Developing social indicators for the evaluation of natural resource management programmes using a capability approach in the Eastern Cape, South Africa
- Authors: Human, Johanna Susanna
- Date: 2020
- Subjects: Environmental education -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , Natural resources -- Management -- Study and teaching (Continuing education) -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , Sustainable development -- Study and teaching (Continuing education) -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , Environmental economics -- Study and teaching (Continuing education) -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , Subsistence farming -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , Watersheds -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape , Capabilities approach (Social sciences) , Tsitsa River Catchment (Eastern Cape, South Africa)
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MEd
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/147348 , vital:38628
- Description: The dissertation investigates how the capability approach can be used to develop social indicators for a natural resource management (NRM) programme. The study aimed to develop an understanding of what the beneficiaries of the programme value being and doing to guide the development of social indicators that will take into consideration their personal development aspirations. These valued beings and doings were then overlaid with the programme goals and objectives to identify and select the final indicators. The study was situated in the Tsitsa catchment in the Eastern Cape, South Africa and was part of a natural resource management programme, focused on land restoration and avoided degradation. Methods used to collect data for this study and develop an understanding of what the residents’ valued beings and doings were, included semi-structured interviews, workshops and document analysis. The research population was non-homogenous. I tried to include voices representing different prominent groups of land users in the study. This included established commercial farmers, emerging commercial farmers, commercial forestry, residents residing in communal areas and engaged with subsistence farming and residents from these communal areas who are now residing elsewhere but continue to have connections to the catchment. Understanding the voices of these different groups who reside in the catchment was important to develop an inclusive understanding of what residents of the catchment valued beings and doings were. The research process was supported by participatory approaches. This process, and the lessons learnt during the research process, were valuable for the further development and implementation of the planned participatory monitoring evaluation reflection and learning (PMERL) framework. The research process involved learning from the research participants about their valued beings and doings and what was important for the programme implementers. Some of the research participants from the Rhodes University implementation team (RUIT) were also involved in selecting the indicators they thought the programme should monitor. Overall, using the capability approach helped me to gain insight and understanding with regard to what the valued beings and doings are for the residents of the catchment and what they would like development programmes, such as the Tsitsa Project, to address. It was surprising to find many areas of overlap between the valued beings and doings of the different residents in the catchment, as well as the similarities between these and the goals and objectives of the Tsitsa Project. In conclusion, using the capability approach was useful to learn what was important for the residents of the catchment to help develop the social indicators but also to learn how to guide and steer participatory monitoring and evaluation processes in the future.
- Full Text:
Research Projects Portfolio.
- Authors: Schudel, Ingrid Joan
- Date: 2000
- Subjects: Environmental education -- South Africa -- Eastern Cape
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MEd
- Identifier: vital:2015 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1016368
- Description: This collection of research projects tells a story of the time I have spent with members of the Albany Working for Water team; including preparations made, lessons learned and insights gained. My first project was to analyse the methodology of a research paper. I chose the paper by Arjen Wals because I intended, like him, to examine people's perceptions of environmental issues. From this paper I gained ideas for a qualitative research process and learnt the importance of theoretical and methodological consistency. My next project was to present a report on my research into the perceptions of workrelated environmental issues among the Albany Working for Water workers. From this research I gained insight into the knowledge of the workers and also some of the misconceptions that they have about social and ecological issues. I made educational recommendations based on these insights. This experience inspired me to initiate a play with a group of the workers about alien plant eradication. The process of developing this play formed the basis for a research paper that I have submitted as another research project. Concurrent with the development of the play, I conducted a fourth research project that was a situational analysis of the Albany Workingfor Water Project. I hoped that this analysis would provide useful insight into the context of the above two projects. Overall, I hope the story reflects how I have grown through the learning experiences I shared with the Albany Working for Water team. I would like to extend to my thanks to all those who assisted and shared my journey with me.
- Full Text: