Development and optimisation of a qPCR assay for the enumeration of Cryptophlebia leucotreta granulovirus (CrleGV) used for commercial applications
- Authors: Mela, Thuthula
- Date: 2022-10-14
- Subjects: Cryptophlebia leucotreta granulovirus , Cryptophlebia leucotreta , Late expression factor 8 (LEF-8) , Late expression factor 9 , Dark field microscopy , Genomic DNA , Polymerase chain reaction , Plasmids
- Language: English
- Type: Academic theses , Master's theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/362949 , vital:65377
- Description: The citrus industry contributes significantly to the South African agricultural sector. Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) is highly important to the South African citrus industry as it is classified as a phytosanitary pest by most international markets. Thaumatotibia leucotreta has caused an estimated annual loss of up to R100 million to the industry. In order to control T. leucotreta in South Africa, an integrated pest management (IPM) programme has been used. One of the components of this programme is Cryptophlebia leucotreta granulovirus (CrleGV), which has been formulated to a registered biopesticide namely Cryptogran and has been successfully applied in the field for over 15 years. To use CrleGV as biopesticides, quantification of the viral particles is required to perform bioassays for field trials and formulation, among other applications. Darkfield microscopy is a traditional method used for the quantification of CrleGV; however, the method is characterised as being subjective, tedious, labour intensive, and time-consuming. This study aims to develop and optimise a qPCR technique to accurately quantify CrleGV-SA OBs using plasmid DNA for downstream applications. Firstly, lef-8, lef-9, and granulin conserved genes from CrleGV-SA and CrleGV-CV3 genome sequences were analysed by performing multiple alignments to evaluate the degree of identity between these genes. This was done to design two sets of oligonucleotides (internal and external) from regions with the highest identity. Subsequently, in silico testing was done to evaluate the designed oligonucleotides to determine whether they specifically bind to the selected target regions. Secondly, three sets of DNA plasmids (pJET1.2-Gran, pJET1.2-lef-9, and pJET1.2-lef-8) were constructed, each containing a target region for either granulin, lef-9, and lef-8 genes for use as standards in a downstream qPCR assay. This was achieved by first extracting gDNA from CrleGV-SA OBs and using the gDNA as a template to PCR amplify the target regions of the selected gene regions with the designed oligonucleotides. Subsequently, the PCR amplified regions were then directly ligated into the pJET1.2/blunt vector, and the plasmids were confirmed by colony PCR, restriction enzyme digestion, and Sanger sequencing. Thirdly, two different methods of CrleGV-SA gDNA extraction were compared to determine which method has the best yields in terms of concentration. The extraction methods compared were the Quick-DNA Miniprep Plus kit according to manufacturer’s instructions (Method 1a), pre-treatment with Na2CO3 prior to using the Quick-DNA Miniprep Plus kit (Method 1b), pre- treatment with Na2CO3, and neutralisation with Tris-HCl prior to gDNA extraction using the Quick-DNA Miniprep Plus kit (Method 1c) and the CTAB method (Method 2). The gDNA concentration and purity for all samples were determined using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer. Method 1c (Na2CO3 and Tris-HCl pre-treated plus Quick-DNA Miniprep Plus kit) was the most efficient at extracting genomic DNA compared with the other methods, resulting in the highest DNA concentration in short processing time. Fourthly, plasmid standards were evaluated for use in the qPCR assay. This was done as it was important to consider the efficacy of the oligonucleotides; including the ability of the oligonucleotides to anneal to the appropriate segment of DNA without extensive formation of oligonucleotides dimers, non-specific annealing, or formation of secondary structure. In addition, it was done to ensure that highly accurate standard curves were generated. The standard curves were to be utilised in the downstream qPCR assay to determine the quantity of test samples by interpolation, reading from the values within the standard curve. Lastly, darkfield microscopy and qPCR methods of enumeration were compared to verify their accuracy and determine the most consistent and comparable method. This was achieved by quantifying the purified, crude-purified, and viral formulated CrleGV-SA suspensions using these methods. Subsequently, a statistical analysis was conducted to compare the results produced by the two enumeration methods. The obtained results showed that the granulin, lef- 8 and lef-9 qPCR values did not significantly differ from the darkfield microscopy results. The findings of this study revealed that the two assays, lef-8 qPCR and lef-9 qPCR, were more robust, sensitive, and efficient for the quantification of CrleGV-SA. Thus, this study has successfully developed a qPCR assay that is comparable with the traditional darkfield microscopy counting technique. This is the first study to use the qPCR technique to enumerate CrleGV-SA using plasmid standards. The developed qPCR assay is reliable, rapid, and cost- effective and has a great potential to be used as an alternative method to darkfield microscopy in the laboratory and commercial settings. , Thesis (MSc) -- Faculty of Science, Biochemistry and Microbiology, 2022
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2022-10-14
- Authors: Mela, Thuthula
- Date: 2022-10-14
- Subjects: Cryptophlebia leucotreta granulovirus , Cryptophlebia leucotreta , Late expression factor 8 (LEF-8) , Late expression factor 9 , Dark field microscopy , Genomic DNA , Polymerase chain reaction , Plasmids
- Language: English
- Type: Academic theses , Master's theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/362949 , vital:65377
- Description: The citrus industry contributes significantly to the South African agricultural sector. Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) is highly important to the South African citrus industry as it is classified as a phytosanitary pest by most international markets. Thaumatotibia leucotreta has caused an estimated annual loss of up to R100 million to the industry. In order to control T. leucotreta in South Africa, an integrated pest management (IPM) programme has been used. One of the components of this programme is Cryptophlebia leucotreta granulovirus (CrleGV), which has been formulated to a registered biopesticide namely Cryptogran and has been successfully applied in the field for over 15 years. To use CrleGV as biopesticides, quantification of the viral particles is required to perform bioassays for field trials and formulation, among other applications. Darkfield microscopy is a traditional method used for the quantification of CrleGV; however, the method is characterised as being subjective, tedious, labour intensive, and time-consuming. This study aims to develop and optimise a qPCR technique to accurately quantify CrleGV-SA OBs using plasmid DNA for downstream applications. Firstly, lef-8, lef-9, and granulin conserved genes from CrleGV-SA and CrleGV-CV3 genome sequences were analysed by performing multiple alignments to evaluate the degree of identity between these genes. This was done to design two sets of oligonucleotides (internal and external) from regions with the highest identity. Subsequently, in silico testing was done to evaluate the designed oligonucleotides to determine whether they specifically bind to the selected target regions. Secondly, three sets of DNA plasmids (pJET1.2-Gran, pJET1.2-lef-9, and pJET1.2-lef-8) were constructed, each containing a target region for either granulin, lef-9, and lef-8 genes for use as standards in a downstream qPCR assay. This was achieved by first extracting gDNA from CrleGV-SA OBs and using the gDNA as a template to PCR amplify the target regions of the selected gene regions with the designed oligonucleotides. Subsequently, the PCR amplified regions were then directly ligated into the pJET1.2/blunt vector, and the plasmids were confirmed by colony PCR, restriction enzyme digestion, and Sanger sequencing. Thirdly, two different methods of CrleGV-SA gDNA extraction were compared to determine which method has the best yields in terms of concentration. The extraction methods compared were the Quick-DNA Miniprep Plus kit according to manufacturer’s instructions (Method 1a), pre-treatment with Na2CO3 prior to using the Quick-DNA Miniprep Plus kit (Method 1b), pre- treatment with Na2CO3, and neutralisation with Tris-HCl prior to gDNA extraction using the Quick-DNA Miniprep Plus kit (Method 1c) and the CTAB method (Method 2). The gDNA concentration and purity for all samples were determined using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer. Method 1c (Na2CO3 and Tris-HCl pre-treated plus Quick-DNA Miniprep Plus kit) was the most efficient at extracting genomic DNA compared with the other methods, resulting in the highest DNA concentration in short processing time. Fourthly, plasmid standards were evaluated for use in the qPCR assay. This was done as it was important to consider the efficacy of the oligonucleotides; including the ability of the oligonucleotides to anneal to the appropriate segment of DNA without extensive formation of oligonucleotides dimers, non-specific annealing, or formation of secondary structure. In addition, it was done to ensure that highly accurate standard curves were generated. The standard curves were to be utilised in the downstream qPCR assay to determine the quantity of test samples by interpolation, reading from the values within the standard curve. Lastly, darkfield microscopy and qPCR methods of enumeration were compared to verify their accuracy and determine the most consistent and comparable method. This was achieved by quantifying the purified, crude-purified, and viral formulated CrleGV-SA suspensions using these methods. Subsequently, a statistical analysis was conducted to compare the results produced by the two enumeration methods. The obtained results showed that the granulin, lef- 8 and lef-9 qPCR values did not significantly differ from the darkfield microscopy results. The findings of this study revealed that the two assays, lef-8 qPCR and lef-9 qPCR, were more robust, sensitive, and efficient for the quantification of CrleGV-SA. Thus, this study has successfully developed a qPCR assay that is comparable with the traditional darkfield microscopy counting technique. This is the first study to use the qPCR technique to enumerate CrleGV-SA using plasmid standards. The developed qPCR assay is reliable, rapid, and cost- effective and has a great potential to be used as an alternative method to darkfield microscopy in the laboratory and commercial settings. , Thesis (MSc) -- Faculty of Science, Biochemistry and Microbiology, 2022
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2022-10-14
Genetic analysis and field application of a UV-tolerant strain of CrleGV for improved control of Thaumatotibia leucotreta
- Authors: Bennett, Tahnee Tashia
- Date: 2022-10-14
- Subjects: Cryptophlebia leucotreta Biological control , Pests Integrated control , Biological pest control agents , Ultraviolet radiation , Oligonucleotides
- Language: English
- Type: Academic theses , Master's theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/362741 , vital:65358
- Description: Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), also known as false codling moth (FCM), is indigenous to sub-Saharan Africa. Thaumatotibia leucotreta has been controlled through an integrated pest management (IPM) programme, which includes chemical control, sterile insect technique (SIT), cultural and biological control. As part of the biological control, a key component is the use of Cryptophlebia leucotreta granulovirus (CrleGV-SA). Currently, CryptogranTM, a commercial formulation of CrleGV, is the preferred product to use in South Africa for the control of T. leucotreta. The registration of the biopesticide Cryptogran (River bioscience, South Africa) was established after conducting extensive field trials with CrleGV-SA. One of the major factors affecting the baculovirus efficacy in the field is UV irradiation. A UV-tolerant Cryptophlebia leucotreta granulovirus (CrleGV-SA-C5) isolate was isolated after consecutive cycles of UV exposure. This UV-tolerant isolate is genetically distinct from the CrleGV-SA isolate. The CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate has the potential as a biological control agent. The control of T. leucotreta in South Africa could be improved by the development of novel isolates into new biopesticide formulations. To date, there has not been any field trials conducted on the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate. Therefore, it is important to determine the biological and genetic stability of this isolate and to conduct field trials with CrleGV-SA- C5 to test the efficacy of the isolate before possible production into a biopesticide. A de novo assembly was conducted to reassemble the genome of CrleGV-SA-C5 which was followed by a sequence comparison with the CrleGV-SA genome. The identification of SNPs, led to the design of oligonucleotides flanking the regions where the SNPs were detected. Polymerase chain reaction amplification of the target regions was conducted using the oligonucleotides. After sequence comparison, seven SNPs were detected and PCR amplification was successful using the three oligonucleotides, Pif-2, HypoP and Lef-8/HP. To differentiate between CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA genomes and confirm the presence of the SNPs, two methods of screening were conducted. The first was the construction of six plasmids, the plasmids contained the targeted pif-2, HypoP, and the Lef-8/HP insert regions from both the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA genome region where the SNPs were identified, followed by sequencing. The Five recombinant plasmids, pC5_Pif-2, pSA_Pif-2, pC5_HypoP, pSA_HypoP, and pC5_Lef-8/HP were successfully sequenced. No amplicon was obtained for one of the plasmids used as template (pSA_Lef-8/HP) and therefore the PCR product used for cloning was sequenced instead. Sequence alignment confirmed the presence of four of the five targeted SNPs in the genome of the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate. However, of these only one SNP (UV_7) rendered a suitable marker for the differentiation between the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA isolates as the SNPs, UV_2, UV_3 and UV_5, were also present in the CrleGV- SA sequences. The second screening method was a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) melt curve analysis to differentiate between the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA isolates. qPCR melt curve analysis was done using the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA HypoP PCR products. This technique was unable to differentiate between the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA isolates. However, this may be as a result of sequence data confirming that SNP UV_5 originally identified in the CrleGV-SA-C5 HypoP region was identical to the SNP at the same position in the CrleGV-SA HypoP region. Following the differentiation of the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA isolates through two screening methods, the genetic integrity of the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate after two virus bulk-ups was determined by PCR amplification of the target regions in the bulk-up virus followed by sequencing. Prior to virus bulk-up, surface dose bioassays were conducted on 4th instar larvae and LC50 and LC90 values of 4.01 x 106 OBs/ml and 8.75 x 109 OBs/ml respectively were obtained. The CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate was then bulked up in fourth instar T. leucotreta larvae using the LC90 value that was determined. Sequencing of the target regions from the CrleGV- SA-C5_BU2 (bulk-up 2) was conducted. Sequencing results confirmed the presence of the target SNPs in the CrleGV-SA-C5_BU2 genome. The UV-tolerance of the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate in comparison to the CrleGV-SA isolate was evaluated by detached fruit bioassays under natural UV irradiation. Two detached fruit bioassays were set-up, a UV exposure and a non-UV exposure bioassay set-up. Three treatments were used for each bioassay set-up which were the viruses CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA and a ddH2O control. Statistical analysis indicated that there was no significant difference between the virus treatments in both the UV exposed detached fruit bioassay and the non-UV exposed detached fruit bioassay. This study is the second study to report on the de novo assembly of the CrleGV-SA-C5 and sequence comparison with the CrleGV-SA genome, and the first to report on the UV-tolerance of the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate by detached fruit bioassays. Future work could involve further evaluation of intraspecific genetic variability in the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate and to identify any additional SNPs present within the genome that can be used as suitable markers for differentiation between the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA isolates. It was recognised that it is required to conduct further detached fruit bioassays and field trials, but with improved protocols, for the efficacy and UV-tolerance of the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate to be conclusively determined. , Thesis (MSc) -- Faculty of Science, Zoology and Entomology, 2022
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2022-10-14
- Authors: Bennett, Tahnee Tashia
- Date: 2022-10-14
- Subjects: Cryptophlebia leucotreta Biological control , Pests Integrated control , Biological pest control agents , Ultraviolet radiation , Oligonucleotides
- Language: English
- Type: Academic theses , Master's theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/362741 , vital:65358
- Description: Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), also known as false codling moth (FCM), is indigenous to sub-Saharan Africa. Thaumatotibia leucotreta has been controlled through an integrated pest management (IPM) programme, which includes chemical control, sterile insect technique (SIT), cultural and biological control. As part of the biological control, a key component is the use of Cryptophlebia leucotreta granulovirus (CrleGV-SA). Currently, CryptogranTM, a commercial formulation of CrleGV, is the preferred product to use in South Africa for the control of T. leucotreta. The registration of the biopesticide Cryptogran (River bioscience, South Africa) was established after conducting extensive field trials with CrleGV-SA. One of the major factors affecting the baculovirus efficacy in the field is UV irradiation. A UV-tolerant Cryptophlebia leucotreta granulovirus (CrleGV-SA-C5) isolate was isolated after consecutive cycles of UV exposure. This UV-tolerant isolate is genetically distinct from the CrleGV-SA isolate. The CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate has the potential as a biological control agent. The control of T. leucotreta in South Africa could be improved by the development of novel isolates into new biopesticide formulations. To date, there has not been any field trials conducted on the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate. Therefore, it is important to determine the biological and genetic stability of this isolate and to conduct field trials with CrleGV-SA- C5 to test the efficacy of the isolate before possible production into a biopesticide. A de novo assembly was conducted to reassemble the genome of CrleGV-SA-C5 which was followed by a sequence comparison with the CrleGV-SA genome. The identification of SNPs, led to the design of oligonucleotides flanking the regions where the SNPs were detected. Polymerase chain reaction amplification of the target regions was conducted using the oligonucleotides. After sequence comparison, seven SNPs were detected and PCR amplification was successful using the three oligonucleotides, Pif-2, HypoP and Lef-8/HP. To differentiate between CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA genomes and confirm the presence of the SNPs, two methods of screening were conducted. The first was the construction of six plasmids, the plasmids contained the targeted pif-2, HypoP, and the Lef-8/HP insert regions from both the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA genome region where the SNPs were identified, followed by sequencing. The Five recombinant plasmids, pC5_Pif-2, pSA_Pif-2, pC5_HypoP, pSA_HypoP, and pC5_Lef-8/HP were successfully sequenced. No amplicon was obtained for one of the plasmids used as template (pSA_Lef-8/HP) and therefore the PCR product used for cloning was sequenced instead. Sequence alignment confirmed the presence of four of the five targeted SNPs in the genome of the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate. However, of these only one SNP (UV_7) rendered a suitable marker for the differentiation between the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA isolates as the SNPs, UV_2, UV_3 and UV_5, were also present in the CrleGV- SA sequences. The second screening method was a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) melt curve analysis to differentiate between the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA isolates. qPCR melt curve analysis was done using the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA HypoP PCR products. This technique was unable to differentiate between the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA isolates. However, this may be as a result of sequence data confirming that SNP UV_5 originally identified in the CrleGV-SA-C5 HypoP region was identical to the SNP at the same position in the CrleGV-SA HypoP region. Following the differentiation of the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA isolates through two screening methods, the genetic integrity of the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate after two virus bulk-ups was determined by PCR amplification of the target regions in the bulk-up virus followed by sequencing. Prior to virus bulk-up, surface dose bioassays were conducted on 4th instar larvae and LC50 and LC90 values of 4.01 x 106 OBs/ml and 8.75 x 109 OBs/ml respectively were obtained. The CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate was then bulked up in fourth instar T. leucotreta larvae using the LC90 value that was determined. Sequencing of the target regions from the CrleGV- SA-C5_BU2 (bulk-up 2) was conducted. Sequencing results confirmed the presence of the target SNPs in the CrleGV-SA-C5_BU2 genome. The UV-tolerance of the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate in comparison to the CrleGV-SA isolate was evaluated by detached fruit bioassays under natural UV irradiation. Two detached fruit bioassays were set-up, a UV exposure and a non-UV exposure bioassay set-up. Three treatments were used for each bioassay set-up which were the viruses CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA and a ddH2O control. Statistical analysis indicated that there was no significant difference between the virus treatments in both the UV exposed detached fruit bioassay and the non-UV exposed detached fruit bioassay. This study is the second study to report on the de novo assembly of the CrleGV-SA-C5 and sequence comparison with the CrleGV-SA genome, and the first to report on the UV-tolerance of the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate by detached fruit bioassays. Future work could involve further evaluation of intraspecific genetic variability in the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate and to identify any additional SNPs present within the genome that can be used as suitable markers for differentiation between the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA isolates. It was recognised that it is required to conduct further detached fruit bioassays and field trials, but with improved protocols, for the efficacy and UV-tolerance of the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate to be conclusively determined. , Thesis (MSc) -- Faculty of Science, Zoology and Entomology, 2022
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2022-10-14
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »