Critical assessment of the quality of sustainability disclosures published by public entities in South Africa
- Authors: Nazer, Faith Catherine
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Sustainable development reporting , Auditing -- South Africa , Finance, Public -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MCom
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/32845 , vital:32372
- Description: This study was performed in light of the limited research available regarding the quality of sustainability reporting in the public sector, and particularly in South Africa; and due to the important role which the public sector should play in enhancing sustainable behaviour and consequently sustainability reporting. There have been definite developments in legislation and guidelines which aim to enhance the quality of published sustainability disclosures. Therefore, in light of these developments, the objective of this study was to evaluate whether there has been an improvement in the quality of sustainability disclosures published by selected South African public entities for the 2014 financial year compared to the 2008 financial year. This study used both qualitative and quantitative methods to collect and analyse data. The content analysis method was used in this study, with the coding frame being developed deductively through the use of existing sustainability reporting guidelines. The guidelines analysed and incorporated into the coding frame for this study were the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Generation 4 (G4) guideline and the integrated reporting framework. To ensure that the coding frame contained codes relevant to the South African context, the King III Report on Corporate Governance (King III) and the Johannesburg Stock Exchange Social Reporting Initiative (JSE SRI) were consulted, and reporting requirements incorporated into the coding frame. Ten Schedule 2 reports and twenty Schedule 3 reports were analysed using the coding frame developed. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the resulting data. The Spearman Rank Order Correlation and the Mann-Whitney U Test were used to test for possible statistical significance of the changes in the data observed. This study found a number of significant improvements in the quality of reporting of sustainability disclosures from 2008 to 2014. Significant improvements were noted in the areas of reporting relating to balanced economic and environmental disclosures as well as comparative social disclosures being made. There were also significantly more annual published reports labelled as integrated reports in 2014 as compared to 2008, and significantly more 2014 reports used the GRI guidelines, integrated reporting framework, King III or a combination of these in the preparation of the annual published report. Significantly more tables, graphs and diagrams were used in the disclosure of social and other related matters in 2014, which enhanced the clarity of the information reported. There were also significant improvements noted in the disclosures relating to strategic focus and future orientation of the 2014 annual published reports and in the number of non-economic performance targets included in the public entities’ performance reports. Significant improvement was also noted in the quality of overall social disclosures and specifically in the quality of social disclosures relating to labour practices and decent working conditions, and disclosures relating to the entity’s impacts on society. The word count used to disclose matters relating to stakeholder engagement and board practices, composition and remuneration saw significant increases from 2008 to 2014. Despite these improvements and consistent with prior literature, it is concluded that more needs to be done in respect of reporting on social and environmental impacts, through the use of sustainability reporting guidelines and effective stakeholder engagement. In addition, it is recommended that annual published reports aim to provide a more balanced picture of the reporting entity and that negative performance be discussed in more detail. More effort needs to be made in enhancing the reliability of the annual published reports as a whole, through obtaining external assurance on the social and environmental disclosures. Finally, politicians and decision-makers in the public sector need to address the key root causes which lead to poor quality reporting. The significant impact of the following factors on the quality of sustainability disclosures was noted: the public entity’s total asset value, its total revenue, its level of social and environmental impact, the form of the report used as well as the guidelines used to prepare the reports.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Nazer, Faith Catherine
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Sustainable development reporting , Auditing -- South Africa , Finance, Public -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MCom
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/32845 , vital:32372
- Description: This study was performed in light of the limited research available regarding the quality of sustainability reporting in the public sector, and particularly in South Africa; and due to the important role which the public sector should play in enhancing sustainable behaviour and consequently sustainability reporting. There have been definite developments in legislation and guidelines which aim to enhance the quality of published sustainability disclosures. Therefore, in light of these developments, the objective of this study was to evaluate whether there has been an improvement in the quality of sustainability disclosures published by selected South African public entities for the 2014 financial year compared to the 2008 financial year. This study used both qualitative and quantitative methods to collect and analyse data. The content analysis method was used in this study, with the coding frame being developed deductively through the use of existing sustainability reporting guidelines. The guidelines analysed and incorporated into the coding frame for this study were the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Generation 4 (G4) guideline and the integrated reporting framework. To ensure that the coding frame contained codes relevant to the South African context, the King III Report on Corporate Governance (King III) and the Johannesburg Stock Exchange Social Reporting Initiative (JSE SRI) were consulted, and reporting requirements incorporated into the coding frame. Ten Schedule 2 reports and twenty Schedule 3 reports were analysed using the coding frame developed. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the resulting data. The Spearman Rank Order Correlation and the Mann-Whitney U Test were used to test for possible statistical significance of the changes in the data observed. This study found a number of significant improvements in the quality of reporting of sustainability disclosures from 2008 to 2014. Significant improvements were noted in the areas of reporting relating to balanced economic and environmental disclosures as well as comparative social disclosures being made. There were also significantly more annual published reports labelled as integrated reports in 2014 as compared to 2008, and significantly more 2014 reports used the GRI guidelines, integrated reporting framework, King III or a combination of these in the preparation of the annual published report. Significantly more tables, graphs and diagrams were used in the disclosure of social and other related matters in 2014, which enhanced the clarity of the information reported. There were also significant improvements noted in the disclosures relating to strategic focus and future orientation of the 2014 annual published reports and in the number of non-economic performance targets included in the public entities’ performance reports. Significant improvement was also noted in the quality of overall social disclosures and specifically in the quality of social disclosures relating to labour practices and decent working conditions, and disclosures relating to the entity’s impacts on society. The word count used to disclose matters relating to stakeholder engagement and board practices, composition and remuneration saw significant increases from 2008 to 2014. Despite these improvements and consistent with prior literature, it is concluded that more needs to be done in respect of reporting on social and environmental impacts, through the use of sustainability reporting guidelines and effective stakeholder engagement. In addition, it is recommended that annual published reports aim to provide a more balanced picture of the reporting entity and that negative performance be discussed in more detail. More effort needs to be made in enhancing the reliability of the annual published reports as a whole, through obtaining external assurance on the social and environmental disclosures. Finally, politicians and decision-makers in the public sector need to address the key root causes which lead to poor quality reporting. The significant impact of the following factors on the quality of sustainability disclosures was noted: the public entity’s total asset value, its total revenue, its level of social and environmental impact, the form of the report used as well as the guidelines used to prepare the reports.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
Investigating variables that have impact on annual financial statement audit report outcomes in local government
- Authors: Sigcau, Ntsikelelo
- Date: 2013
- Subjects: Local finance -- South Africa -- Auditing , Finance, Public -- South Africa , Local government -- South Africa -- Finance
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MBA
- Identifier: vital:8906 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/d1021004
- Description: The third sphere of government (Local Government) has been persistently clouded by unfavourable Annual Financial Statement (AFS) audit reports. This results in local government losing credibility and its stakeholders losing confidence in the institutions or municipalities. In-depth analysis of the root cause of this dilemma is an opportunity for the municipality to reorganise its house and redeem its dignity and credibility to its stakeholders through addressing the identified challenges. The importance of the study can be attributed to the need to investigate the root causes of unfavourable audit opinion and recommend possible remedies that can assist municipalities to improve their audit report outcomes which in turn will improve the confidence of its stakeholders. The primary objective of the study was to investigate variables that impact on the audit report outcomes on annual financial statements of the municipalities that are within Alfred Nzo District (AND) Jurisdiction, including Alfred Nzo District Municipality (ANDM). This was achieved through investigating the root causes of the audit report outcomes with specific focus on the relationship that exists between the management role and audit outcomes of the Alfred Nzo District Municipalities. This was measured by the municipality’s leadership, governance, internal controls and human capital management. Convenient sampling was used wherein 150 questionnaires (30 per municipality) were sent out to the selected employees in all the municipalities in the Alfred Nzo District. Out of the questionnaires that were sent out, 103 responses were received. These were analysed to draw findings, conclusion and recommendations. The empirical results of the study revealed that there is strong evidence that leadership, governance and human capital management have a positive influence on the municipality’s AFS audit report outcomes. It also revealed that there is overwhelming evidence that internal controls have a positive influence on the municipality’s AFS audit report outcomes. The study recommends how leadership, governance, internal controls and human capital management must be improved. It also provides future research recommendations to improve this study.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2013
- Authors: Sigcau, Ntsikelelo
- Date: 2013
- Subjects: Local finance -- South Africa -- Auditing , Finance, Public -- South Africa , Local government -- South Africa -- Finance
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MBA
- Identifier: vital:8906 , http://hdl.handle.net/10948/d1021004
- Description: The third sphere of government (Local Government) has been persistently clouded by unfavourable Annual Financial Statement (AFS) audit reports. This results in local government losing credibility and its stakeholders losing confidence in the institutions or municipalities. In-depth analysis of the root cause of this dilemma is an opportunity for the municipality to reorganise its house and redeem its dignity and credibility to its stakeholders through addressing the identified challenges. The importance of the study can be attributed to the need to investigate the root causes of unfavourable audit opinion and recommend possible remedies that can assist municipalities to improve their audit report outcomes which in turn will improve the confidence of its stakeholders. The primary objective of the study was to investigate variables that impact on the audit report outcomes on annual financial statements of the municipalities that are within Alfred Nzo District (AND) Jurisdiction, including Alfred Nzo District Municipality (ANDM). This was achieved through investigating the root causes of the audit report outcomes with specific focus on the relationship that exists between the management role and audit outcomes of the Alfred Nzo District Municipalities. This was measured by the municipality’s leadership, governance, internal controls and human capital management. Convenient sampling was used wherein 150 questionnaires (30 per municipality) were sent out to the selected employees in all the municipalities in the Alfred Nzo District. Out of the questionnaires that were sent out, 103 responses were received. These were analysed to draw findings, conclusion and recommendations. The empirical results of the study revealed that there is strong evidence that leadership, governance and human capital management have a positive influence on the municipality’s AFS audit report outcomes. It also revealed that there is overwhelming evidence that internal controls have a positive influence on the municipality’s AFS audit report outcomes. The study recommends how leadership, governance, internal controls and human capital management must be improved. It also provides future research recommendations to improve this study.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2013
An investigation of the efficacy of the Office of the Auditor-General in ensuring public financial accountability in the Gauteng Province
- Authors: Khumalo, Mildred Tariro
- Date: 2007
- Subjects: Finance, Public -- South Africa , Budget -- South Africa -- Gauteng , Liability (Law)
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MPA
- Identifier: vital:11645 , http://hdl.handle.net/10353/283 , Finance, Public -- South Africa , Budget -- South Africa -- Gauteng , Liability (Law)
- Description: Increasing accountability is a key element in a wide variety of governance reforms, from national level, public sector restructuring, to anti corruption campaigns and to centralise service delivery at local levels. (Van Wyk, 2002:311). Financial accountability has a major effect on performance issues, and these two combined have implications on democratic accountability. It is obviously a fact that when public officials become accountable, this will have a positive effect on service delivery. The introduction of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA) 1999 (Act 1 of 1999) as amended by Act 29 of 1999 adopts an approach to financial management, which emphasises the need for accountability of results by focusing on output and responsibility rather than the rule driven approach of the previous Exchequer Acts. One quickly realises that the PFMA aims to regulate financial management at both National and Provincial levels of government. It directs attention at revenue, expenditure, assets and liabilities and aims to see that these are managed efficiently and effectively. Public finance accountability is increasingly becoming important in the public sector. One means of effecting accountability is through auditing. For this reason the Office of the Auditor -General through the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996 (Act 108 of 1996 section 216 (1)) was established to facilitate effective accountability through auditing. The Office of the Auditor -General’s role is by no means minor, for it plays a major role in curbing corruption and acts as a ‘watchdog’ of the nation over public funds. Amidst high mismanagement and misuse of public resources, as well as corruption, especially in developing countries, the major question one asks is how effective the Auditor -General can be in ensuring effective public financial management and accountability within state departments so as to improve service delivery.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2007
- Authors: Khumalo, Mildred Tariro
- Date: 2007
- Subjects: Finance, Public -- South Africa , Budget -- South Africa -- Gauteng , Liability (Law)
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MPA
- Identifier: vital:11645 , http://hdl.handle.net/10353/283 , Finance, Public -- South Africa , Budget -- South Africa -- Gauteng , Liability (Law)
- Description: Increasing accountability is a key element in a wide variety of governance reforms, from national level, public sector restructuring, to anti corruption campaigns and to centralise service delivery at local levels. (Van Wyk, 2002:311). Financial accountability has a major effect on performance issues, and these two combined have implications on democratic accountability. It is obviously a fact that when public officials become accountable, this will have a positive effect on service delivery. The introduction of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA) 1999 (Act 1 of 1999) as amended by Act 29 of 1999 adopts an approach to financial management, which emphasises the need for accountability of results by focusing on output and responsibility rather than the rule driven approach of the previous Exchequer Acts. One quickly realises that the PFMA aims to regulate financial management at both National and Provincial levels of government. It directs attention at revenue, expenditure, assets and liabilities and aims to see that these are managed efficiently and effectively. Public finance accountability is increasingly becoming important in the public sector. One means of effecting accountability is through auditing. For this reason the Office of the Auditor -General through the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996 (Act 108 of 1996 section 216 (1)) was established to facilitate effective accountability through auditing. The Office of the Auditor -General’s role is by no means minor, for it plays a major role in curbing corruption and acts as a ‘watchdog’ of the nation over public funds. Amidst high mismanagement and misuse of public resources, as well as corruption, especially in developing countries, the major question one asks is how effective the Auditor -General can be in ensuring effective public financial management and accountability within state departments so as to improve service delivery.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2007
The economic valuation of cultural events in developing countries: combining market and non-market valuation techniques at the South African National Arts Festival
- Authors: Snowball, Jeanette Dalziel
- Date: 2006
- Subjects: Standard Bank National Arts Festival -- Economic aspects , Performing arts festivals -- Economic aspects -- South Africa -- Grahamstown , Arts -- South Africa -- Economic aspects , Finance -- South Africa , Arts -- South Africa -- Finance , Arts -- South Africa -- Political aspects , Finance, Public -- South Africa , South Africa -- Politics and government -- 1994-
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: vital:969 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1002703 , Standard Bank National Arts Festival -- Economic aspects , Performing arts festivals -- Economic aspects -- South Africa -- Grahamstown , Arts -- South Africa -- Economic aspects , Finance -- South Africa , Arts -- South Africa -- Finance , Arts -- South Africa -- Political aspects , Finance, Public -- South Africa , South Africa -- Politics and government -- 1994-
- Description: The arts in many countries, but particularly in developing ones, are coming under increasing financial pressure and finding it difficult to justify the increases in government funding needed to maintain and grow the cultural sector. The trend in cultural economics, as well as in other areas, appears to be towards including qualitative valuations, as well as the more traditional quantitative ones. This thesis argues that the value of cultural events should include long term historical qualitative analysis, financial or economic impact and a valuation of the positive externalities provided by cultural events and that any one of these should only be regarded as a partial analysis. Four methods of valuing the arts using the South African National Arts Festival (NAF) as an example are demonstrated. Firstly, a qualitative historical analysis of the role of the NAF in South Africa’s transformation process from Apartheid to the democratic New South Africa is examined, using theories of cultural capital as a theoretical basis. It is argued that the value of cultural events needs to take into account long-term influences especially in countries undergoing political and social transformation. The second valuation method applied is the traditional economic impact study. Four economic impact studies conducted on the NAF are discussed and methodologies compared. It is concluded that, despite the skepticism of many cultural economists, the method can provide a useful partial valuation and may also be used for effective lobbying for government support of the arts. Chapter four discusses willingness to pay studies conducted at the NAF in 2000 and 2003 (as well as a pilot study conducted at the Klein Karoo Nationale Kunstefees). It is found that lower income and education groups do benefit from the positive externalities provided by the Festival and that this is reflected in their willingness to pay to support it. It is also argued that such contingent valuation studies can provide a reasonably reliable valuation of Festival externalities, but that they may be partly capturing current or future expected financial gains as well. Finally, the relatively new choice experiment methodology (also called conjoint analysis) is demonstrated on visitors to the NAF. The great advantage of this method in valuing cultural events is that it provides part-worths of various Festival attributes for different demographic groups. This enables organizes to structure the programme in such a way as to attract previously excluded groups and to conduct a cost-benefit analysis for each part of the Festival.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2006
- Authors: Snowball, Jeanette Dalziel
- Date: 2006
- Subjects: Standard Bank National Arts Festival -- Economic aspects , Performing arts festivals -- Economic aspects -- South Africa -- Grahamstown , Arts -- South Africa -- Economic aspects , Finance -- South Africa , Arts -- South Africa -- Finance , Arts -- South Africa -- Political aspects , Finance, Public -- South Africa , South Africa -- Politics and government -- 1994-
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: vital:969 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1002703 , Standard Bank National Arts Festival -- Economic aspects , Performing arts festivals -- Economic aspects -- South Africa -- Grahamstown , Arts -- South Africa -- Economic aspects , Finance -- South Africa , Arts -- South Africa -- Finance , Arts -- South Africa -- Political aspects , Finance, Public -- South Africa , South Africa -- Politics and government -- 1994-
- Description: The arts in many countries, but particularly in developing ones, are coming under increasing financial pressure and finding it difficult to justify the increases in government funding needed to maintain and grow the cultural sector. The trend in cultural economics, as well as in other areas, appears to be towards including qualitative valuations, as well as the more traditional quantitative ones. This thesis argues that the value of cultural events should include long term historical qualitative analysis, financial or economic impact and a valuation of the positive externalities provided by cultural events and that any one of these should only be regarded as a partial analysis. Four methods of valuing the arts using the South African National Arts Festival (NAF) as an example are demonstrated. Firstly, a qualitative historical analysis of the role of the NAF in South Africa’s transformation process from Apartheid to the democratic New South Africa is examined, using theories of cultural capital as a theoretical basis. It is argued that the value of cultural events needs to take into account long-term influences especially in countries undergoing political and social transformation. The second valuation method applied is the traditional economic impact study. Four economic impact studies conducted on the NAF are discussed and methodologies compared. It is concluded that, despite the skepticism of many cultural economists, the method can provide a useful partial valuation and may also be used for effective lobbying for government support of the arts. Chapter four discusses willingness to pay studies conducted at the NAF in 2000 and 2003 (as well as a pilot study conducted at the Klein Karoo Nationale Kunstefees). It is found that lower income and education groups do benefit from the positive externalities provided by the Festival and that this is reflected in their willingness to pay to support it. It is also argued that such contingent valuation studies can provide a reasonably reliable valuation of Festival externalities, but that they may be partly capturing current or future expected financial gains as well. Finally, the relatively new choice experiment methodology (also called conjoint analysis) is demonstrated on visitors to the NAF. The great advantage of this method in valuing cultural events is that it provides part-worths of various Festival attributes for different demographic groups. This enables organizes to structure the programme in such a way as to attract previously excluded groups and to conduct a cost-benefit analysis for each part of the Festival.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2006
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »