what is meant when people refer to language is a ‘resource’. If something can accurately be described as a resource, then by its very nature it carries with it or attracts, at least in potential, the social motivation associated with the utilization, development or exploitation of that resource. This is strikingly true where language is the resource in question, because language is so intimately bound up with human activity. Where it exists, such social motivation can be augmented and supported so as to realize the ends of language policy. Contrastingly, where it is seen that social motivation informing a particular language situation is at odds with the intent of language policy, then either implementation must retreat and move to other arenas, other points of influence, where intervention can be more effective, or those charged with implementation must resign themselves to costly and messy efforts to force unwanted change through legal authority.
- Full Text:
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »