- Title
- Genetic analysis and field application of a UV-tolerant strain of CrleGV for improved control of Thaumatotibia leucotreta
- Creator
- Bennett, Tahnee Tashia
- ThesisAdvisor
- Hill, M P
- ThesisAdvisor
- Moore, Sean
- ThesisAdvisor
- Jukes, Michael David
- Subject
- Cryptophlebia leucotreta Biological control
- Subject
- Pests Integrated control
- Subject
- Biological pest control agents
- Subject
- Ultraviolet radiation
- Subject
- Oligonucleotides
- Date
- 2022-10-14
- Type
- Academic theses
- Type
- Master's theses
- Type
- text
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/10962/362741
- Identifier
- vital:65358
- Description
- Thaumatotibia leucotreta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), also known as false codling moth (FCM), is indigenous to sub-Saharan Africa. Thaumatotibia leucotreta has been controlled through an integrated pest management (IPM) programme, which includes chemical control, sterile insect technique (SIT), cultural and biological control. As part of the biological control, a key component is the use of Cryptophlebia leucotreta granulovirus (CrleGV-SA). Currently, CryptogranTM, a commercial formulation of CrleGV, is the preferred product to use in South Africa for the control of T. leucotreta. The registration of the biopesticide Cryptogran (River bioscience, South Africa) was established after conducting extensive field trials with CrleGV-SA. One of the major factors affecting the baculovirus efficacy in the field is UV irradiation. A UV-tolerant Cryptophlebia leucotreta granulovirus (CrleGV-SA-C5) isolate was isolated after consecutive cycles of UV exposure. This UV-tolerant isolate is genetically distinct from the CrleGV-SA isolate. The CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate has the potential as a biological control agent. The control of T. leucotreta in South Africa could be improved by the development of novel isolates into new biopesticide formulations. To date, there has not been any field trials conducted on the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate. Therefore, it is important to determine the biological and genetic stability of this isolate and to conduct field trials with CrleGV-SA- C5 to test the efficacy of the isolate before possible production into a biopesticide. A de novo assembly was conducted to reassemble the genome of CrleGV-SA-C5 which was followed by a sequence comparison with the CrleGV-SA genome. The identification of SNPs, led to the design of oligonucleotides flanking the regions where the SNPs were detected. Polymerase chain reaction amplification of the target regions was conducted using the oligonucleotides. After sequence comparison, seven SNPs were detected and PCR amplification was successful using the three oligonucleotides, Pif-2, HypoP and Lef-8/HP. To differentiate between CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA genomes and confirm the presence of the SNPs, two methods of screening were conducted. The first was the construction of six plasmids, the plasmids contained the targeted pif-2, HypoP, and the Lef-8/HP insert regions from both the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA genome region where the SNPs were identified, followed by sequencing. The Five recombinant plasmids, pC5_Pif-2, pSA_Pif-2, pC5_HypoP, pSA_HypoP, and pC5_Lef-8/HP were successfully sequenced. No amplicon was obtained for one of the plasmids used as template (pSA_Lef-8/HP) and therefore the PCR product used for cloning was sequenced instead. Sequence alignment confirmed the presence of four of the five targeted SNPs in the genome of the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate. However, of these only one SNP (UV_7) rendered a suitable marker for the differentiation between the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA isolates as the SNPs, UV_2, UV_3 and UV_5, were also present in the CrleGV- SA sequences. The second screening method was a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) melt curve analysis to differentiate between the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA isolates. qPCR melt curve analysis was done using the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA HypoP PCR products. This technique was unable to differentiate between the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA isolates. However, this may be as a result of sequence data confirming that SNP UV_5 originally identified in the CrleGV-SA-C5 HypoP region was identical to the SNP at the same position in the CrleGV-SA HypoP region. Following the differentiation of the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA isolates through two screening methods, the genetic integrity of the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate after two virus bulk-ups was determined by PCR amplification of the target regions in the bulk-up virus followed by sequencing. Prior to virus bulk-up, surface dose bioassays were conducted on 4th instar larvae and LC50 and LC90 values of 4.01 x 106 OBs/ml and 8.75 x 109 OBs/ml respectively were obtained. The CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate was then bulked up in fourth instar T. leucotreta larvae using the LC90 value that was determined. Sequencing of the target regions from the CrleGV- SA-C5_BU2 (bulk-up 2) was conducted. Sequencing results confirmed the presence of the target SNPs in the CrleGV-SA-C5_BU2 genome. The UV-tolerance of the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate in comparison to the CrleGV-SA isolate was evaluated by detached fruit bioassays under natural UV irradiation. Two detached fruit bioassays were set-up, a UV exposure and a non-UV exposure bioassay set-up. Three treatments were used for each bioassay set-up which were the viruses CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA and a ddH2O control. Statistical analysis indicated that there was no significant difference between the virus treatments in both the UV exposed detached fruit bioassay and the non-UV exposed detached fruit bioassay. This study is the second study to report on the de novo assembly of the CrleGV-SA-C5 and sequence comparison with the CrleGV-SA genome, and the first to report on the UV-tolerance of the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate by detached fruit bioassays. Future work could involve further evaluation of intraspecific genetic variability in the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate and to identify any additional SNPs present within the genome that can be used as suitable markers for differentiation between the CrleGV-SA-C5 and CrleGV-SA isolates. It was recognised that it is required to conduct further detached fruit bioassays and field trials, but with improved protocols, for the efficacy and UV-tolerance of the CrleGV-SA-C5 isolate to be conclusively determined.
- Description
- Thesis (MSc) -- Faculty of Science, Zoology and Entomology, 2022
- Format
- computer, online resource, application/pdf, 1 online resource (146 pages), pdf
- Publisher
- Rhodes University, Faculty of Science, Zoology and Entomology
- Language
- English
- Rights
- Bennett, Tahnee Tashia
- Rights
- Use of this resource is governed by the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons "Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike" License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/)
- Hits: 1393
- Visitors: 1433
- Downloads: 56
Collections
RU Department of Zoology and Entomology
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details | SOURCE1 | BENNETT-MSC-TR22-154.pdf | 3 MB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details |