- Title
- A comparative study of the dosimetric features of α-Al2O3: C, Mg and α-Al2O3: C
- Creator
- Kalita, Jitumani M, Chithambo, Makaiko L
- Date
- 2017
- Type
- text
- Type
- article
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/10962/113058
- Identifier
- vital:33694
- Identifier
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncx039
- Description
- A comparative study of the dosimetric features of α-Al2O3:C,Mg and α-Al2O3:C relevant to thermoluminescence dosimetry is reported. A glow curve of α-Al2O3:C,Mg measured at 1°C/s after beta irradiation to 1 Gy shows two subsidiary peaks at 42°C (labelled as I) and 72°C (II) and the main peak at 161°C (III) whereas a glow curve of α-Al2O3:C measured under the same conditions shows the main peak at 178°C (II′) and a lower intensity peak at 48°C (I′). Apart from these ones, there are several other peaks at temperatures beyond that of the main peak in both α-Al2O3:C,Mg and α-Al2O3:C. However, the latter are not included in this study. We report a comparative quantitative analysis of dose response and fading of peaks I, II and III of α-Al2O3:C,Mg and peaks I′ and II′ of α-Al2O3:C. Analysis shows that the dose response of peaks I and III is sublinear within 1–10 Gy whereas that of peak II is superlinear within 1–4 Gy followed by a sublinear region within 4–10 Gy. In comparison, the dose response of peak I′ is superlinear within 1–4 Gy followed by a sublinear region within 4–10 Gy whereas that of peak II′ is sublinear within 1–4 Gy followed by a superlinear region within 4–10 Gy. As regards to fading corresponding to 1 Gy, peak I is very unstable and fades within 300 s, peak II is more stable and takes up to 43200 s to fade. In comparison, peak III fades down to 30% of its initial intensity within 2400 s. Interestingly, between 2400 and 800 s, the intensity fades by 17% only. Regarding fading in α-Al2O3:C, peak I′ fades within 600 s whereas peak II′ shows an inverse fading behaviour up to 64800 s. The rate of fading for peaks I, II and III in α-Al2O3:C,Mg was found to decrease with increase in dose. However, no such behaviour was observed in α-Al2O3:C. The fading in both samples is discussed on the basis of a charge hopping mechanism.
- Format
- 11 pages, pdf
- Language
- English
- Relation
- Radiation protection dosimetry, Kalita, J.M. and Chithambo, M.L., 2017. A comparative study of the dosimetric features of α-Al2O3: C, Mg and α-Al2O3: C. Radiation protection dosimetry, 177(3), pp.261-271., Radiation protection dosimetry volume 177 number 3 261 271 December 2017 1742-3406
- Rights
- Authors
- Rights
- Use of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the Oxford Academic Journals Open Access Statement (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access)
- Hits: 1790
- Visitors: 1937
- Downloads: 160
Collections
RU Department of Physics and Electronics
Chithambo, Makaiko Liwiro (Distinguished Prof)
SDG 09. Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details | SOURCE1 | A comparative study of the dosimetric features of α-Al2O3.pdf | 750 KB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details |