The effects of control design and working posture on strength and work output: an isokinetic investigation
- Dirkse Van Schalkwyk, Charles Joseph
- Authors: Dirkse Van Schalkwyk, Charles Joseph
- Date: 2002
- Subjects: Posture , Human engineering
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: vital:5118 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1005196 , Posture , Human engineering
- Description: he objective of the present study was to assess the isokinetic, cardiovascular and psychophysical responses of young adult males (N=30) during valve turning exercises. It aimed to evaluate the variables in relation to changes in control design and working posture. Isokinetic testing and ergonomics have not been widely linked and it was an aim of this study to show the advantages to the field of ergonomics. Furthermore, the “work-simulation” package used in the present study has not been widely exploited and it was believed that this study could thus contribute significantly to the literature. Testing was carried out using a CYBEX ® 6000 isokinetic dynamometer, a polar heart watch, an Omron M1 semi-automatic blood pressure monitor and various perceptual rating scales. Testing involved the subjects having to perform 4 maximal turning efforts in 18 different conditions. These conditions were made up by using 6 different control designs in 3 varying positions. Subjects were required to attend two sessions, each approximately one hour long, in which nine randomised conditions were tested in each session. During these sessions, isokinetic responses: peak torque (Nm), total work (J) and average power (W); cardiovascular responses: heart rate (bt.min[superscript -1]) and blood pressure (mmHg); and psychophysical responses: RPE and discomfort, were observed. The results of the tests showed that in general significant differences were encountered for isokinetic, cardiovascular and psychophysical responses in relation to changes in the control design. However, significant differences were far less evident, and in most cases non existent, in relation to changes in the spatial orientation of the control types. The essence being that operator position with respect to the control is not as crucial as the control design.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Dirkse Van Schalkwyk, Charles Joseph
- Date: 2002
- Subjects: Posture , Human engineering
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: vital:5118 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1005196 , Posture , Human engineering
- Description: he objective of the present study was to assess the isokinetic, cardiovascular and psychophysical responses of young adult males (N=30) during valve turning exercises. It aimed to evaluate the variables in relation to changes in control design and working posture. Isokinetic testing and ergonomics have not been widely linked and it was an aim of this study to show the advantages to the field of ergonomics. Furthermore, the “work-simulation” package used in the present study has not been widely exploited and it was believed that this study could thus contribute significantly to the literature. Testing was carried out using a CYBEX ® 6000 isokinetic dynamometer, a polar heart watch, an Omron M1 semi-automatic blood pressure monitor and various perceptual rating scales. Testing involved the subjects having to perform 4 maximal turning efforts in 18 different conditions. These conditions were made up by using 6 different control designs in 3 varying positions. Subjects were required to attend two sessions, each approximately one hour long, in which nine randomised conditions were tested in each session. During these sessions, isokinetic responses: peak torque (Nm), total work (J) and average power (W); cardiovascular responses: heart rate (bt.min[superscript -1]) and blood pressure (mmHg); and psychophysical responses: RPE and discomfort, were observed. The results of the tests showed that in general significant differences were encountered for isokinetic, cardiovascular and psychophysical responses in relation to changes in the control design. However, significant differences were far less evident, and in most cases non existent, in relation to changes in the spatial orientation of the control types. The essence being that operator position with respect to the control is not as crucial as the control design.
- Full Text:
Three dimensional kinetic analysis of asymmetrical lifting
- Authors: Li, Jian-Chuan
- Date: 1996
- Subjects: Lifting and carrying , Human engineering , Materials handling , Manual work
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: vital:5174 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1018240
- Description: Manual lifting is dynamic in nature and involves asymmetrical loading of the human body. This study investigated kinematic and kinetic characteristics of asymmetrical lifting in three dimensions, and then constructed a 3-D biomechanical force model of the lower back which is capable of quantifying torsional stress on the human spine. Eleven healthy adult male manual workers were recruited as subjects and lifted a 1 Okg load placed at the sagittal plane (0°) and at 30°, 60° and 90° lateral planes to the right, from 150mm and 500mm initial lift heights, respectively, to an 800mm high bench in the sagittal plane. Subjects' spinal motions and the trajectorial movements of the load in three-dimensional space were monitored simultaneously by a Lumbar Motion Monitor and a V-scope Motion Analyzer. Generally, the spinal motion factors increased as a function of increasing task asymmetry and differed (p < 0.05) between the lower (150mm) and higher (500mm) levels in the sagittal plane. In all asymmetrical conditions the motion factors showed a dramatic increase at the 500mm level compared to the increase at the 150mm level. The rates of increase in the horizontal and frontal planes were greater than those in the sagittal plane. Task asymmetry had a significant effect on the spinal kinematic parameters in the frontal plane at the two lift heights, and only at the high level (500mm) in the horizontal plane, with exception of average acceleration . Initial lift height exerted a significant effect on peak velocity and acceleration in both frontal and horizontal planes and on range of motion in the horizontal plane. Kinetic characteristics of the object being lifted in three-dimensions increased with an increase in task asymmetry. The increase was more dramatic in the lateral direction in the horizontal plane. However, motion factors in the vertical direction dominated the full range of the lift, irrespective of task asymmetry and lift height. The kinetic measures differed (p < 0.05) between the lower ( 1 50mm) and the higher (500mm) levels in the vertical direction except for average force. Task asymmetry had a significant effect on dynamic measures in the anterior-posterior direction. Both task asymmetry and lift height had a significant effect on dynamic motion factors in the lateral direction. From insights gained in the empirical study a three-dimensional biomechanical force model of the lower back was constructed based on a mechanism of muscle force re-orientation in the lumbar region. Acknowledging that the lower back is designed to be able to rotate around its longitudinal axis, the proposed model accounts for compression and shear forces and a torsional moment. The model has similar predictability to Schultz and Andersson's (1981) model when the human trunk exerts only a flexion-extension moment in the sagittal plane, but additionally predicts dramatic increases in shear forces, oblique muscle forces and torsional moment under asymmetrical lifting conditions which the Schultz-Andersson model does not. The increase rates in these forces and moment are not linearly related over task asymmetric angle.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Li, Jian-Chuan
- Date: 1996
- Subjects: Lifting and carrying , Human engineering , Materials handling , Manual work
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: vital:5174 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1018240
- Description: Manual lifting is dynamic in nature and involves asymmetrical loading of the human body. This study investigated kinematic and kinetic characteristics of asymmetrical lifting in three dimensions, and then constructed a 3-D biomechanical force model of the lower back which is capable of quantifying torsional stress on the human spine. Eleven healthy adult male manual workers were recruited as subjects and lifted a 1 Okg load placed at the sagittal plane (0°) and at 30°, 60° and 90° lateral planes to the right, from 150mm and 500mm initial lift heights, respectively, to an 800mm high bench in the sagittal plane. Subjects' spinal motions and the trajectorial movements of the load in three-dimensional space were monitored simultaneously by a Lumbar Motion Monitor and a V-scope Motion Analyzer. Generally, the spinal motion factors increased as a function of increasing task asymmetry and differed (p < 0.05) between the lower (150mm) and higher (500mm) levels in the sagittal plane. In all asymmetrical conditions the motion factors showed a dramatic increase at the 500mm level compared to the increase at the 150mm level. The rates of increase in the horizontal and frontal planes were greater than those in the sagittal plane. Task asymmetry had a significant effect on the spinal kinematic parameters in the frontal plane at the two lift heights, and only at the high level (500mm) in the horizontal plane, with exception of average acceleration . Initial lift height exerted a significant effect on peak velocity and acceleration in both frontal and horizontal planes and on range of motion in the horizontal plane. Kinetic characteristics of the object being lifted in three-dimensions increased with an increase in task asymmetry. The increase was more dramatic in the lateral direction in the horizontal plane. However, motion factors in the vertical direction dominated the full range of the lift, irrespective of task asymmetry and lift height. The kinetic measures differed (p < 0.05) between the lower ( 1 50mm) and the higher (500mm) levels in the vertical direction except for average force. Task asymmetry had a significant effect on dynamic measures in the anterior-posterior direction. Both task asymmetry and lift height had a significant effect on dynamic motion factors in the lateral direction. From insights gained in the empirical study a three-dimensional biomechanical force model of the lower back was constructed based on a mechanism of muscle force re-orientation in the lumbar region. Acknowledging that the lower back is designed to be able to rotate around its longitudinal axis, the proposed model accounts for compression and shear forces and a torsional moment. The model has similar predictability to Schultz and Andersson's (1981) model when the human trunk exerts only a flexion-extension moment in the sagittal plane, but additionally predicts dramatic increases in shear forces, oblique muscle forces and torsional moment under asymmetrical lifting conditions which the Schultz-Andersson model does not. The increase rates in these forces and moment are not linearly related over task asymmetric angle.
- Full Text:
Effects of incremented loads over preferred values on psychophysical and selected gait kinematic factor
- Authors: Manley, Peter Gwynne
- Date: 1989
- Subjects: Psychophysiology , Kinematics , Work -- Physiological aspects , Human engineering
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MA
- Identifier: vital:5160 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1015734
- Description: This study investigated the effects of incremented loads greater than maximal acceptable loads on selected locomotor kinematic and psychophysical variables for four different hand-held load-carriage methods. Ten male and ten female subjects, between the ages of 18 and 30, participated in four experimental sessions. Data collection involved obtaining selected anthropometric, strength, maximal load and preferred load, gait kinematic, and psychophysical values. The anthropometric, strength and load capacity variables enabled absolute and morphology normalised sex-based comparisons to be made. The kinematic and psychophysical parameters were used to quantify any changes from two sets of baseline values,"unloaded" and "maximal acceptable load" values, when loads were increased and carrying methods changed. Statistical analysis revealed that males were taller, heavier and stronger than females (p<0.05). Males chose significantly greater maximal acceptable loads and absolute maximal loads than females when expressed in their absolute or relative terms. Preferred walking speeds were not significantly different for unloaded or loaded conditions, although males walked significantly faster in absolute terms (but not in relative terms) than females. Different load carrying methods and incremented loads brought. about significant changes to several of the kinematic parameters investigated. Finally, ratings of perceived exertion, as well as the number of exertion sites, were seen to increase significantly as load increased. These values were not, however, significantly affected by differences in load carriage method.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Manley, Peter Gwynne
- Date: 1989
- Subjects: Psychophysiology , Kinematics , Work -- Physiological aspects , Human engineering
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MA
- Identifier: vital:5160 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1015734
- Description: This study investigated the effects of incremented loads greater than maximal acceptable loads on selected locomotor kinematic and psychophysical variables for four different hand-held load-carriage methods. Ten male and ten female subjects, between the ages of 18 and 30, participated in four experimental sessions. Data collection involved obtaining selected anthropometric, strength, maximal load and preferred load, gait kinematic, and psychophysical values. The anthropometric, strength and load capacity variables enabled absolute and morphology normalised sex-based comparisons to be made. The kinematic and psychophysical parameters were used to quantify any changes from two sets of baseline values,"unloaded" and "maximal acceptable load" values, when loads were increased and carrying methods changed. Statistical analysis revealed that males were taller, heavier and stronger than females (p<0.05). Males chose significantly greater maximal acceptable loads and absolute maximal loads than females when expressed in their absolute or relative terms. Preferred walking speeds were not significantly different for unloaded or loaded conditions, although males walked significantly faster in absolute terms (but not in relative terms) than females. Different load carrying methods and incremented loads brought. about significant changes to several of the kinematic parameters investigated. Finally, ratings of perceived exertion, as well as the number of exertion sites, were seen to increase significantly as load increased. These values were not, however, significantly affected by differences in load carriage method.
- Full Text:
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »