Co-management and social equity at Silaka and Hluleka Nature Reserves, South Africa
- Authors: Mtshintsho, Anda
- Date: 2024-10-11
- Subjects: Natural resources Co-management , Social equity , Benefit sharing , Protected areas Public use South Africa Eastern Cape , Indigenous peoples Attitudes
- Language: English
- Type: Academic theses , Master's theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/464834 , vital:76549
- Description: Co-management of protected areas (PAs) is a desired conservation approach aimed at balancing ecological goals and livelihood needs. Central to co-management are issues related to power sharing, responsibilities and benefit sharing. However, there still remains a dominance of an ecological emphasis in PA management, with studies focusing more on ‘objective’ biodiversity indicators for measuring the effectiveness of protected areas. However, focusing only on ecological indicators addresses a narrow perspective of achieving ecological integrity and misses social dimensions that, in some cases, might be considered more important than technical considerations. Particularly, in contexts with a history of socio-physical displacement of Indigenous people and local communities (IPLC), the social dimensions of wellbeing are complexly embedded into the economic and ecological dimensions, such that ignoring these linkages might jeopardise the success of protected areas. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine the state of research and conceptual advances on social indicators of conservation success in co-managed PAs and stakeholder views and perceptions on socially just conservation in co-managed protected areas in Silaka and Hluleka Nature Reserves, South Africa. To achieve this, a scoping review, semi-structured interviews and futures workshops (using the three horizons framework) were conducted. Findings from the scoping review (chapter 2) revealed that much of the reported social monitoring indicators still rely on quantifiable metrics (i.e., economic benefits) and less on subjective and relational metrics (i.e., qualitative strength of social networks and perceptions). Unsurprisingly, many of the reviewed case studies revealed the use of participation as an indicator of evaluating co-management success. Further, the interviews and futures workshop results in chapter 3 showed that the non-accrual of key co-management expectations such as the employment of local people, benefit-sharing (material or otherwise), participation in decision-making and community development has led to heightened conflicts between the reserve management agency and local people. Consequently, the respondents did not value the co-management arrangements, citing unfulfilled promises. Broadly, the findings of this study emphasise the need for collective and collaborative efforts in developing indicators that are not only socially just but those that are context dependent and sensitive. , Thesis (MSc) -- Faculty of Science, Environmental Science, 2024
- Full Text:
- Authors: Mtshintsho, Anda
- Date: 2024-10-11
- Subjects: Natural resources Co-management , Social equity , Benefit sharing , Protected areas Public use South Africa Eastern Cape , Indigenous peoples Attitudes
- Language: English
- Type: Academic theses , Master's theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/464834 , vital:76549
- Description: Co-management of protected areas (PAs) is a desired conservation approach aimed at balancing ecological goals and livelihood needs. Central to co-management are issues related to power sharing, responsibilities and benefit sharing. However, there still remains a dominance of an ecological emphasis in PA management, with studies focusing more on ‘objective’ biodiversity indicators for measuring the effectiveness of protected areas. However, focusing only on ecological indicators addresses a narrow perspective of achieving ecological integrity and misses social dimensions that, in some cases, might be considered more important than technical considerations. Particularly, in contexts with a history of socio-physical displacement of Indigenous people and local communities (IPLC), the social dimensions of wellbeing are complexly embedded into the economic and ecological dimensions, such that ignoring these linkages might jeopardise the success of protected areas. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine the state of research and conceptual advances on social indicators of conservation success in co-managed PAs and stakeholder views and perceptions on socially just conservation in co-managed protected areas in Silaka and Hluleka Nature Reserves, South Africa. To achieve this, a scoping review, semi-structured interviews and futures workshops (using the three horizons framework) were conducted. Findings from the scoping review (chapter 2) revealed that much of the reported social monitoring indicators still rely on quantifiable metrics (i.e., economic benefits) and less on subjective and relational metrics (i.e., qualitative strength of social networks and perceptions). Unsurprisingly, many of the reviewed case studies revealed the use of participation as an indicator of evaluating co-management success. Further, the interviews and futures workshop results in chapter 3 showed that the non-accrual of key co-management expectations such as the employment of local people, benefit-sharing (material or otherwise), participation in decision-making and community development has led to heightened conflicts between the reserve management agency and local people. Consequently, the respondents did not value the co-management arrangements, citing unfulfilled promises. Broadly, the findings of this study emphasise the need for collective and collaborative efforts in developing indicators that are not only socially just but those that are context dependent and sensitive. , Thesis (MSc) -- Faculty of Science, Environmental Science, 2024
- Full Text:
Participatory mapping of key drivers of ecological change and analysing equity dimensions of ecosystem services flow in the Kat River Catchment
- Authors: Seriki, Esther Ahuoiza
- Date: 2024-10-11
- Subjects: Ecological change , Ecosystem services South Africa Kat River Valley , Participatory GIS , Freshwater ecosystem , Social equity
- Language: English
- Type: Academic theses , Master's theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/465024 , vital:76566
- Description: Rivers are important ecosystems which supply ecosystem services critical to social-economic well-being. However, many rivers are degraded due to human activities. Degradation of river systems compromises the quality and quantity of ecosystem services they can supply. Managing important drivers of ecological change requires broad-based stakeholder participation to mobilise collective actions for an effective rehabilitation strategy. This study looked at two crucial research objectives in the Kat River catchment. The first was to undertake a multidimensional, participatory, engaged mapping of ecological changes, as well as current and changing ecosystem services in the Kat River catchment, and the second was to analyse the equity dimensions of ecosystem services flow in the Kat River catchment. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and participatory GIS mapping exercises. A purposive sampling method was applied to recruit research participants for interviews and workshops. Between March 13th and May 31st, 2023, thirty-one (31) participants representing four social groups, non-farming individuals, catchment management forum members, commercial and subsistence farmers, participated in interviews. Additionally, twenty-two (22) stakeholders attended 2-day workshops held between 20−21 April 2022, and 30−31 May 2023. Data collected from interviews and workshops were analysed using thematic analysis. The results of stakeholder perceptions regarding the perceived ecological changes and their key drivers in the Kat River catchment revealed a concerning trend. Participants reported significant changes to the catchment area over time, including increased occurrences of flooding and water pollution and decreased aquatic biodiversity. Furthermore, degradation of ecosystem services, such as water quality, availability of medicinal plants, reeds, and fish populations, was noted. These environmental shifts have been accompanied by a rise in social-economic burdens, including the prevalence of water-borne diseases, cultural burdens (particularly the inability of certain groups to access ancestral grave sites) and declining fish populations. These findings emphasise the urgent need for intervention strategies to mitigate further degradation of the catchment area and safeguard the well-being of both the human population and the integrity of the ecosystems. Recommended intervention measures include improving wastewater management practices and creating targeted public awareness campaigns. By addressing these challenges, stakeholders can work towards preserving the integrity of the catchment area, protecting water resources and conserving biodiversity for future generations. The equity dimensions (distributive and procedural equity) analysis revealed notable disparities in access to the benefits of ecosystem services, as well as in participation of residents in the Kat River Water Users Association. Certain social groups, such as commercial farmers, were observed to receive more benefits from ecosystem services, while other groups, including the elderly and disabled individuals, seem to be negatively impacted by the activities of those who benefit most from ecosystem services in the Kat River catchment. This raises not only an equity issue but also the issue of how costs are externalised by certain groups. Of particular concern was the finding that seventy (70) per cent of the research participants were not aware of the presence of the Kat River Water Users Association, raising concerns about procedural equity in water resource management processes. Additionally, ninety (90) per cent of the participants had the perception that there was unfair water access and allocation across the various social groups, highlighting possible distributive inequities. The participants expressed a clear interest in learning more about the existence and operation of the Kat River Water Users Association, signalling a need for increased awareness and participation among social groups. Addressing these equity concerns is crucial to ensure that water resource management processes are designed to provide all stakeholders and water-dependent actors with equitable and fair access to decision making. Moving forward, efforts should be directed towards raising awareness of the Kat River Water Users Association and to promoting inclusive participation among all social groups. This awareness may involve targeted outreach campaigns, community engagement initiatives and policy reforms to foster more equitable water governance practices within the catchment. , Thesis (MSc) -- Faculty of Science, Institute for Water Research, 2024
- Full Text:
- Authors: Seriki, Esther Ahuoiza
- Date: 2024-10-11
- Subjects: Ecological change , Ecosystem services South Africa Kat River Valley , Participatory GIS , Freshwater ecosystem , Social equity
- Language: English
- Type: Academic theses , Master's theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/465024 , vital:76566
- Description: Rivers are important ecosystems which supply ecosystem services critical to social-economic well-being. However, many rivers are degraded due to human activities. Degradation of river systems compromises the quality and quantity of ecosystem services they can supply. Managing important drivers of ecological change requires broad-based stakeholder participation to mobilise collective actions for an effective rehabilitation strategy. This study looked at two crucial research objectives in the Kat River catchment. The first was to undertake a multidimensional, participatory, engaged mapping of ecological changes, as well as current and changing ecosystem services in the Kat River catchment, and the second was to analyse the equity dimensions of ecosystem services flow in the Kat River catchment. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and participatory GIS mapping exercises. A purposive sampling method was applied to recruit research participants for interviews and workshops. Between March 13th and May 31st, 2023, thirty-one (31) participants representing four social groups, non-farming individuals, catchment management forum members, commercial and subsistence farmers, participated in interviews. Additionally, twenty-two (22) stakeholders attended 2-day workshops held between 20−21 April 2022, and 30−31 May 2023. Data collected from interviews and workshops were analysed using thematic analysis. The results of stakeholder perceptions regarding the perceived ecological changes and their key drivers in the Kat River catchment revealed a concerning trend. Participants reported significant changes to the catchment area over time, including increased occurrences of flooding and water pollution and decreased aquatic biodiversity. Furthermore, degradation of ecosystem services, such as water quality, availability of medicinal plants, reeds, and fish populations, was noted. These environmental shifts have been accompanied by a rise in social-economic burdens, including the prevalence of water-borne diseases, cultural burdens (particularly the inability of certain groups to access ancestral grave sites) and declining fish populations. These findings emphasise the urgent need for intervention strategies to mitigate further degradation of the catchment area and safeguard the well-being of both the human population and the integrity of the ecosystems. Recommended intervention measures include improving wastewater management practices and creating targeted public awareness campaigns. By addressing these challenges, stakeholders can work towards preserving the integrity of the catchment area, protecting water resources and conserving biodiversity for future generations. The equity dimensions (distributive and procedural equity) analysis revealed notable disparities in access to the benefits of ecosystem services, as well as in participation of residents in the Kat River Water Users Association. Certain social groups, such as commercial farmers, were observed to receive more benefits from ecosystem services, while other groups, including the elderly and disabled individuals, seem to be negatively impacted by the activities of those who benefit most from ecosystem services in the Kat River catchment. This raises not only an equity issue but also the issue of how costs are externalised by certain groups. Of particular concern was the finding that seventy (70) per cent of the research participants were not aware of the presence of the Kat River Water Users Association, raising concerns about procedural equity in water resource management processes. Additionally, ninety (90) per cent of the participants had the perception that there was unfair water access and allocation across the various social groups, highlighting possible distributive inequities. The participants expressed a clear interest in learning more about the existence and operation of the Kat River Water Users Association, signalling a need for increased awareness and participation among social groups. Addressing these equity concerns is crucial to ensure that water resource management processes are designed to provide all stakeholders and water-dependent actors with equitable and fair access to decision making. Moving forward, efforts should be directed towards raising awareness of the Kat River Water Users Association and to promoting inclusive participation among all social groups. This awareness may involve targeted outreach campaigns, community engagement initiatives and policy reforms to foster more equitable water governance practices within the catchment. , Thesis (MSc) -- Faculty of Science, Institute for Water Research, 2024
- Full Text:
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »