- Title
- Investigations into biological control options for Lycium ferocissimum Miers, African Boxthorn (Solanaceae) for Australia
- Creator
- Mauda, Evans Vusani
- ThesisAdvisor
- Martin, Grant D
- ThesisAdvisor
- Hill, M P
- Subject
- Lycium ferocissimum
- Subject
- Solanaceae -- Biological control -- Australia
- Subject
- Weeds -- Control -- Australia
- Subject
- Invasive plants -- Biological control -- Australia
- Subject
- Insects as biological pest control agents -- Australia
- Subject
- Insect-plant relationships
- Date
- 2020
- Type
- text
- Type
- Thesis
- Type
- Doctoral
- Type
- PhD
- Identifier
- http://hdl.handle.net/10962/167142
- Identifier
- vital:41441
- Description
- Lycium ferocissimum Miers (Solanaceae) (African boxthorn or boxthorn) is a shrub native to South Africa,and has become naturalised and invasive in Australia and New Zealand. The plant is listed on the Noxious Weed List for Australian States and territories. Although other control methods are available, biological control presents a potentially sustainable intervention for reducing populations of this weed in Australia. In South Africa, the plant has been recorded from two allopatric populations, one in the Eastern Cape Province, the other in the Western Cape Provinces, however, there taxonomic and morphological uncertainties are reported in the literature. Therefore, before native range surveys for potential biological control agents could be considered, the taxonomic uncertainty needed to be resolved. The two geographically distinct areas, as well as the Australia population were sampled to assess morphological and genetic variation. All samples collected in Australia were confirmed as L.ferocissimum, with no evidence of hybridisation with any other Lycium species. Nuclear and chloroplast genetic diversity within L.ferocissimum across South Africa was high, and Australia was low, with no evidence of genetic seperation. One ehaplotypes found across Australia was found at only two sites in South Africa, both in the Western Cape, suggesting that the Australian lineage may have originated from this region. Ten samples from South Africa, putatively identified in the field as L.ferocissimum, were genetically characterised as different (unidentified) Lycium species. The majority of plants sampled were confirmed as L.ferocissimum, sharing a common haplotype (haplotype 5) with sampled specimens from Australia. Morphological analyses across different Lycium species in South Africa did not identify any leaf or floral characteristics unique to L.ferocissimum, and thus morphological identification in the native range remains problematic. Surveys for phytophagous in sects on L.ferocissimum were carried out regularly over a two-year period in the two regions. The number of insect species found in the Eastern Cape Province (55) was higher than in the Western Cape Province (41), but insect diversity based on Shannon indices was highest in the Western Cape Province. Indicator species analysis revealed eight insect herbivore species driving the differences in the herbivore communities between the two provinces. Based on insect distribution, abundance, feeding preference and available literature, three species were prioritised as potential biological control agents. These include the leaf-chewing beetles, Cassida distinguenda Spaeth (Chrysomelidae) and Cleta eckloni Mulsant (Coccinellidae), and the leaf-mining weevil, Neoplatygaster serietuberculata Gyllenhal (Curculionidae). Native range studies such as this are perhaps the most technically difficult and logistically time-consuming part of the biological control programme. Yet, the entire outcome of a programme depends on the suite of potential agents feeding on the weed. The information gained during this stage significantly contributed to the prioritization of agents for further host-range testing and possible release. Here we showed how molecular and genetic characterisations of the target weed can be us ed to accurately define the identity and phylogeny of the target species. In addition, the study also highlighted the importance of considering plant morphology and how phenotypic plasticity may influence infield plant identifications while conducting native range surveys. By gaining further information during long-term and wide spread native range surveys we were not just able to provide a list of herbivorous insect fauna and fungi associated with the plant, but were able to prioritise the phytophagous species that held the most potential as biological control agents.
- Format
- 167 pages, pdf
- Publisher
- Rhodes University, Faculty of Science, Zoology and Entomology
- Language
- English
- Rights
- Mauda, Evans Vusani
- Hits: 2717
- Visitors: 2785
- Downloads: 524
Collections
RU Department of Zoology and Entomology
| Thumbnail | File | Description | Size | Format | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View Details | SOURCE1 | MAUDA-PHD-TR20-420.pdf | 2 MB | Adobe Acrobat PDF | View Details |