The synthesis and assessment of thioxanthone- and xanthone- derived compounds as hosts for application in host-guest chemistry
- Authors: Greyling, Lizé
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Chemistry, Organic , Biochemistry
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , DPhil
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/42525 , vital:36665
- Description: In this work, the host capabilities of two structurally related compounds, N,N’-bis(9-phenyl-9- thioxanthenyl)ethylenediamine (H1) and N,N’-bis(9-phenyl-9-xanthenyl)ethylenediamine (H2) were compared in the presence of a wide variety of guest species. Additionally, the selectivity displayed by these host compounds were examined when exposed to mixtures of guests in order to ascertain whether it would be feasible to employ them in alternative separation strategies for the purification of industrially relevant chemicals. H1 and H2 were synthesized by reacting thioxanthone and xanthone with phenylmagnesium bromide. The resultant alcohol was then treated with perchloric acid and, finally, two of these molecules were effectively linked by utilizing ethylenediamine to afford the two host compounds. Initially, H1 and H2 were investigated for their inclusion abilities by recrystallizing each from a number of potential isomeric and non-isomeric guest compounds such as the xylenes and ethylbenzene, methylanisoles and anisole, methylpyridines and pyridine, methylcyclohexanones and cyclohexanone, heterocyclic five- and six- membered ring compounds, alkylsubstituted benzenes, anilines, and dihaloalkanes. H1 displayed excellent inclusion ability when presented with the above-mentioned compounds, and a 1:1 H:G ratio was consistently preferred in each case. H2 also proved to be successful in this regard but did not include the methylcyclohexanones and cyclohexanone nor the heterocyclic five-membered ring solvents. Furthermore, varying host:guest ratios were observed for the complexes formed with H2. Mixed competition experiments were carried out in the presence of either isomeric or related but non-isomeric guest species. When H1 and H2 were independently recrystallized from mixtures of the former, selectivity orders correlated for both hosts, but it was observed that H2 exhibited an enhanced selectivity for the preferred guests in each case, compared with H1. Interestingly, in mixtures of the latter, host behaviours were distinctly opposing (with the exception of the dihaloalkanes). H1, and even more so H2, demonstrated very high selectivities for p-xylene, aniline and N,Ndimethylaniline from the xylene and aniline guest series, respectively, where selectivities were found to be ~90% or higher for host recrystallization experiments from respective mixtures of these guests. Single crystal X-ray diffraction, Hirshfeld surface and thermal analyses were employed in order to elucidate the reasons for any selectivity observations. The inclusion of these guests was, in most cases, found to be as a result of interactions between host and guest species, which included π∙∙∙π stacking, C‒H∙∙∙π, hydrogen bonding and various other short contact types. Guest compounds were accommodated in either cavities or channels and this was dependent on the nature of the guest. The host molecule conformations showed H1 to adopt a bent tricyclic fused ring system with the N atoms of the linker in a synclinal arrangement, while in complexes with H2, the fused ring system was near-planar and the N atoms adopted an antiperiplanar geometry. These key differences resulted in a very ordered host‒host packing for H2 as a direct result of the more planar O-containing ring and linear linker; for H1, on the other hand, the buckled S-containing ring and gauche-orientated N atoms resulted in a less ordered packing, which ultimately related to the differences in the behaviour of the two host species. Hirshfeld surface analyses, in general, did not provide much information to explain the host selectivities, with the exception of complexes containing the five-membered ring guest heterocyclics. Thermal analyses were completed on all suitable host-guest complexes and, in most cases but not all, the onset and peak temperatures (terms Ton and Tp, respectively) were related to the thermal stability of the complexes, which were used to rationalize the selectivities of these host compounds.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
- Authors: Greyling, Lizé
- Date: 2019
- Subjects: Chemistry, Organic , Biochemistry
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , DPhil
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/42525 , vital:36665
- Description: In this work, the host capabilities of two structurally related compounds, N,N’-bis(9-phenyl-9- thioxanthenyl)ethylenediamine (H1) and N,N’-bis(9-phenyl-9-xanthenyl)ethylenediamine (H2) were compared in the presence of a wide variety of guest species. Additionally, the selectivity displayed by these host compounds were examined when exposed to mixtures of guests in order to ascertain whether it would be feasible to employ them in alternative separation strategies for the purification of industrially relevant chemicals. H1 and H2 were synthesized by reacting thioxanthone and xanthone with phenylmagnesium bromide. The resultant alcohol was then treated with perchloric acid and, finally, two of these molecules were effectively linked by utilizing ethylenediamine to afford the two host compounds. Initially, H1 and H2 were investigated for their inclusion abilities by recrystallizing each from a number of potential isomeric and non-isomeric guest compounds such as the xylenes and ethylbenzene, methylanisoles and anisole, methylpyridines and pyridine, methylcyclohexanones and cyclohexanone, heterocyclic five- and six- membered ring compounds, alkylsubstituted benzenes, anilines, and dihaloalkanes. H1 displayed excellent inclusion ability when presented with the above-mentioned compounds, and a 1:1 H:G ratio was consistently preferred in each case. H2 also proved to be successful in this regard but did not include the methylcyclohexanones and cyclohexanone nor the heterocyclic five-membered ring solvents. Furthermore, varying host:guest ratios were observed for the complexes formed with H2. Mixed competition experiments were carried out in the presence of either isomeric or related but non-isomeric guest species. When H1 and H2 were independently recrystallized from mixtures of the former, selectivity orders correlated for both hosts, but it was observed that H2 exhibited an enhanced selectivity for the preferred guests in each case, compared with H1. Interestingly, in mixtures of the latter, host behaviours were distinctly opposing (with the exception of the dihaloalkanes). H1, and even more so H2, demonstrated very high selectivities for p-xylene, aniline and N,Ndimethylaniline from the xylene and aniline guest series, respectively, where selectivities were found to be ~90% or higher for host recrystallization experiments from respective mixtures of these guests. Single crystal X-ray diffraction, Hirshfeld surface and thermal analyses were employed in order to elucidate the reasons for any selectivity observations. The inclusion of these guests was, in most cases, found to be as a result of interactions between host and guest species, which included π∙∙∙π stacking, C‒H∙∙∙π, hydrogen bonding and various other short contact types. Guest compounds were accommodated in either cavities or channels and this was dependent on the nature of the guest. The host molecule conformations showed H1 to adopt a bent tricyclic fused ring system with the N atoms of the linker in a synclinal arrangement, while in complexes with H2, the fused ring system was near-planar and the N atoms adopted an antiperiplanar geometry. These key differences resulted in a very ordered host‒host packing for H2 as a direct result of the more planar O-containing ring and linear linker; for H1, on the other hand, the buckled S-containing ring and gauche-orientated N atoms resulted in a less ordered packing, which ultimately related to the differences in the behaviour of the two host species. Hirshfeld surface analyses, in general, did not provide much information to explain the host selectivities, with the exception of complexes containing the five-membered ring guest heterocyclics. Thermal analyses were completed on all suitable host-guest complexes and, in most cases but not all, the onset and peak temperatures (terms Ton and Tp, respectively) were related to the thermal stability of the complexes, which were used to rationalize the selectivities of these host compounds.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2019
Investigation of the potential separation of isomers and related compounds using host compound (2R,3R)-(−)-2,3-dimethoxy-1,1,4,4-tetraphenylbutane-1,4-diol
- Authors: Pohl, Pieter Lourens
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Chemistry, Organic , Clathrate compounds Thermal analysis
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , DPhil
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/23131 , vital:30432
- Description: In this study, we investigated the potential of a host compound, (2R,3R)-(−)-2,3-dimethoxy-1,1,4,4-tetraphenylbutane-1,4-diol (DMT), for use in the separation of isomers and related compounds using host-guest chemistry. The title molecule, DMT, is composed of a butane chain bearing hydroxyl moieties on the terminal carbons and methoxy moieties on the two internal, chiral carbon atoms. In addition, there are two phenyl rings on each of the terminal carbons. The synthesis of DMT was carried out by subjecting the diester of naturally-occurring optically active tartaric acid to a Grignard reaction employing phenylmagnesium bromide. Subsequent methylation of the secondary hydroxy groups with dimethyl sulfate afforded DMT. The resulting host molecule was investigated for its inclusion abilities by crystallizing with a number of potential aromatic, aliphatic and alicyclic guests such as toluene, aniline, nitrobenzene, anisole, cyclohexane, ethyl acetate and ethanol. Host:guest ratios were determined by means of 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Of the hosts investigated, DMT favoured a host:guest ratio of 2:1 for all included guests investigated. It complexed with most non-polycyclic aromatic guests as well as cyclohexane, cyclohexene and cyclohexanone. It was not able to include short chain or branched alcohols such as methanol, ethanol or 2-propanol, or other hetero-aliphatic or hetero- cyclic compounds such as diethyl ether, acetonitrile, morpholine or dioxane. Competition inclusion experiments were performed in which DMT was crystallized from equimolar and non-equimolar binary, ternary and quaternary mixtures of appropriate guests. The mother liquor mixtures and resultant crystals were subjected to GC-MS analysis in order to determine whether DMT showed discriminatory behaviour towards the guests from a mixture. It was observed that DMT was able to differentiate between related compounds, for example, the host preferred to include N,N-dimethylaniline compared with N-methylaniline and aniline. The host also discriminated against isomers, for example, p-xylene was preferentially included over o-xylene and m-xylene, while o-cresol was included in preference to p-cresol and m-cresol. Single crystal X-ray analysis was used to investigate the host–guest interactions responsible for guest inclusion, as well as to discern reasons for the host’s selective behaviour. X-ray data for the inclusion complexes indicated that each complex was isostructural, crystallizing in the monoclinic C2 crystal system. A pair of 1,3- and 2,4- intramolecular hydrogen bonds, as well as intramolecular non-classic hydrogen bonds between adjacent ortho-aromatic hydrogens and hydroxy moieties was a significant stabilizing factor for the geometry of the host. Guests were held within discrete cavities in the crystal lattice, and experienced only π–π stacking, CH–π interactions and other short contacts. Thermal analyses were used to determine the relative thermal stabilities of the complexes, and these data compared to the selectivity preference of DMT, obtained from the competition experiments, in order to assess the reasons for any discriminatory behaviour. Finally, Hirshfeld surface analysis data was used to determine if the thermal stability of the complexes was related to the number and type of interactions between host and guest.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Pohl, Pieter Lourens
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Chemistry, Organic , Clathrate compounds Thermal analysis
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , DPhil
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/23131 , vital:30432
- Description: In this study, we investigated the potential of a host compound, (2R,3R)-(−)-2,3-dimethoxy-1,1,4,4-tetraphenylbutane-1,4-diol (DMT), for use in the separation of isomers and related compounds using host-guest chemistry. The title molecule, DMT, is composed of a butane chain bearing hydroxyl moieties on the terminal carbons and methoxy moieties on the two internal, chiral carbon atoms. In addition, there are two phenyl rings on each of the terminal carbons. The synthesis of DMT was carried out by subjecting the diester of naturally-occurring optically active tartaric acid to a Grignard reaction employing phenylmagnesium bromide. Subsequent methylation of the secondary hydroxy groups with dimethyl sulfate afforded DMT. The resulting host molecule was investigated for its inclusion abilities by crystallizing with a number of potential aromatic, aliphatic and alicyclic guests such as toluene, aniline, nitrobenzene, anisole, cyclohexane, ethyl acetate and ethanol. Host:guest ratios were determined by means of 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Of the hosts investigated, DMT favoured a host:guest ratio of 2:1 for all included guests investigated. It complexed with most non-polycyclic aromatic guests as well as cyclohexane, cyclohexene and cyclohexanone. It was not able to include short chain or branched alcohols such as methanol, ethanol or 2-propanol, or other hetero-aliphatic or hetero- cyclic compounds such as diethyl ether, acetonitrile, morpholine or dioxane. Competition inclusion experiments were performed in which DMT was crystallized from equimolar and non-equimolar binary, ternary and quaternary mixtures of appropriate guests. The mother liquor mixtures and resultant crystals were subjected to GC-MS analysis in order to determine whether DMT showed discriminatory behaviour towards the guests from a mixture. It was observed that DMT was able to differentiate between related compounds, for example, the host preferred to include N,N-dimethylaniline compared with N-methylaniline and aniline. The host also discriminated against isomers, for example, p-xylene was preferentially included over o-xylene and m-xylene, while o-cresol was included in preference to p-cresol and m-cresol. Single crystal X-ray analysis was used to investigate the host–guest interactions responsible for guest inclusion, as well as to discern reasons for the host’s selective behaviour. X-ray data for the inclusion complexes indicated that each complex was isostructural, crystallizing in the monoclinic C2 crystal system. A pair of 1,3- and 2,4- intramolecular hydrogen bonds, as well as intramolecular non-classic hydrogen bonds between adjacent ortho-aromatic hydrogens and hydroxy moieties was a significant stabilizing factor for the geometry of the host. Guests were held within discrete cavities in the crystal lattice, and experienced only π–π stacking, CH–π interactions and other short contacts. Thermal analyses were used to determine the relative thermal stabilities of the complexes, and these data compared to the selectivity preference of DMT, obtained from the competition experiments, in order to assess the reasons for any discriminatory behaviour. Finally, Hirshfeld surface analysis data was used to determine if the thermal stability of the complexes was related to the number and type of interactions between host and guest.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »