The implementation of a push-pull programme for the control of Eldana saccharina (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in sugarcane in the coastal regions of Kwazulu-Natal, South Africa
- Authors: Mulcahy, Megan Marie
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Pyralidae -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal , Pests -- Integrated control , Sugarcane -- Diseases and pests -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal , Stem borers -- Effect of habitat modification on -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal , Insect-plant relationships -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal
- Language: English
- Type: text , Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/63290 , vital:28390
- Description: Eldana saccharina, an indigenous lepidopteran stemborer, is considered the most damaging pest of sugarcane in South Africa. Researchers have advocated the use of an area-wide integrated pest management (AW-IPM) programme as a means of improving the control of this pest. A push-pull strategy was developed as a component of this AW-IPM approach. The push-pull strategy in sugarcane is a habitat management method of pest control that uses plants that are both repellent (Melinis Minutiflora) and attractive (Cyperus dives, Cyperus papyrus and Bt-maize) to E. saccharina. Previous research into push-pull has shown that this strategy is an effective tool for the control of E. saccharina. Push-pull has been implemented successfully in the Midlands North sugarcane growing region of KwaZulu-Natal (KZN), South Africa. Despite the proven efficacy of push-pull, very little push-pull research has been conducted in the coastal sugarcane growing regions of KZN, and adoption of this technology has been poor in these regions. Therefore, the aim of this research was to facilitate the implementation of push-pull for the management of E. saccharina in sugarcane in the coastal regions of KZN. This was done by focussing on on-farm field trials and farmer participatory research. On-farm push-pull field trials were conducted on five model farms in the North and South Coast sugarcane growing regions of KZN. High levels of E. saccharina were recorded during this study. The push-pull treatment sites showed a significant reduction of E. saccharina damage on four of the five farms used in the study. Mean percentage of stalks damaged decreased by up to 50 % in the presence of the repellent grass species, M. minutiflora. The number of E. saccharina found per 100 stalks also decreased significantly at these farms. The farm which did not show a significant reduction in E. saccharina populations or damage had low numbers of this pest in the sugarcane throughout the experiment. This demonstrates that push-pull is more effective in areas that have high levels of E. saccharina. Stem borer surveys in wetlands on sugarcane farms revealed that high numbers of E. saccharina were found within the pull plants, C. papyrus and C. dives, in comparison to the push-pull sites. This verifies that the pull plants do work efficiently to attract E. saccharina away from sugarcane. Additionally, eight parasitoids emerged from E. saccharina larvae collected in wetland sedges. The beneficial roles that push-pull plants play in attracting and maintaining natural enemies in the agroecosystem are discussed, and these findings further demonstrate the important ecosystem, and pest management services that wetlands provide on sugarcane farms. The success of the push-pull trials in this study show that this technology can be an effective tool for controlling E. saccharina in the coastal sugarcane growing regions. The timing of the planting of push-pull plants was shown to play a role in the efficacy of this technology. The study also confirmed that push-pull should be used as a component of AW-IPM in conjunction with good crop management practices. Surveys were undertaken to determine large-scale sugarcane growers' (LSGs) knowledge and perceptions of E. saccharina and other pests. Research regarding the farmers' perceptions of push- pull was also conducted to better understand the drivers and barriers to adoption of push-pull, and other new technologies. The surveys found that large-scale farmers in the coastal regions suffer from high infestations of E. saccharina. As such there is scope for the introduction of new pest management practices such as push-pull in this area. Farmers also demonstrated a good basic knowledge of E. saccharina and IPM. However, LSGs had a poor understanding of push-pull and how it works, as well as the plants that make up the push-pull system that is being implemented against E. saccharina in South Africa. A dearth in practical knowledge regarding the implementation of push-pull was seen as a major barrier to the adoption of this strategy, as was financial instability, farmer attitudes and poor institutional support. Farmers recommended collaboration amongst stakeholders, improved education, proof of the efficacy of push-pull and incentives as tools to improve the implementation of this strategy in the coastal sugarcane growing regions of KZN. Farmers preferred direct contact with extension personnel and experiential learning opportunities when acquiring information about push- pull and other new pest management practices. If opportunities for push-pull education are increased through direct contact with extension personnel, and through on-farm demonstrations, and if inputs are provided in the form of push-pull plants, it is likely that push-pull will succeed amongst coastal LSGs, especially since farmers had an overall positive attitude towards the technology. Surveys amongst small-scale sugarcane growers (SSGs) showed that sugarcane is important in the lives of these farmers. The SSGs perceive pests to be a major constraint to their farming systems, and they identified E. saccharina as a major pest of sugarcane. The farmers also demonstrated good knowledge of sugarcane pests and vegetable pests. However, SSGs lacked knowledge regarding pest management practices and beneficial insects. Extension and advisory services should to continue concentrating on pest management practices to educate SSGs on the variety and application of pest control strategies. SSGs were found to employ complex, diverse and integrated agricultural systems that are well-suited to the implementation of IPM technologies such as push-pull. Since insect pests act were found to be a major constraint to SSG sugarcane production, push-pull was deemed a feasible pest management strategy for coastal farmers and its implementation by SSGs should be further explored. SSGs in this study were also concerned about vegetable pests, therefore if push-pull can be adapted to help protect additional crops, adoption of this technology by small-scale growers will improve.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Mulcahy, Megan Marie
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Pyralidae -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal , Pests -- Integrated control , Sugarcane -- Diseases and pests -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal , Stem borers -- Effect of habitat modification on -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal , Insect-plant relationships -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal
- Language: English
- Type: text , Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/63290 , vital:28390
- Description: Eldana saccharina, an indigenous lepidopteran stemborer, is considered the most damaging pest of sugarcane in South Africa. Researchers have advocated the use of an area-wide integrated pest management (AW-IPM) programme as a means of improving the control of this pest. A push-pull strategy was developed as a component of this AW-IPM approach. The push-pull strategy in sugarcane is a habitat management method of pest control that uses plants that are both repellent (Melinis Minutiflora) and attractive (Cyperus dives, Cyperus papyrus and Bt-maize) to E. saccharina. Previous research into push-pull has shown that this strategy is an effective tool for the control of E. saccharina. Push-pull has been implemented successfully in the Midlands North sugarcane growing region of KwaZulu-Natal (KZN), South Africa. Despite the proven efficacy of push-pull, very little push-pull research has been conducted in the coastal sugarcane growing regions of KZN, and adoption of this technology has been poor in these regions. Therefore, the aim of this research was to facilitate the implementation of push-pull for the management of E. saccharina in sugarcane in the coastal regions of KZN. This was done by focussing on on-farm field trials and farmer participatory research. On-farm push-pull field trials were conducted on five model farms in the North and South Coast sugarcane growing regions of KZN. High levels of E. saccharina were recorded during this study. The push-pull treatment sites showed a significant reduction of E. saccharina damage on four of the five farms used in the study. Mean percentage of stalks damaged decreased by up to 50 % in the presence of the repellent grass species, M. minutiflora. The number of E. saccharina found per 100 stalks also decreased significantly at these farms. The farm which did not show a significant reduction in E. saccharina populations or damage had low numbers of this pest in the sugarcane throughout the experiment. This demonstrates that push-pull is more effective in areas that have high levels of E. saccharina. Stem borer surveys in wetlands on sugarcane farms revealed that high numbers of E. saccharina were found within the pull plants, C. papyrus and C. dives, in comparison to the push-pull sites. This verifies that the pull plants do work efficiently to attract E. saccharina away from sugarcane. Additionally, eight parasitoids emerged from E. saccharina larvae collected in wetland sedges. The beneficial roles that push-pull plants play in attracting and maintaining natural enemies in the agroecosystem are discussed, and these findings further demonstrate the important ecosystem, and pest management services that wetlands provide on sugarcane farms. The success of the push-pull trials in this study show that this technology can be an effective tool for controlling E. saccharina in the coastal sugarcane growing regions. The timing of the planting of push-pull plants was shown to play a role in the efficacy of this technology. The study also confirmed that push-pull should be used as a component of AW-IPM in conjunction with good crop management practices. Surveys were undertaken to determine large-scale sugarcane growers' (LSGs) knowledge and perceptions of E. saccharina and other pests. Research regarding the farmers' perceptions of push- pull was also conducted to better understand the drivers and barriers to adoption of push-pull, and other new technologies. The surveys found that large-scale farmers in the coastal regions suffer from high infestations of E. saccharina. As such there is scope for the introduction of new pest management practices such as push-pull in this area. Farmers also demonstrated a good basic knowledge of E. saccharina and IPM. However, LSGs had a poor understanding of push-pull and how it works, as well as the plants that make up the push-pull system that is being implemented against E. saccharina in South Africa. A dearth in practical knowledge regarding the implementation of push-pull was seen as a major barrier to the adoption of this strategy, as was financial instability, farmer attitudes and poor institutional support. Farmers recommended collaboration amongst stakeholders, improved education, proof of the efficacy of push-pull and incentives as tools to improve the implementation of this strategy in the coastal sugarcane growing regions of KZN. Farmers preferred direct contact with extension personnel and experiential learning opportunities when acquiring information about push- pull and other new pest management practices. If opportunities for push-pull education are increased through direct contact with extension personnel, and through on-farm demonstrations, and if inputs are provided in the form of push-pull plants, it is likely that push-pull will succeed amongst coastal LSGs, especially since farmers had an overall positive attitude towards the technology. Surveys amongst small-scale sugarcane growers (SSGs) showed that sugarcane is important in the lives of these farmers. The SSGs perceive pests to be a major constraint to their farming systems, and they identified E. saccharina as a major pest of sugarcane. The farmers also demonstrated good knowledge of sugarcane pests and vegetable pests. However, SSGs lacked knowledge regarding pest management practices and beneficial insects. Extension and advisory services should to continue concentrating on pest management practices to educate SSGs on the variety and application of pest control strategies. SSGs were found to employ complex, diverse and integrated agricultural systems that are well-suited to the implementation of IPM technologies such as push-pull. Since insect pests act were found to be a major constraint to SSG sugarcane production, push-pull was deemed a feasible pest management strategy for coastal farmers and its implementation by SSGs should be further explored. SSGs in this study were also concerned about vegetable pests, therefore if push-pull can be adapted to help protect additional crops, adoption of this technology by small-scale growers will improve.
- Full Text:
Towards the development of a mycoinsecticide to control white grubs (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in South African sugarcane
- Authors: Goble, Tarryn Anne
- Date: 2013
- Subjects: Insecticides -- Environmental aspects Insecticides -- Toxicology Beetles -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal Beetles -- Control -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal Coleophoridae -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal Scarabaeidae -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal Sugarcane -- Diseases and pests -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal Sugarcane -- Diseases and pests -- Control -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal , Insecticides
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: vital:5586 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1001748
- Description: In the KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) Midlands North region of South Africa, the importance and increased prevalence of endemic scarabaeids, particularly Hypopholis sommeri Burmeister and Schizonycha affinis Boheman (Coleoptera: Melolonthinae), as soil pests of sugarcane, and a need for their control was established. The development of a mycoinsecticide offers an environmentally friendly alternative to chemical insecticides. The identification of a diversity of white grub species, in two Scarabaeidae subfamilies, representing seven genera were collected in sugarcane as a pest complex. Hypopholis sommeri and S. affinis were the most prevalent species. The increased seasonal abundances, diversity and highly aggregated nature of these scarabaeid species in summer months, suggested that targeting and control strategies for these pests should be considered in this season. Increased rainfall, relative humidity and soil temperatures were linked to the increased occurrence of scarab adults and neonate grubs. Beauveria brongniartii (Saccardo) Petch epizootics were recorded at two sites in the KZN Midlands North on H. sommeri. Seventeen different fluorescently-labelled microsatellite PCR primers were used to target 78 isolates of Beauveria sp. DNA. Microsatellite data resolved two distinct clusters of Beauveria isolates which represented the Beauveria bassiana senso stricto (Balsamo) Vuillemin and B. brongniartii species groups. These groupings were supported by two gene regions, the nuclear ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) and the nuclear B locus (Bloc) gene of which 23 exemplar Beauveria isolates were represented and sequenced. When microsatellite data were analysed, 26 haplotypes among 58 isolates of B. brongniartii were distinguished. Relatively low levels of genetic diversity were detected in B. brongniartii and isolates were shown to be closely related. There was no genetic differentiation between the two sites, Harden Heights and Canema in the KZN Midlands North. High gene flow from swarming H. sommeri beetles is the proposed mechanism for this lack of genetic differentiation between populations. Microsatellite analyses also showed that B. brongniartii conidia were being cycled from arboreal to subterranean habitats in the environment by H. sommeri beetles. This was the first record of this species of fungus causing epizootics on the larvae and adults of H. sommeri in South Africa. The virulence of 21 isolates of Beauveria brongniartii and two isolates of B. bassiana were evaluated against the adults and larvae of S. affinis and the adults of H. sommeri and Tenebrio molitor Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Despite being closely-related, B. brongniartii isolates varied significantly in their virulence towards different hosts and highlighted the host specific nature of B. brongniartii towards S. affinis when compared to B. bassiana. Adults of S. affinis were significantly more susceptible to B. brongniartii isolates than the second (L2) or third instar (L3) grubs. The median lethal time (LT₅₀) of the most virulent B. brongniartii isolate (C13) against S. affinis adults was 7.8 days and probit analysis estimated a median lethal concentration (LC₅₀) of 4.4×10⁷ conidia/ml⁻¹. When L2 grubs were treated with a concentration of 1.0×10⁸ conidia/ml⁻¹, B. brongniartii isolates HHWG1, HHB39A and C17 caused mortality in L2 grubs within 18.4-19.8 days (LT₅₀). Beauveria brongniartii isolate HHWG1 was tested against the L3 grubs of S. affinis at four different concentrations. At the lowest concentration (1×10⁶ conidia/ml⁻¹), the LT₅₀ was 25.8 days, and at the highest concentration (1×10⁹ conidia/ml⁻¹) the LT₅₀ dropped to 15.1 days. The persistence of B. bassiana isolate 4222 formulated on rice and wheat bran and buried at eight field sites in the KZN Midlands North was evaluated by plating out a suspension of treated soil onto a selective medium. All eight field sites showed a significant decline in B. bassiana CFUs per gram of soil over time, with few conidia still present in the samples after a year. Greater declines in CFUs were observed at some sites but there were no significant differences observed in the persistence of conidia formulated on rice or wheat bran as carriers. Overall, poor persistence of B. bassiana isolate 4222 was attributed to suboptimum temperatures, rainfall, which rapidly degraded the nutritive carriers, attenuated fungal genotype and the action of antagonistic soil microbes. Growers’ perceptions of white grubs as pests and the feasibility of a mycoinsecticide market were evaluated by means of a semi-structured questionnaire. The study showed that the reduced feasibility of application, general lack of potential demand for a product, high cost factors and most importantly, the lack of pest perception, were factors which would negatively affect the adoption of a granular mycoinsecticide. Growers however exhibited a positive attitude towards mycoinsecticides, and showed all the relevant attributes for successful technology adoption. It is recommended that because B. brongniartii epizootics were recorded on target pests which indicated good host specificity, dispersal ability and persistence of the fungus in the intended environment of application; that a mycoinsecticide based on this fungal species be developed. What will likely increase adoption and success of a mycoinsecticide is collaboration between various industries partners to increases market potential in other crops such as Acacia mearnsii De Wild (Fabales: Fabaceae).
- Full Text:
- Authors: Goble, Tarryn Anne
- Date: 2013
- Subjects: Insecticides -- Environmental aspects Insecticides -- Toxicology Beetles -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal Beetles -- Control -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal Coleophoridae -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal Scarabaeidae -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal Sugarcane -- Diseases and pests -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal Sugarcane -- Diseases and pests -- Control -- South Africa -- KwaZulu-Natal , Insecticides
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: vital:5586 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1001748
- Description: In the KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) Midlands North region of South Africa, the importance and increased prevalence of endemic scarabaeids, particularly Hypopholis sommeri Burmeister and Schizonycha affinis Boheman (Coleoptera: Melolonthinae), as soil pests of sugarcane, and a need for their control was established. The development of a mycoinsecticide offers an environmentally friendly alternative to chemical insecticides. The identification of a diversity of white grub species, in two Scarabaeidae subfamilies, representing seven genera were collected in sugarcane as a pest complex. Hypopholis sommeri and S. affinis were the most prevalent species. The increased seasonal abundances, diversity and highly aggregated nature of these scarabaeid species in summer months, suggested that targeting and control strategies for these pests should be considered in this season. Increased rainfall, relative humidity and soil temperatures were linked to the increased occurrence of scarab adults and neonate grubs. Beauveria brongniartii (Saccardo) Petch epizootics were recorded at two sites in the KZN Midlands North on H. sommeri. Seventeen different fluorescently-labelled microsatellite PCR primers were used to target 78 isolates of Beauveria sp. DNA. Microsatellite data resolved two distinct clusters of Beauveria isolates which represented the Beauveria bassiana senso stricto (Balsamo) Vuillemin and B. brongniartii species groups. These groupings were supported by two gene regions, the nuclear ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) and the nuclear B locus (Bloc) gene of which 23 exemplar Beauveria isolates were represented and sequenced. When microsatellite data were analysed, 26 haplotypes among 58 isolates of B. brongniartii were distinguished. Relatively low levels of genetic diversity were detected in B. brongniartii and isolates were shown to be closely related. There was no genetic differentiation between the two sites, Harden Heights and Canema in the KZN Midlands North. High gene flow from swarming H. sommeri beetles is the proposed mechanism for this lack of genetic differentiation between populations. Microsatellite analyses also showed that B. brongniartii conidia were being cycled from arboreal to subterranean habitats in the environment by H. sommeri beetles. This was the first record of this species of fungus causing epizootics on the larvae and adults of H. sommeri in South Africa. The virulence of 21 isolates of Beauveria brongniartii and two isolates of B. bassiana were evaluated against the adults and larvae of S. affinis and the adults of H. sommeri and Tenebrio molitor Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Despite being closely-related, B. brongniartii isolates varied significantly in their virulence towards different hosts and highlighted the host specific nature of B. brongniartii towards S. affinis when compared to B. bassiana. Adults of S. affinis were significantly more susceptible to B. brongniartii isolates than the second (L2) or third instar (L3) grubs. The median lethal time (LT₅₀) of the most virulent B. brongniartii isolate (C13) against S. affinis adults was 7.8 days and probit analysis estimated a median lethal concentration (LC₅₀) of 4.4×10⁷ conidia/ml⁻¹. When L2 grubs were treated with a concentration of 1.0×10⁸ conidia/ml⁻¹, B. brongniartii isolates HHWG1, HHB39A and C17 caused mortality in L2 grubs within 18.4-19.8 days (LT₅₀). Beauveria brongniartii isolate HHWG1 was tested against the L3 grubs of S. affinis at four different concentrations. At the lowest concentration (1×10⁶ conidia/ml⁻¹), the LT₅₀ was 25.8 days, and at the highest concentration (1×10⁹ conidia/ml⁻¹) the LT₅₀ dropped to 15.1 days. The persistence of B. bassiana isolate 4222 formulated on rice and wheat bran and buried at eight field sites in the KZN Midlands North was evaluated by plating out a suspension of treated soil onto a selective medium. All eight field sites showed a significant decline in B. bassiana CFUs per gram of soil over time, with few conidia still present in the samples after a year. Greater declines in CFUs were observed at some sites but there were no significant differences observed in the persistence of conidia formulated on rice or wheat bran as carriers. Overall, poor persistence of B. bassiana isolate 4222 was attributed to suboptimum temperatures, rainfall, which rapidly degraded the nutritive carriers, attenuated fungal genotype and the action of antagonistic soil microbes. Growers’ perceptions of white grubs as pests and the feasibility of a mycoinsecticide market were evaluated by means of a semi-structured questionnaire. The study showed that the reduced feasibility of application, general lack of potential demand for a product, high cost factors and most importantly, the lack of pest perception, were factors which would negatively affect the adoption of a granular mycoinsecticide. Growers however exhibited a positive attitude towards mycoinsecticides, and showed all the relevant attributes for successful technology adoption. It is recommended that because B. brongniartii epizootics were recorded on target pests which indicated good host specificity, dispersal ability and persistence of the fungus in the intended environment of application; that a mycoinsecticide based on this fungal species be developed. What will likely increase adoption and success of a mycoinsecticide is collaboration between various industries partners to increases market potential in other crops such as Acacia mearnsii De Wild (Fabales: Fabaceae).
- Full Text:
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »