Potential impact and host range of Pereskiophaga brasiliensis Anderson (Curculionidae): a new candidate biological control agent for the control of Pereskia aculeata Miller (Cactaceae) in South Africa
- Authors: Mdodana, Lumka Anita
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Curculionidae -- South Africa , Cactus -- South Africa , Biological pest control agents , Alien plants-- South Africa , Pereskiophaga brasiliensis Anderson (Curculionidae) , Pereskia aculeata Miller (Cactaceae)
- Language: English
- Type: text , Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/62350 , vital:28157
- Description: Pereskia aculeata Miller (Cactaceae) is a damaging invasive alien plant in South Africa that has negative impacts to indigenous biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Mechanical and chemical control are not effective against P. aculeata so biological control is considered the only viable option. Two biological control agents, the leaf-feeding beetle Phenrica guerini Bechyne (Chrysomelidae) and the stem-wilting bug Catorhintha schaffneri (Coreidae), have been released in South Africa thus far. Post-release evaluations have indicated that P. guerini will not reduce P. aculeata densities to acceptable levels alone, while C. schaffneri was released very recently, so it is too soon to determine how effective that agent will be. Even if C. schaffneri is extremely damaging, it is likely that further agents will be required to reduce the densities of P. aculeata to acceptable levels within a reasonable time-scale. Additional agents should target the woody stems of P. aculeata which are not impacted by the damage of either of the released agents. Pereskiophaga brasiliensis Anderson (Curculionidae) is a promising potential candidate agent that feeds on the thick woody stems of the plant in the larval stage. Climatic matching, genetic matching and field based host specificity observations all indicated that P. brasiliensis was a promising candidate. In this study, the impact of P. brasiliensis to the target weed, P. aculeata, was quantified under quarantine conditions to determine whether it was sufficiently damaging to warrant release. This was followed by host specificity testing to determine whether P. brasiliensis was suitably host specific for release in South Africa. Impact studies indicated that P. brasiliensis was damaging to P. aculeata at insect densities that would be expected in the field. Pereskiophaga brasiliensis reduced the number of leaves of P. aculeata to a greater extent than it reduced shoot lengths, but both plant parameters were significantly reduced due to the feeding damage from the insect. This suggests that the damage from P. brasiliensis may be compatible with that of C. schaffneri which reduces shoot length to a greater degree than the number of leaves. Pereskiophaga brasiliensis is therefore sufficiently damaging to warrant release, and although interaction studies with the other agents would be required, it is expected that it should complement other existing agents. Although P. brasiliensis is sufficiently damaging, at present the host specificity data indicates that it is not suitably specific for release in South Africa because oviposition and larval development to the adult stage was recorded on both indigenous and alien plant species within the families Cactaceae and Basellaceae. This non-target feeding was recorded during no-choice tests, which are very conservative, but significant non-target damage and development to the adult stage was recorded on an indigenous plant from a different family to the target weed. Further host specificity testing, including paired and multiple choice tests, are required to confirm the broad host range of P. brasiliensis. Other biological control agents that damage the woody stems of P. aculeata should be considered. The stem-borer, Acanthodoxus machacalis (Cerambycidae) is considered the most promising of the other candidate agents as it can be sourced from a climatically matched region where genetically suitable P. aculeata plants are found, it is sufficiently damaging to the woody stems of P. aculeata and there is no evidence that the species has a broad host range. Acanthodoxus machacalis should be sourced from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and imported into quarantine in South Africa for host specificity testing.
- Full Text:
Interactions between two biological control agents released on Pereskia aculeata Miller (Cactaceae), in South Africa
- Authors: Mnqeta, Zezethu
- Date: 2017
- Subjects: Pereskia aculeata -- Biological control , Cactus -- Biological control -- South Africa , Alien plants -- Biological control -- South Africa , Flea beetles -- South Africa , Coreidae -- South Africa , Insects as biological pest control agents -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: text , Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/7949 , vital:21327
- Description: Pereskia aculeata Miller (Cactaceae) is an alien invasive plant introduced into South Africa from Brazil, which has negative impacts on native biodiversity in South Africa. Phenrica guerini Bechyne (Chrysomelidae) and Catorhintha schaffneri Brailovsky & Garcia (Coreidae) are two biological control agents released against P. aculeata in South Africa. Phenrica guerini was first released against P. aculeata, in 1991, followed by C. schaffneri in 2014. The overall aim of this study was to improve the biological control programme against P. aculeata in order to decrease its density to a level where it does not threaten the native biodiversity of South Africa. The first part of this study evaluated the efficacy of P. guerini on P. aculeata at Port Alfred (Eastern Cape) to better understand the role of P. guerini in the biological control of P. aculeata. An insecticide exclusion experiment was conducted over 100 days. Plots with P. guerini had a mean of 187 (SE ± 62) fewer leaves/m2 than plots without P. guerini. The agent reduced percentage cover in plots with P. guerini, with a mean of 19.42% (SE ± 3.15) lower cover than plots without P. guerini. Although P. guerini had an impact on P. aculeata at Port Alfred previous studies have indicated that a reduction to below 50% cover is required for native biodiversity to recover and the agent only reduced cover to 62% at Port Alfred. Phenrica guerini has therefore not reduced percentage cover sufficiently to completely control the weed. The data collected from Port Alfred was compared to the performance of the agent nationwide. Although P. guerini was found at far more sites than previously recorded, there were very few sites with comparable levels of damage to Port Alfred. This evidence suggests that P. guerini is not sufficiently damaging to reduce P. aculeata to acceptable levels and other biological control agents should be considered.Interactions between two biological control agents can have complex and unexpected impacts for a biological control programme. The second part of this study was to investigate interactions between C. schaffneri and P. guerini under laboratory conditions to test whether the two agents, individually or jointly, enhanced or reduced their impact on P. aculeata. Potted P. aculeata plants were exposed to one of four treatments: control (no agents), P. guerini only, C. schaffneri only and both species in combination. Four stocking densities, ranging from 2 to 12 insects per plant were used. Catorhintha schaffneri alone at high densities was more damaging than all other treatments with a significantly greater reduction in the mean number of leaves, 11.7 (SE ± 1.29), and shoot lengths, 2.17cm (SE ± O. 75). Even at lower density treatments, the combination of the two agents was not significantly more damaging than C. schaffneri alone and C. schaffneri was always more damaging than P. guerini alone. Mortality of P. guerini was significantly higher than C. schaffneri at the highest stocking density when in combination. Phenrica guerini contributes towards the biological control of P. aculeata at some sites in South Africa but not enough to completely control the weed. The antagonistic interaction between P. guerini and C. schaffneri suggests that these agents should not be released together because this would impact negatively on the overall biocontrol programme against P. aculeata. Catorhintha schaffneri should be released at sites were P. guerini is not present and evaluations of the success of this agent in the field should be conducted. Extrapolation of laboratory-based studies into the field is often challenging so mass-rearing of P. guerini should continue until there is convincing proof that C. schaffneri alone is more effective than P. guerini in the field.
- Full Text: