Geochemical exploration in calcrete terrains
- Authors: Krug, Mark Alan
- Date: 1995 , 2013-10-02
- Subjects: Duricrusts , Silcrete , Geochemical prospecting
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: vital:5026 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1006891 , Duricrusts , Silcrete , Geochemical prospecting
- Description: This work takes a look at some of the literature on calcretes and especially the problem of geochemical exploration in calcrete terrains. The conclusion that will be reached is that exploration in calcrete terrains is not futile and that provided the explorationist is aware of the types of calcrete and their genetic implications calcrete can be used as a sampling medium and anomalies can be detected through calcrete (p.1.) , KMBT_363 , Adobe Acrobat 9.54 Paper Capture Plug-in
- Full Text:
Geochemical exploration in arid and semi-arid environments
- Authors: Van Berkel, Ferdinand
- Date: 1983 , 2013-04-02
- Subjects: Geochemical prospecting , Arid regions
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: vital:4920 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1004389 , Geochemical prospecting , Arid regions
- Description: Anomalous element distributions within the regolith result from chemical adjustments of the earth's surface to prevailing climatic conditions. Because of the lack of moisture in the arid environment, chemical equilibrium related to paleoclimates is largely maintained. Mechanical or clastic dispersion dominates arid weathering and hence the exploration approach is largely dictated by the degree of preservation of the paleoregolith. Arid environment geochemists thus have to contend with surface materials ranging from laterite and calcrete in areas where the imprint of aridity is minimal, to more conventional sample media such as bedrock, stream sediment and lithic soils in actively dissecting areas. Extraction techniques are designed specifically to isolate clastic dispersion trains. Thick mantles of aeolian and water-borne overburden characterise desert lowlands and are a challenge to the exploration geochemist. Techniques showing the most promise in these areas include groundwater geochemistry, vapour geochemistry, surface microlayer geochemistry, geobotany and biogeochemistry which attempt to isolate gaseous and weak hydromorphic, ore-related trace-element dispersions. Termite mound sampling yields convincing results and appears to be an under-utilised geochemical approach. , KMBT_363 , Adobe Acrobat 9.53 Paper Capture Plug-in
- Full Text:
The factors affecting the interpretation of geochemical surveys in mineral exploration
- Authors: Fletcher, B A
- Date: 1982
- Subjects: Geochemistry , Geochemistry -- Environmental aspects , Mining geology , Minerals , Ore deposits , Geochemical prospecting
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: vital:5014 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1006142
- Description: [From introduction] Exploration geochemistry is an indirect method of detecting mineral deposits by measuring the abundance and distribution of ore elements and elements closely associated with ore in natural materials at or near the earth's surface. The method relies on the assumption that a mineral deposit is reflected by unusual element abundances or distribution patterns (geochemical halos), and that these indications of mineralization can be detected by geochemical surveys involving the collection and analysis of natural materials. The interpretation of geochemical surveys in mineral exploration involves: 1) The use of geological and statistical inference, based on a knowledge of the normal behaviour and distribution of indicator elements in the exploration area, to recognize apparent geochemical anomalies in field and analytical data and to predict the type of geochemical halo reflected by the anomalies. 11) The use of geological inference, based on a knowledge of the characteristics of geochemical halos and their relationship to mineral deposits, to predict the presence and probable location of an ore body. The interpretation process is, however, complicated by the absence of a simple universal formula that relates the abundance and distribution of elements in natural materials to the presence or absence of a mineral deposit. The interpretation of a geochemical survey must, thus, be based on an empirical approach which avaluates each survey as an individual problem. The objective of this dissertation is to illustrate the factors affecting the "nuts and bolts" approach to the interpretation of geochemical surveys in mineral exploration. The discussion is aimed at providing field geologists responsible -for the planning and execution of geochemical surveys with some basic guidelines for interpreting the surveys. I hope that the contents of this dissertation will help field geologists to "look in the last place first".
- Full Text: