Sedimentology of plio-pleistocene gravel barrier deposits in the palaeo-Orange River mouth, Namibia : depositional history and diamond mineralisation
- Authors: Spaggiari, Renato Igino
- Date: 2011 , 2013-08-19
- Subjects: Diamond mines and mining -- Namibia Sediments (Geology) -- South Africa and Namibia -- Orange River Estuary Diamond deposits -- Namibia Orange River Estuary (Namibia and South Africa)
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: vital:4927 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1004636
- Description: The largest known marine diamond placer, the Namibian mega-placer, lies along the Atlantic coast of south-western Africa from the Orange River mouth 1,000 km northwards to the Namibian-Angolan border. The most economically viable portion of the Namibian mega-placer (>75 million carats recovered at >95% gem quality) comprises onshore and offshore marine deposits that are developed within ∼100km of the Orange River outfall. For much of the Cainozoic, this long-lived fluvial system has been the main conduit transporting diamonds from kimberlitic and secondary sources in the cratonic hinterland of southern Africa to the Atlantic shelf that has been neutrally buoyant over this period. Highly energetic marine processes, driven in part, by southerly winds with an attendant northward-directed longshore drift, have generated terminal placers that are preserved both onshore and offshore. This study, through detailed field sedimentological and diamond analyses, investigates the development and mineralisation of gravel barrier deposits within the ancestral Orange River mouth area during a major ∼30 m regional transgression ('30 m Package') in the Late Pliocene. At that time, diamond supply from this fluvial conduit was minimal, yet the corresponding onshore marine deposits to the north of the Orange River mouth were significantly diamond enriched, enabling large-scale alluvial diamond mining to take place for over 75 years. Of the entire coastline of south-western Africa, the most complete accumulation of the '30 m Package' is preserved within the palaeo-Orange River mouth as barrier spit and barrier beach deposits. Arranged vertically and laterally in a 16m thick succession, these are deposits of: (1) intertidal beach, (2) lagoon and washover, (3) tidal inlet and spit recurve and (4) storm-dominated subtidal settings. These were parts of larger barrier features, the bulk of which are preserved as highstand deposits that are diamond-bearing with varying, but generally low grades (<13 stones (diamonds) per hundred tons, spht). Intertidal beach and spit recurve deposits have higher economic grades (12-13 spht) due to the energetic sieving and mobile trapping mechanisms associated with their emplacement. In contrast, the less reworked and more sandy subtidal, tidal inlet and washover deposits have un-economic grades (<2 spht). Despite these low grades, the barrier deposits have the largest average stone (diamond) size (1-2 carats/stone, cts/stn) of the entire Namibian mega-placer, given their proximity to the ancestral Orange River outfall. This study demonstrates that barrier shoreline evolution at the fluvial/marine interface was controlled by: (1) a strong and coarse fluvial sediment supply that sustained shoreline growth on a highly energetic coast, (2) accommodation space facilitating sediment preservation and (3) short-duration, high-frequency sea-level cycles superimposed on the∼30 m regional transgression, promoting hierarchal stacking of progradational deposits. During these sea-level fluctuations, diamonds were 'farmed' from older, shelf sequences in the offshore and driven landward to accumulate in '30 m Package' highstand barrier deposits. In spite of the large supply of diamonds, their retention in these deposits was poor due to an incompetent footwall of ancestral Orange River mouth sediment and the inherent cobble-boulder size of the barrier gravels. Thus the principal process controlling diamond entrapment in these barrier deposits was kinetic sieving in a coarse-grained framework. Consequently, at the marine/fluvial interface and down-drift for ∼5 km, larger diamonds (1-2 cts/stn) were retained in low-grade (<2 spht), coarse-gravel barrier shorelines. Smaller diamonds (mostly < I cts/stn) were rejected into the northward-driven littoral sediments and further size-sorted along ∼95 km of Namibian coast to accumulate in finer, high-grade beach placers (> 100 spht) where bedrock footwall promoted such high concentrations. The gravel-dominated palaeo-Orange River mouth is considered to be the ' heart' of the Namibian mega-placer, controlling sediment and diamond supply to the littoral zone further north. Although coarse gravel is retained at the river mouth, the incompetence of this highly energetic setting to trap diamonds renders it sub-economic. This ineffectiveness at the fluvial/marine interface is thus fundamental in enriching the coastal tract farther down-drift and developing highly economic coastal placers along the Atlantic coast of south-western Africa. , KMBT_363 , Adobe Acrobat 9.54 Paper Capture Plug-in
- Full Text:
- Authors: Spaggiari, Renato Igino
- Date: 2011 , 2013-08-19
- Subjects: Diamond mines and mining -- Namibia Sediments (Geology) -- South Africa and Namibia -- Orange River Estuary Diamond deposits -- Namibia Orange River Estuary (Namibia and South Africa)
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: vital:4927 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1004636
- Description: The largest known marine diamond placer, the Namibian mega-placer, lies along the Atlantic coast of south-western Africa from the Orange River mouth 1,000 km northwards to the Namibian-Angolan border. The most economically viable portion of the Namibian mega-placer (>75 million carats recovered at >95% gem quality) comprises onshore and offshore marine deposits that are developed within ∼100km of the Orange River outfall. For much of the Cainozoic, this long-lived fluvial system has been the main conduit transporting diamonds from kimberlitic and secondary sources in the cratonic hinterland of southern Africa to the Atlantic shelf that has been neutrally buoyant over this period. Highly energetic marine processes, driven in part, by southerly winds with an attendant northward-directed longshore drift, have generated terminal placers that are preserved both onshore and offshore. This study, through detailed field sedimentological and diamond analyses, investigates the development and mineralisation of gravel barrier deposits within the ancestral Orange River mouth area during a major ∼30 m regional transgression ('30 m Package') in the Late Pliocene. At that time, diamond supply from this fluvial conduit was minimal, yet the corresponding onshore marine deposits to the north of the Orange River mouth were significantly diamond enriched, enabling large-scale alluvial diamond mining to take place for over 75 years. Of the entire coastline of south-western Africa, the most complete accumulation of the '30 m Package' is preserved within the palaeo-Orange River mouth as barrier spit and barrier beach deposits. Arranged vertically and laterally in a 16m thick succession, these are deposits of: (1) intertidal beach, (2) lagoon and washover, (3) tidal inlet and spit recurve and (4) storm-dominated subtidal settings. These were parts of larger barrier features, the bulk of which are preserved as highstand deposits that are diamond-bearing with varying, but generally low grades (<13 stones (diamonds) per hundred tons, spht). Intertidal beach and spit recurve deposits have higher economic grades (12-13 spht) due to the energetic sieving and mobile trapping mechanisms associated with their emplacement. In contrast, the less reworked and more sandy subtidal, tidal inlet and washover deposits have un-economic grades (<2 spht). Despite these low grades, the barrier deposits have the largest average stone (diamond) size (1-2 carats/stone, cts/stn) of the entire Namibian mega-placer, given their proximity to the ancestral Orange River outfall. This study demonstrates that barrier shoreline evolution at the fluvial/marine interface was controlled by: (1) a strong and coarse fluvial sediment supply that sustained shoreline growth on a highly energetic coast, (2) accommodation space facilitating sediment preservation and (3) short-duration, high-frequency sea-level cycles superimposed on the∼30 m regional transgression, promoting hierarchal stacking of progradational deposits. During these sea-level fluctuations, diamonds were 'farmed' from older, shelf sequences in the offshore and driven landward to accumulate in '30 m Package' highstand barrier deposits. In spite of the large supply of diamonds, their retention in these deposits was poor due to an incompetent footwall of ancestral Orange River mouth sediment and the inherent cobble-boulder size of the barrier gravels. Thus the principal process controlling diamond entrapment in these barrier deposits was kinetic sieving in a coarse-grained framework. Consequently, at the marine/fluvial interface and down-drift for ∼5 km, larger diamonds (1-2 cts/stn) were retained in low-grade (<2 spht), coarse-gravel barrier shorelines. Smaller diamonds (mostly < I cts/stn) were rejected into the northward-driven littoral sediments and further size-sorted along ∼95 km of Namibian coast to accumulate in finer, high-grade beach placers (> 100 spht) where bedrock footwall promoted such high concentrations. The gravel-dominated palaeo-Orange River mouth is considered to be the ' heart' of the Namibian mega-placer, controlling sediment and diamond supply to the littoral zone further north. Although coarse gravel is retained at the river mouth, the incompetence of this highly energetic setting to trap diamonds renders it sub-economic. This ineffectiveness at the fluvial/marine interface is thus fundamental in enriching the coastal tract farther down-drift and developing highly economic coastal placers along the Atlantic coast of south-western Africa. , KMBT_363 , Adobe Acrobat 9.54 Paper Capture Plug-in
- Full Text:
Melatonin and anticancer therapy interactions with 5-Fluorouracil
- Authors: Cassim, Layla
- Date: 2008
- Subjects: Melatonin Melatonin -- Therapeutic use Antineoplastic agents Fluorouracil Fluorouracil -- Toxicology Cancer -- Treatment
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: vital:3746 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1003224
- Description: On the basis of clinical studies, some researchers have advocated that the neurohormone and antioxidant melatonin, shown to possess intrinsic anticancer properties, be used as co-therapy in cancer patients being treated with the antineoplastic agent 5-fluorouracil, as increased patient survival times and enhanced quality of life have been observed. The focus of this research was thus to investigate the mechanisms of this seemingly beneficial drug interaction between 5-fluorouracil and melatonin. Metabolism studies were undertaken, in which it was established that there is no hepatic metabolic drug interaction between these agents by cytochrome P450, and that neither agent alters the activity of this enzyme system. Co-therapy with melatonin is thus unlikely to alter plasma levels of 5-fluorouracil by this mechanism. Novel mechanisms by which 5-fluorouracil is toxic were elucidated, such as the induction of lipid peroxidation, due to the formation of reactive oxygen species; decreases in brain serotonin, dopamine and norepinephrine levels, possibly leading to depression; hippocampal shrinkage and morphological alterations and lysis of hippocampal cells, which may underlie cognitive impairment; and a reduction in the nociceptive threshold when administered acutely. All these deleterious effects are attenuated by the co-administration of melatonin, suggesting that the agent exhibits antidepressive and analgesic properties, in addition to its known antioxidative and free radical-scavenging abilities. This suggests that melatonin cotherapy can significantly decrease 5-fluorouracil-induced toxicity, but this may also exert a protective effect on cancer cells and thus compromise the anticancer efficacy of 5-fluorouracil. It was, furthermore, found that stimulation of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity, mediated by increases in superoxide anion and interferon-γ levels, may underlie resistance to 5-fluorouracil therapy. Melatonin was shown to increase superoxide anion levels in vivo, and this is believed to be by conversion to the metabolite and known oxidant 6- hydroxymelatonin. This highlights that the possible deleterious effects of melatonin metabolites should be studied further. Serum corticosterone levels and cytokine profiles are unaltered by both 5-FU and melatonin, suggesting that these agents may be used by HIV infected individuals without promoting the progression to AIDS. It can thus be concluded that melatonin co-therapy is potentially useful in countering 5-fluorouracil toxicity.
- Full Text:
- Authors: Cassim, Layla
- Date: 2008
- Subjects: Melatonin Melatonin -- Therapeutic use Antineoplastic agents Fluorouracil Fluorouracil -- Toxicology Cancer -- Treatment
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: vital:3746 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1003224
- Description: On the basis of clinical studies, some researchers have advocated that the neurohormone and antioxidant melatonin, shown to possess intrinsic anticancer properties, be used as co-therapy in cancer patients being treated with the antineoplastic agent 5-fluorouracil, as increased patient survival times and enhanced quality of life have been observed. The focus of this research was thus to investigate the mechanisms of this seemingly beneficial drug interaction between 5-fluorouracil and melatonin. Metabolism studies were undertaken, in which it was established that there is no hepatic metabolic drug interaction between these agents by cytochrome P450, and that neither agent alters the activity of this enzyme system. Co-therapy with melatonin is thus unlikely to alter plasma levels of 5-fluorouracil by this mechanism. Novel mechanisms by which 5-fluorouracil is toxic were elucidated, such as the induction of lipid peroxidation, due to the formation of reactive oxygen species; decreases in brain serotonin, dopamine and norepinephrine levels, possibly leading to depression; hippocampal shrinkage and morphological alterations and lysis of hippocampal cells, which may underlie cognitive impairment; and a reduction in the nociceptive threshold when administered acutely. All these deleterious effects are attenuated by the co-administration of melatonin, suggesting that the agent exhibits antidepressive and analgesic properties, in addition to its known antioxidative and free radical-scavenging abilities. This suggests that melatonin cotherapy can significantly decrease 5-fluorouracil-induced toxicity, but this may also exert a protective effect on cancer cells and thus compromise the anticancer efficacy of 5-fluorouracil. It was, furthermore, found that stimulation of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity, mediated by increases in superoxide anion and interferon-γ levels, may underlie resistance to 5-fluorouracil therapy. Melatonin was shown to increase superoxide anion levels in vivo, and this is believed to be by conversion to the metabolite and known oxidant 6- hydroxymelatonin. This highlights that the possible deleterious effects of melatonin metabolites should be studied further. Serum corticosterone levels and cytokine profiles are unaltered by both 5-FU and melatonin, suggesting that these agents may be used by HIV infected individuals without promoting the progression to AIDS. It can thus be concluded that melatonin co-therapy is potentially useful in countering 5-fluorouracil toxicity.
- Full Text:
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »