An Integrated Management System to reduce False Codling Moth, Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) infested citrus fruit from being packed for export
- Authors: Mac Aleer, Clint
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Cryptophlebia leucotreta -- South Africa , Cryptophlebia leucotreta -- Biological control -- South Africa , Citrus -- Diseases and pests -- Biological control -- South Africa , Insect pests -- Biological control -- South Africa , Insecticides , Citrus fruit industry -- South Africa , South Africa -- Commerce -- European Economic Community Countries
- Language: English
- Type: text , Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/92219 , vital:30691
- Description: False codling moth (FCM), Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) is indigenous to southern Africa and is an important pest of citrus in this region. As a result of its endemism to sub-Saharan Africa, several countries to which South Africa exports citrus, regulate it as a phytosanitary pest. Consequently, it is necessary to ship fruit to these markets under cold-disinfestation protocols. This has been possible, as until recently, all of these markets could be considered relatively small niche markets. The South African citrus industry exports approximately 130 million cartons of fruit (15 kg equivalent) annually. During the 2017 season, a total of 48 million cartons were exported to the European Union (EU), which is the equivalent of 41% of South Africa’s total export volume, thus making the EU South Africa’s most important export market. In 2013 the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation (EPPO) conducted a pest risk analysis (PRA) on FCM, leading to the EU declaring it an officially regulated pest for this region, effective of 1 January 2018. Citrus is regarded as a preferred non-native host of FCM and South African citrus was identified as a primary focus due to large volumes being exported to Europe. Shipping under cold disinfestation is not possible with such large volumes of fruit. Additionally, several cultivars would suffer high levels of chilling injury under such conditions. In this study, an Integrated Management System was tested with pre- and postharvest controls to test the hypothesis that pre-harvest interventions resulted in lower post-harvest infection. Thirty orchards ranging from soft citrus cultivars such as Nule and Nova Mandarins, to Navel orange cultivars such as Newhall, Palmer and Late Navel and ending with Valencia cultivars such as Midknight and Delta, were identified for this study. This system relies on pre-harvest inspections such as FCM trap counts and fruit infestation on data trees in every orchard, with associated thresholds for action or continued compliance. Inspections were conducted on a weekly basis. There was a significant relationship between the moth catches and FCM infestation for the full monitoring period, using a two-week lag period for infestation. Inspections of harvested fruit were conducted at the packhouse to determine FCM infestation. This included inspection of the fruit on delivery to the packhouse, on the packing line, and a final fruit sample taken from the packed product and inspected for FCM. The highest levels of infestation were recorded on the Navel cultivars, thus confirming that Navels cultivars are a preferred host for FCM. Significant positive relationships were recorded between FCM infestation during the last 4 weeks before harvest and the level of infestation in the fruit delivered to the packhouse and between the fruit delivered to the packhouse and in the fruit packed in a carton for export. There was a substantial reduction in infestation between the fruit delivered to the packhouse and the fruit packed in a carton for export, with certain orchards recording as much as a 93% reduction in the fruit packed in a carton, which indicated that the packhouse could effectively identify and remove FCM infested fruit. The outcome of the study is that a holistic management approach minimizes the risk of FCM in citrus fruit destined for export and therefore mitigate the risk associated with FCM.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- Authors: Mac Aleer, Clint
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Cryptophlebia leucotreta -- South Africa , Cryptophlebia leucotreta -- Biological control -- South Africa , Citrus -- Diseases and pests -- Biological control -- South Africa , Insect pests -- Biological control -- South Africa , Insecticides , Citrus fruit industry -- South Africa , South Africa -- Commerce -- European Economic Community Countries
- Language: English
- Type: text , Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/92219 , vital:30691
- Description: False codling moth (FCM), Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) is indigenous to southern Africa and is an important pest of citrus in this region. As a result of its endemism to sub-Saharan Africa, several countries to which South Africa exports citrus, regulate it as a phytosanitary pest. Consequently, it is necessary to ship fruit to these markets under cold-disinfestation protocols. This has been possible, as until recently, all of these markets could be considered relatively small niche markets. The South African citrus industry exports approximately 130 million cartons of fruit (15 kg equivalent) annually. During the 2017 season, a total of 48 million cartons were exported to the European Union (EU), which is the equivalent of 41% of South Africa’s total export volume, thus making the EU South Africa’s most important export market. In 2013 the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation (EPPO) conducted a pest risk analysis (PRA) on FCM, leading to the EU declaring it an officially regulated pest for this region, effective of 1 January 2018. Citrus is regarded as a preferred non-native host of FCM and South African citrus was identified as a primary focus due to large volumes being exported to Europe. Shipping under cold disinfestation is not possible with such large volumes of fruit. Additionally, several cultivars would suffer high levels of chilling injury under such conditions. In this study, an Integrated Management System was tested with pre- and postharvest controls to test the hypothesis that pre-harvest interventions resulted in lower post-harvest infection. Thirty orchards ranging from soft citrus cultivars such as Nule and Nova Mandarins, to Navel orange cultivars such as Newhall, Palmer and Late Navel and ending with Valencia cultivars such as Midknight and Delta, were identified for this study. This system relies on pre-harvest inspections such as FCM trap counts and fruit infestation on data trees in every orchard, with associated thresholds for action or continued compliance. Inspections were conducted on a weekly basis. There was a significant relationship between the moth catches and FCM infestation for the full monitoring period, using a two-week lag period for infestation. Inspections of harvested fruit were conducted at the packhouse to determine FCM infestation. This included inspection of the fruit on delivery to the packhouse, on the packing line, and a final fruit sample taken from the packed product and inspected for FCM. The highest levels of infestation were recorded on the Navel cultivars, thus confirming that Navels cultivars are a preferred host for FCM. Significant positive relationships were recorded between FCM infestation during the last 4 weeks before harvest and the level of infestation in the fruit delivered to the packhouse and between the fruit delivered to the packhouse and in the fruit packed in a carton for export. There was a substantial reduction in infestation between the fruit delivered to the packhouse and the fruit packed in a carton for export, with certain orchards recording as much as a 93% reduction in the fruit packed in a carton, which indicated that the packhouse could effectively identify and remove FCM infested fruit. The outcome of the study is that a holistic management approach minimizes the risk of FCM in citrus fruit destined for export and therefore mitigate the risk associated with FCM.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
The use of insecticides and cultural control for the management of soil-borne pests during plantation establishment
- Authors: Siwela, Evidence Miyelani
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Insecticides , Plant diseases Pests -- Control Pesticides
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/43446 , vital:36882
- Description: Over the past decades, the productivity of South African forestry plantations has been negatively impacted by abiotic (fire, hail, wind, frost, drought etc.) and biotic factors (pests and diseases). The biotic component of insect pests and pathogens cause significant loss to the forestry industry and this affects the productivity, financial viability and long-term sustainability of plantations. Common establishment insect pests and diseases in South Africa include the pine bark beetle (Hylastes angustatus), cutworms (Agrotis spp), white grubs (Scarabaeidae larvae), rhizina root rot (Rhizina undulata), fusarium pitch canker (Fusarium circinatum), and pine dieback (Diplodia pinea). Soil-borne pests, mainly white grubs and cutworms can contribute to high seedling mortality following the re-establishment of eucalypts and wattle. Synthetic insecticides used for their control include alpha-cypermethrin, deltamethrin, and imidacloprid. However, all these insecticides are considered highly hazardous to the environment and/or human health and can no longer be considered for use in South African plantations. A need has therefore arisen to find and screen alternative products (synthetic and/or natural), that are not only environmentally safe for use, but also effective for the control of soil-borne pests during plantation establishment. In addition, these products can then be combined with other control mechanisms (such as cultural and biological control) to form an integrated pest management strategy. To address the above, a series of research trials were implemented with the outcomes discussed below. Two trials were implemented in KwaZulu-Natal (Demagtenberg) and Mpumalanga (Klipkraal) to determine if seedling size in combination with, or without an insecticide would result in improved survival of Pinus Patula. The main factors tested were Root Plug Volume (36 cm3 versus 103 cm3), Seedling Age (Standard [smaller] versus Older [larger]), and Pesticide application (untreated versus treated). Seedling quality was assessed in terms of Shoot:Root ratio, optimum Height (Ht in cm), and root collar diameter (Rcd in mm) before planting, with tree growth variates measured at planting, and then at regular intervals. The final measurements were taken at 7 years and 2 months for Demagtenberg and 5 years and 1 month for Klipkraal. For both trials, the Root Growth Potential (RGP) and total Plant Quality Index (PQI) indicated that Root Plug Volume 36 cm3 and Seedling Age (SA)_Standard (smaller) had a better Sturdiness ratio and Shoot:Root ratio compared to that of Root Plug Volume 103 cm3 and Seedling Age (SA)_Older (larger), with these benefits translated into improved field performance. The diameter at breast height (Dbh), Basal area (BA), Stocking and Volume indicated that SA_Standard and Root Plug Volume 36 cm3 resulted in better survival and growth than that of SA_Older (larger) seedlings and Root Plug Volume 103 cm3. The application of a Pesticide resulted in improved survival and growth at Klipkraal, but not at Demagtenberg. This indicated the presence of soil-borne pests at this site. In addition, the interaction between Pesticide application and SA_Standard resulted in a significantly larger BA than all other treatments only at Klipkraal, which indicates that both improved seedling quality and pesticides contributed to improved performance. One trial was established to Eucalyptus dunnii William Dunn at Umvoti North to investigate the effectiveness of the synthetic insecticides (deltamethrin, clothianidin, imidacloprid, imidacloprid + fertilizer, imidacloprid + clothianidin + fertilizer) and two natural products (azadirachtin and potassium silicate) for the control of soil-borne pests following planting. Groundline diameter (Gld), Height (Ht) and survival were assessed over a six-month period. Despite the selection of a site known to have a high incidence of soil-borne pests, few soil-borne pest were detected on the site for the trial duration, with no treatment differences observed for any of the tree growth variates. Significant differences were observed for foliar discolouration (possible phytotoxicity), however, these results were inconclusive as majority of the affected treatments (those that survived) showed full recovery. Three-month results from 12 eucalypt trials in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa were compared to determine the benefits (including costs) of insecticides for the control of soil-borne pests. The 12 trials were selected to represent different physiographic regions, mainly within the warm temperate regions where white grubs and cutworms are likely to occur. Data for the trials were obtained from previous management research (published documents) and included six where mortality was the only variate assessed, with the Ht and Gld also assessed in the remaining six trials. There was a ≥ 2.5% increase in survival in seven of the 12 trials through the use of insecticides relative to the control, although only four of these seven were statistically significant. Of the 12 trials, the use of insecticides resulted in > 90% survival compared to the control at Mistley (93 versus 83%), Bloemendal (96 versus 62%) and Enon (burn) (96 versus 89%). At Garfield, Vulindlela, and Baynesfield, survival in both the treated and untreated treatments was below 90%, whereas both the treated and untreated treatments were above 90% at Rustig, Greenhill, Enon (slash), Umvoti, Dargle and Umvoti North. This data indicates that where soil-borne pests are present, the application of an insecticide is beneficial. Due to the costs associated with insecticide application, the challenge will be to determine which are high-risk sites that require treatment with an insecticide. Results from these trials indicate that on sites where soil-borne pests are present (and active), the application of insecticides is beneficial. However, even if present, the level of impact is less obvious, and possibly influenced by life cycle stage, site management and climate. The testing of alternative and less highly hazardous insecticides indicated the potential future use of insecticides in terms of limited seedling phytotoxicity (some of the products tested). To understand more fully the extent of their efficacy, these products would need to be re-tested again on sites where soil-borne pests are active. Optimum establishment practices, together with the planting of quality seedlings and application of an approved insecticide, will all contribute to improved survival and growth. Perhaps the biggest challenge will be the determination of soil pest activity, such that the application of pesticides can be limited to those sites where control is necessary..
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- Authors: Siwela, Evidence Miyelani
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Insecticides , Plant diseases Pests -- Control Pesticides
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/43446 , vital:36882
- Description: Over the past decades, the productivity of South African forestry plantations has been negatively impacted by abiotic (fire, hail, wind, frost, drought etc.) and biotic factors (pests and diseases). The biotic component of insect pests and pathogens cause significant loss to the forestry industry and this affects the productivity, financial viability and long-term sustainability of plantations. Common establishment insect pests and diseases in South Africa include the pine bark beetle (Hylastes angustatus), cutworms (Agrotis spp), white grubs (Scarabaeidae larvae), rhizina root rot (Rhizina undulata), fusarium pitch canker (Fusarium circinatum), and pine dieback (Diplodia pinea). Soil-borne pests, mainly white grubs and cutworms can contribute to high seedling mortality following the re-establishment of eucalypts and wattle. Synthetic insecticides used for their control include alpha-cypermethrin, deltamethrin, and imidacloprid. However, all these insecticides are considered highly hazardous to the environment and/or human health and can no longer be considered for use in South African plantations. A need has therefore arisen to find and screen alternative products (synthetic and/or natural), that are not only environmentally safe for use, but also effective for the control of soil-borne pests during plantation establishment. In addition, these products can then be combined with other control mechanisms (such as cultural and biological control) to form an integrated pest management strategy. To address the above, a series of research trials were implemented with the outcomes discussed below. Two trials were implemented in KwaZulu-Natal (Demagtenberg) and Mpumalanga (Klipkraal) to determine if seedling size in combination with, or without an insecticide would result in improved survival of Pinus Patula. The main factors tested were Root Plug Volume (36 cm3 versus 103 cm3), Seedling Age (Standard [smaller] versus Older [larger]), and Pesticide application (untreated versus treated). Seedling quality was assessed in terms of Shoot:Root ratio, optimum Height (Ht in cm), and root collar diameter (Rcd in mm) before planting, with tree growth variates measured at planting, and then at regular intervals. The final measurements were taken at 7 years and 2 months for Demagtenberg and 5 years and 1 month for Klipkraal. For both trials, the Root Growth Potential (RGP) and total Plant Quality Index (PQI) indicated that Root Plug Volume 36 cm3 and Seedling Age (SA)_Standard (smaller) had a better Sturdiness ratio and Shoot:Root ratio compared to that of Root Plug Volume 103 cm3 and Seedling Age (SA)_Older (larger), with these benefits translated into improved field performance. The diameter at breast height (Dbh), Basal area (BA), Stocking and Volume indicated that SA_Standard and Root Plug Volume 36 cm3 resulted in better survival and growth than that of SA_Older (larger) seedlings and Root Plug Volume 103 cm3. The application of a Pesticide resulted in improved survival and growth at Klipkraal, but not at Demagtenberg. This indicated the presence of soil-borne pests at this site. In addition, the interaction between Pesticide application and SA_Standard resulted in a significantly larger BA than all other treatments only at Klipkraal, which indicates that both improved seedling quality and pesticides contributed to improved performance. One trial was established to Eucalyptus dunnii William Dunn at Umvoti North to investigate the effectiveness of the synthetic insecticides (deltamethrin, clothianidin, imidacloprid, imidacloprid + fertilizer, imidacloprid + clothianidin + fertilizer) and two natural products (azadirachtin and potassium silicate) for the control of soil-borne pests following planting. Groundline diameter (Gld), Height (Ht) and survival were assessed over a six-month period. Despite the selection of a site known to have a high incidence of soil-borne pests, few soil-borne pest were detected on the site for the trial duration, with no treatment differences observed for any of the tree growth variates. Significant differences were observed for foliar discolouration (possible phytotoxicity), however, these results were inconclusive as majority of the affected treatments (those that survived) showed full recovery. Three-month results from 12 eucalypt trials in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa were compared to determine the benefits (including costs) of insecticides for the control of soil-borne pests. The 12 trials were selected to represent different physiographic regions, mainly within the warm temperate regions where white grubs and cutworms are likely to occur. Data for the trials were obtained from previous management research (published documents) and included six where mortality was the only variate assessed, with the Ht and Gld also assessed in the remaining six trials. There was a ≥ 2.5% increase in survival in seven of the 12 trials through the use of insecticides relative to the control, although only four of these seven were statistically significant. Of the 12 trials, the use of insecticides resulted in > 90% survival compared to the control at Mistley (93 versus 83%), Bloemendal (96 versus 62%) and Enon (burn) (96 versus 89%). At Garfield, Vulindlela, and Baynesfield, survival in both the treated and untreated treatments was below 90%, whereas both the treated and untreated treatments were above 90% at Rustig, Greenhill, Enon (slash), Umvoti, Dargle and Umvoti North. This data indicates that where soil-borne pests are present, the application of an insecticide is beneficial. Due to the costs associated with insecticide application, the challenge will be to determine which are high-risk sites that require treatment with an insecticide. Results from these trials indicate that on sites where soil-borne pests are present (and active), the application of insecticides is beneficial. However, even if present, the level of impact is less obvious, and possibly influenced by life cycle stage, site management and climate. The testing of alternative and less highly hazardous insecticides indicated the potential future use of insecticides in terms of limited seedling phytotoxicity (some of the products tested). To understand more fully the extent of their efficacy, these products would need to be re-tested again on sites where soil-borne pests are active. Optimum establishment practices, together with the planting of quality seedlings and application of an approved insecticide, will all contribute to improved survival and growth. Perhaps the biggest challenge will be the determination of soil pest activity, such that the application of pesticides can be limited to those sites where control is necessary..
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »