- Title
- Faecal source tracking and water quality in the Eastern Cape, South Africa
- Creator
- Luyt, Catherine Diane
- ThesisAdvisor
- Tandlich, Roman
- Subject
- Water quality -- South Africa -- Grahamstown
- Subject
- Waterborne infection -- Management
- Subject
- Drinking water -- Contamination -- South Africa -- Grahamstown
- Date
- 2013
- Type
- Thesis
- Type
- Doctoral
- Type
- PhD
- Identifier
- vital:6052
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1018242
- Description
- Water quality is concerning as many still lack access to safe drinking water. Alternate sources such as rivers (FC up to 1600 CFUs/100 mL) and rainwater are often polluted. Rainwater tanks require maintenance to improve water quality, but could be used for non-potable purposes or irrigation. Grahamstown infrastructural failures initiate deviations from DWAF 1996 domestic water guidelines for microorganisms within the distribution system. Frequent testing can decrease risks of waterborne diseases. Limitations to this are inaccessibility of rural areas, distances from testing centres and costs. The low cost H2S strip test able to be used onsite by communities, may aid in risk assessment. H2S strip test results are not affected by sulphate (14 to 4240 mg/L) or nitrite (up to 47 mg/L). Transportation of the H2S strip tests between 10 and 32°C does not modify results significantly. Similarly to other studies: Klebsiella spp.; Enterobacter spp. and Serratia spp. were isolated from H2S strip tests. The mH2S strip test corresponds best with HPC in treated water, while in untreated river water it has approximately 90% correspondence with FCs, while survival of FC causes discrepancies with the H2S test after 22 days. A faecal coliform inactivation rate of 0.1 CFUs/ day, may be longer than many pathogens. Faecal source tracking, not currently practised in South Africa, could aid health risk assessments for disaster management, which would improve the NMMP programme. Bacterial survival times could propose the time period for which water is unsafe. Bifidobacteria and Rhodococcus are proposed to help identify the faecal pollution source. But enumeration of Rhodococcus is too lengthy (21 days). The tracking ratio of bifidobacteria (between 0.1 to 6.25) is not source definitive. The bifidobacteria survival rate, could indicator the time since faecal pollution. The bifidobacteria average survival rate is 2.3 CFUs per day for both groups. The culturability and selectivity of agar is still poor, with total bifidobacteria less selectively culturable. Enterococci overgrowth of TB was decreased by Beerens media. SUB is still useful to identify potential human faecal inputs. A single tracking method is thus not suitable alone, but requires a combination of techniques.
- Format
- 268 leaves, pdf
- Publisher
- Rhodes University, Faculty of Science, Institute for Water Research
- Language
- English
- Rights
- Luyt, Catherine Diane
- Hits: 1509
- Visitors: 1599
- Downloads: 317
Collections
RU Institute for Water Research, including the Unilever Centre for Environmental Water Quality (IWR)
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details | SOURCEPDF | 1 MB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details |