Institutional Repositories and Regional Collaboration: the Content Pro IRX Implementation at SEALS
- Clarke, Roelien, Van der Walt, Wynand
- Authors: Clarke, Roelien , Van der Walt, Wynand
- Date: 2013
- Language: English
- Type: Conference paper , text
- Identifier: vital:6977 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1007310
- Description: Paper delivered at the Annual Innovative User Group South Africa (IUGSA) Conference held in Bloemfontein, University of the Free State, 13-15 November 2013
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2013
- Authors: Clarke, Roelien , Van der Walt, Wynand
- Date: 2013
- Language: English
- Type: Conference paper , text
- Identifier: vital:6977 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1007310
- Description: Paper delivered at the Annual Innovative User Group South Africa (IUGSA) Conference held in Bloemfontein, University of the Free State, 13-15 November 2013
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2013
New Frontiers of Librarianship
- Authors: Satgoor, Ujala
- Date: 2013
- Language: English
- Type: Conference paper , text
- Identifier: vital:6976 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1007308
- Description: Paper delivered at the Sabinet Client Conference, 6 September 2013
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2013
- Authors: Satgoor, Ujala
- Date: 2013
- Language: English
- Type: Conference paper , text
- Identifier: vital:6976 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1007308
- Description: Paper delivered at the Sabinet Client Conference, 6 September 2013
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2013
Towards an exceptional undergraduate personal learning experience: the Personal Librarian Programme, a pilot project at Rhodes University Library
- Authors: Gontshi, V
- Date: 2013
- Language: English
- Type: Conference paper
- Identifier: vital:6978 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1007916
- Description: This paper is a record of a unique intervention for enhancing the Undergraduate learning experience at Rhodes University. It will focus on the establishment of the project, the experiences encountered and lessons learned thus far. In April 2013, a vibrant team of 13 librarians embarked on a Personal Librarian Pilot Project at the Rhodes University Library. The Personal Librarian Programme is primarily directed at undergraduate students at Rhodes University. In an attempt to bridge the information literacy skills gap that exists between Senior School and University in South Africa, the idea behind this programme is that each incoming first year student is assigned a Personal Librarian who will remain that individual’s contact in the library throughout his/her academic career at Rhodes University. The project came about as a result of research exploring the perceptions of both students and lecturers in the Commerce Faculty at Rhodes University with regard to Information Literacy practices and needs (Gontshi, 2011). The study revealed and recorded a shortcoming in the Information Literacy ability of students between Senior School Level and University Level. It became clear that new University students were not aware of the important link between their academic studies and the Library which in turn suggested the need to make Rhodes University librarians and the role that they play in the academic world more obvious to these new students (Gontshi, 2011). The Personal Librarian Programme was devised to fill this need. The Librarians involved in this programme include staff from all sections of the Library: circulation, faculty liaison and bibliographic/technical services. The training needs of staff who did not work directly with students were identified and the relevant training provided. The staff from Circulation and Bibliographic/Technical services sections identified a need to advance their knowledge on the use of library from a users’ perspective. The training focused on the following: “Brainstorming a research topic with a student”; “Identifying relevant databases to conduct a research topic” and “Conducting a search on relevant databases for the research topic” – this included ‘different ways of devising an effective search technique’. The training ensured a good foundation for these librarians to develop their confidence to work with users. The project, modeled on a similar programme at the Yale University Library in America, was also a direct result of Rhodes University Library’s involvement in the Carnegie Research Libraries Consortium (2009 – 2011) and a ten-week internship in the United States, seven weeks of which were spent at Yale University.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2013
- Authors: Gontshi, V
- Date: 2013
- Language: English
- Type: Conference paper
- Identifier: vital:6978 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1007916
- Description: This paper is a record of a unique intervention for enhancing the Undergraduate learning experience at Rhodes University. It will focus on the establishment of the project, the experiences encountered and lessons learned thus far. In April 2013, a vibrant team of 13 librarians embarked on a Personal Librarian Pilot Project at the Rhodes University Library. The Personal Librarian Programme is primarily directed at undergraduate students at Rhodes University. In an attempt to bridge the information literacy skills gap that exists between Senior School and University in South Africa, the idea behind this programme is that each incoming first year student is assigned a Personal Librarian who will remain that individual’s contact in the library throughout his/her academic career at Rhodes University. The project came about as a result of research exploring the perceptions of both students and lecturers in the Commerce Faculty at Rhodes University with regard to Information Literacy practices and needs (Gontshi, 2011). The study revealed and recorded a shortcoming in the Information Literacy ability of students between Senior School Level and University Level. It became clear that new University students were not aware of the important link between their academic studies and the Library which in turn suggested the need to make Rhodes University librarians and the role that they play in the academic world more obvious to these new students (Gontshi, 2011). The Personal Librarian Programme was devised to fill this need. The Librarians involved in this programme include staff from all sections of the Library: circulation, faculty liaison and bibliographic/technical services. The training needs of staff who did not work directly with students were identified and the relevant training provided. The staff from Circulation and Bibliographic/Technical services sections identified a need to advance their knowledge on the use of library from a users’ perspective. The training focused on the following: “Brainstorming a research topic with a student”; “Identifying relevant databases to conduct a research topic” and “Conducting a search on relevant databases for the research topic” – this included ‘different ways of devising an effective search technique’. The training ensured a good foundation for these librarians to develop their confidence to work with users. The project, modeled on a similar programme at the Yale University Library in America, was also a direct result of Rhodes University Library’s involvement in the Carnegie Research Libraries Consortium (2009 – 2011) and a ten-week internship in the United States, seven weeks of which were spent at Yale University.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2013
What to expect when you’re not expecting : child-freedom, social stigma, and online subjectivities
- Authors: Morison, Tracy
- Date: 2013
- Language: English
- Type: Conference paper , text
- Identifier: vital:6210 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1003915
- Description: From Introduction: Today I’m presenting some of the preliminary findings of a study about voluntary childlessness conducted with Indian, Polish, and fellow South African collaborators. Voluntary childlessness is also frequently referred to as being childless by choice or childfree. The term childfree (as opposed to ‘childless’) is intended to show that not having children “can be an active and fulfilling choice”, and to indicate agency and freedom from social obligation. The distinguishing feature of voluntary childlessness is the deliberate avoidance of parenthood, and this is precisely what opens up childfree people, especially married heterosexuals, to greater stigma than the temporarily or involuntarily childless, since it is seen as willing and deliberate deviation from the norm. Having children is seen as a natural consequence of being a “normal” heterosexual woman or man, as well as an expected outcome of marriage. Parenthood is therefore normalised by regulative discourses around sexuality and gender. This process of normalisation is reinforced by pronatalist discourse. According to Meyers, pronatalism rests upon twin strategies: The first is the valorisation or glorification of parenthood, which supports the belief that having children is the only true path to fulfilment. The second strategy is the denigration of non-reproduction in which childlessness is cast as horrific. The result of these dual strategies is to eliminate deliberate childlessness as a possibility. Parenthood, as the only truly viable option for a fulfilling life, is therefore a non-choice. This is compounded by nationalistic and religious rhetoric that constructs childbearing as an obligation or duty. Consequently, as my previous research showed, people often do not reflect on whether to have children or not, but see it more as a matter of timing.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2013
- Authors: Morison, Tracy
- Date: 2013
- Language: English
- Type: Conference paper , text
- Identifier: vital:6210 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1003915
- Description: From Introduction: Today I’m presenting some of the preliminary findings of a study about voluntary childlessness conducted with Indian, Polish, and fellow South African collaborators. Voluntary childlessness is also frequently referred to as being childless by choice or childfree. The term childfree (as opposed to ‘childless’) is intended to show that not having children “can be an active and fulfilling choice”, and to indicate agency and freedom from social obligation. The distinguishing feature of voluntary childlessness is the deliberate avoidance of parenthood, and this is precisely what opens up childfree people, especially married heterosexuals, to greater stigma than the temporarily or involuntarily childless, since it is seen as willing and deliberate deviation from the norm. Having children is seen as a natural consequence of being a “normal” heterosexual woman or man, as well as an expected outcome of marriage. Parenthood is therefore normalised by regulative discourses around sexuality and gender. This process of normalisation is reinforced by pronatalist discourse. According to Meyers, pronatalism rests upon twin strategies: The first is the valorisation or glorification of parenthood, which supports the belief that having children is the only true path to fulfilment. The second strategy is the denigration of non-reproduction in which childlessness is cast as horrific. The result of these dual strategies is to eliminate deliberate childlessness as a possibility. Parenthood, as the only truly viable option for a fulfilling life, is therefore a non-choice. This is compounded by nationalistic and religious rhetoric that constructs childbearing as an obligation or duty. Consequently, as my previous research showed, people often do not reflect on whether to have children or not, but see it more as a matter of timing.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2013
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »