The effects of a gradual shift rotation and a split shift nap intervention on cognitive, physiological and subjective responses under simulated night shift settings
- Authors: Davy, Jonathan Patrick
- Date: 2016
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/517 , vital:19966
- Description: Introduction: Shift work, particularly work that occurs at night has been associated with numerous challenges to occupational safety and productivity. This stems from the associated extended wakefulness, circadian disruptions and sleep loss from the inversion of the sleep wake cycle, which predisposes shift workers to reduced alertness, increased fatigue and decrements in performance capacity. These effects may be exacerbated over consecutive night shifts as a result of reductions in sleep length associated with attempting to sleep against the alerting signals of the circadian rhythm during the day. Although a variety of shift work countermeasures exist, new and innovative fatigue management strategies are needed to mitigate the effects of night work. This study proposed two night shift interventions; the Rolling rotation and a split shift nap combination. Aims: The aim of this study was to explore the effects of these interventions to a conventional Fixed night shift arrangement. Selected performance, physiological and subjective measures were applied to track any effects during a five-day shift work study. Methods: The study was laboratory-based and performance was quantified through the application of computer-based perceptual, cognitive and motor tests. Student participants (24 females and 21 males) partook in the study, which adopted a nonrepeated measures design and spanned five consecutive days. During this time, participants were required to perform a simple beading task over five 8-hour shifts. Participants were split according to sex and chronotype between four independent conditions; 1. Fixed night condition required participants to complete one afternoon shift (14h00 – 22h00) and four consecutive night shifts (22h00 - 06h00) 2. Rolling rotation condition gradually “rolled” participants into the night shift by delaying the start and end of an afternoon shift by two hours each day (16h00 – 00h00, 18h00 – 02h00, 20h00 – 04h00, 22h00 – 06h00) until the times matched that of the Fixed night condition. 3. The split shift nap system was made up of two independent groups, both of which completed one afternoon (14h00 to 22h00) and four night shifts. The Nap early condition worked from 20h00 to 08h00, napping between 00h00 and 04h00, while the Nap late condition worked from 00h00 to 12h00 and napped between 04h00 and 08h00 during the night shifts. Napping, the opportunity for which was 200 minutes occurred in the laboratory, but post shift recovery sleep, for all conditions, happened outside the laboratory. During each shift, six test batteries were completed, in which the following measures were taken: 1. Performance: beading output, eye accommodation time, choice reaction time, visual vigilance, simple reaction time, processing speed and object recognition, working memory, motor response time and tracking performance. 2. Physiological: heart rate, heart rate variability (r-MSSD, normalised Low frequency power: LFnu). 3. Self-reported measures: subjective sleepiness and reported sleep length and quality while outside the laboratory. Results: Analyses revealed that: 1. Measures of beading performance, simple reaction time, vigilance and object recognition, working memory, motor response time and control, all physiological measures, except LFnu and subjective sleepiness demonstrated the effects of time of day / fatigue, irrespective of condition. 2. There was no evidence of cumulative fatigue over the four night shifts in the performance and subjective measures and most of the physiological indicators. Beading output decreased significantly over the course of the night shifts, while reported post shift sleep length was significantly reduced with the start of the night shifts, irrespective of condition. 3. The majority of the physiological and performance measures did not differ significantly between conditions. However, there were some effects: the Rolling rotation condition produced the highest beading output compared to the Nap late condition; working memory was significantly lower in the Nap late condition compared to the other conditions. Furthermore, the nap opportunity in both the Nap early and Nap late conditions reduced subjective sleepiness, while napping during the night shift reduced post shift sleep length compared to the Rolling rotation and Fixed night conditions. There was also evidence of sleep inertia following pre-post nap test comparisons, which mainly affected visual perception tasks in both nap conditions. Sleep inertia possibly also accounted for an apparent dissociation between subjective and performance measures. Conclusions: Quantifying and interpreting the effects of night shift work in a laboratory setting has limitations. These stem mainly from the limited ecological validity of the performance outcome measures adopted and the characteristics of the sample that is tested. However, in order to fully understand the efficacy of any shift work countermeasure, the laboratory setting offers a safe, controlled environment in which to do so. The conclusions should thus be considered in light of these limitations. Night shift work negatively affected all elements of human information processing. The combination of reduced physiological arousal, extended wakefulness, increased perceptions of sleepiness and reduced total sleep obtained explained these decrements in performance. While cumulative fatigue has been reported as a challenge associated with night shift work, there was no conclusive evidence of this in the current study. In the case of the Rolling rotation, the gradual introduction to the night shift delayed the inevitable reduction in alertness and performance, which limits the viability of this intervention. The inclusion of the nap interventions was associated with reduced perceptions of sleepiness, which did not translate into improved performance, relative to the Rolling rotation and Fixed night conditions. Apart from considerations of how to manage sleep inertia post nap, the split shift nap intervention can provide an alternative to conventional night shift work arrangements.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016
- Authors: Davy, Jonathan Patrick
- Date: 2016
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Doctoral , PhD
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/517 , vital:19966
- Description: Introduction: Shift work, particularly work that occurs at night has been associated with numerous challenges to occupational safety and productivity. This stems from the associated extended wakefulness, circadian disruptions and sleep loss from the inversion of the sleep wake cycle, which predisposes shift workers to reduced alertness, increased fatigue and decrements in performance capacity. These effects may be exacerbated over consecutive night shifts as a result of reductions in sleep length associated with attempting to sleep against the alerting signals of the circadian rhythm during the day. Although a variety of shift work countermeasures exist, new and innovative fatigue management strategies are needed to mitigate the effects of night work. This study proposed two night shift interventions; the Rolling rotation and a split shift nap combination. Aims: The aim of this study was to explore the effects of these interventions to a conventional Fixed night shift arrangement. Selected performance, physiological and subjective measures were applied to track any effects during a five-day shift work study. Methods: The study was laboratory-based and performance was quantified through the application of computer-based perceptual, cognitive and motor tests. Student participants (24 females and 21 males) partook in the study, which adopted a nonrepeated measures design and spanned five consecutive days. During this time, participants were required to perform a simple beading task over five 8-hour shifts. Participants were split according to sex and chronotype between four independent conditions; 1. Fixed night condition required participants to complete one afternoon shift (14h00 – 22h00) and four consecutive night shifts (22h00 - 06h00) 2. Rolling rotation condition gradually “rolled” participants into the night shift by delaying the start and end of an afternoon shift by two hours each day (16h00 – 00h00, 18h00 – 02h00, 20h00 – 04h00, 22h00 – 06h00) until the times matched that of the Fixed night condition. 3. The split shift nap system was made up of two independent groups, both of which completed one afternoon (14h00 to 22h00) and four night shifts. The Nap early condition worked from 20h00 to 08h00, napping between 00h00 and 04h00, while the Nap late condition worked from 00h00 to 12h00 and napped between 04h00 and 08h00 during the night shifts. Napping, the opportunity for which was 200 minutes occurred in the laboratory, but post shift recovery sleep, for all conditions, happened outside the laboratory. During each shift, six test batteries were completed, in which the following measures were taken: 1. Performance: beading output, eye accommodation time, choice reaction time, visual vigilance, simple reaction time, processing speed and object recognition, working memory, motor response time and tracking performance. 2. Physiological: heart rate, heart rate variability (r-MSSD, normalised Low frequency power: LFnu). 3. Self-reported measures: subjective sleepiness and reported sleep length and quality while outside the laboratory. Results: Analyses revealed that: 1. Measures of beading performance, simple reaction time, vigilance and object recognition, working memory, motor response time and control, all physiological measures, except LFnu and subjective sleepiness demonstrated the effects of time of day / fatigue, irrespective of condition. 2. There was no evidence of cumulative fatigue over the four night shifts in the performance and subjective measures and most of the physiological indicators. Beading output decreased significantly over the course of the night shifts, while reported post shift sleep length was significantly reduced with the start of the night shifts, irrespective of condition. 3. The majority of the physiological and performance measures did not differ significantly between conditions. However, there were some effects: the Rolling rotation condition produced the highest beading output compared to the Nap late condition; working memory was significantly lower in the Nap late condition compared to the other conditions. Furthermore, the nap opportunity in both the Nap early and Nap late conditions reduced subjective sleepiness, while napping during the night shift reduced post shift sleep length compared to the Rolling rotation and Fixed night conditions. There was also evidence of sleep inertia following pre-post nap test comparisons, which mainly affected visual perception tasks in both nap conditions. Sleep inertia possibly also accounted for an apparent dissociation between subjective and performance measures. Conclusions: Quantifying and interpreting the effects of night shift work in a laboratory setting has limitations. These stem mainly from the limited ecological validity of the performance outcome measures adopted and the characteristics of the sample that is tested. However, in order to fully understand the efficacy of any shift work countermeasure, the laboratory setting offers a safe, controlled environment in which to do so. The conclusions should thus be considered in light of these limitations. Night shift work negatively affected all elements of human information processing. The combination of reduced physiological arousal, extended wakefulness, increased perceptions of sleepiness and reduced total sleep obtained explained these decrements in performance. While cumulative fatigue has been reported as a challenge associated with night shift work, there was no conclusive evidence of this in the current study. In the case of the Rolling rotation, the gradual introduction to the night shift delayed the inevitable reduction in alertness and performance, which limits the viability of this intervention. The inclusion of the nap interventions was associated with reduced perceptions of sleepiness, which did not translate into improved performance, relative to the Rolling rotation and Fixed night conditions. Apart from considerations of how to manage sleep inertia post nap, the split shift nap intervention can provide an alternative to conventional night shift work arrangements.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2016
Validation of an assessment tool for mental fatigue applied to rotational shift work
- Authors: Huysamen, Kirsten Christina
- Date: 2014
- Subjects: Mental fatigue , Shift systems , Performance , Motor ability , Memory
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: vital:5154 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1013551
- Description: Mental fatigue has been proven to be highly prominent during shift work, due to long, irregular working hours and disruption of the circadian rhythm. Measuring mental fatigue has been a challenge for many years, where commonly cognitive test tasks are used to assess mental fatigue. Moreover, these test tasks do not isolate where fatigue is occurring during human information processing. The human information processing system consists of four core stages, each of which requires numerous cognitive functions in order to process information. The Human Kinetics and Ergonomics Department at Rhodes University has developed six cognitive test tasks where each isolates a cognitive function: an accommodation test task, a visual detection test task, a reading test task, a memory test task, a tapping test task and a neural control test task. The cognitive functions include: eye accommodation, visual discrimination, visual pattern recognition, memory duration, motor programming and peripheral neural control. General task-related effect can also be examined for each of these cognitive test tasks which include choice reaction time, visual detection, reading performance, short-term memory, motor control and tracking performance. Additionally, a simple reaction time test task has been developed to analyse simple reaction time. This test task does not isolate a cognitive function. One or more parameters can be examined for each cognitive function and task-related effect. The first aim of this study was to validate numerous cognitive test tasks for mental fatigue in a simulated shift work laboratory setting. The second aim was to assess the validated cognitive test tasks in Phase 1 in a field-based rotational shift work setting. Parameters revealing sensitivity to mental fatigue would be validated for mental fatigue applied to rotational shift work and would be inserted into an assessment tool. In the laboratory setting, the seven cognitive test tasks were examined on four different types of shift work regimes. The first regime was a standard eight-hour shift work system, and the other three were non-conventional shift work regimes. Participants (n = 12 per regime) were required to complete one day shift followed by four night shifts, where testing occurred before and after each shift and four times within each shift. The cognitive test tasks revealing sensitivity to fatigue included: visual detection test task, reading test task, memory test task, tapping test task, neural control test task and simple reaction time test task. The testing of Phase 2 was conducted in three different companies, where each performed a different type of rotational shift work. The six cognitive test tasks validated for mental fatigue in Phase 1 were tested before and after work for each shift type within the rotational shift work system adopted by each company. Company A (n = 18) and Company B (n = 24) performed two-shift rotational shift work systems, where the shift length of Company A was 12-hours and the shift length of Company B was irregular hours. Company C (n = 21) performed an eight-hour three-shift rotational shift work system. Nine parameters revealed fatiguing effects and were inserted into the assessment tool, five of which provided information on a specific cognitive function: error rate for visual discrimination, processing time for visual pattern recognition, error rate for visual pattern recognition, impact of rehearsal time on memory recall rate for memory duration and the high-precision condition for motor programming time. The remaining four parameters provided information on general task-related effects: reading speed for reading performance, recall rate for short-term memory, reaction time for motor control and simple reaction time. Therefore, an assessment tool comprising nine parameters was validated for mental fatigue applied to rotational shift work, where five of the parameters were able to isolate exactly where fatigue was occurring during human information processing and the other four parameters were able to assess fatigue occurring throughout the human information processing chain.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2014
- Authors: Huysamen, Kirsten Christina
- Date: 2014
- Subjects: Mental fatigue , Shift systems , Performance , Motor ability , Memory
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: vital:5154 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1013551
- Description: Mental fatigue has been proven to be highly prominent during shift work, due to long, irregular working hours and disruption of the circadian rhythm. Measuring mental fatigue has been a challenge for many years, where commonly cognitive test tasks are used to assess mental fatigue. Moreover, these test tasks do not isolate where fatigue is occurring during human information processing. The human information processing system consists of four core stages, each of which requires numerous cognitive functions in order to process information. The Human Kinetics and Ergonomics Department at Rhodes University has developed six cognitive test tasks where each isolates a cognitive function: an accommodation test task, a visual detection test task, a reading test task, a memory test task, a tapping test task and a neural control test task. The cognitive functions include: eye accommodation, visual discrimination, visual pattern recognition, memory duration, motor programming and peripheral neural control. General task-related effect can also be examined for each of these cognitive test tasks which include choice reaction time, visual detection, reading performance, short-term memory, motor control and tracking performance. Additionally, a simple reaction time test task has been developed to analyse simple reaction time. This test task does not isolate a cognitive function. One or more parameters can be examined for each cognitive function and task-related effect. The first aim of this study was to validate numerous cognitive test tasks for mental fatigue in a simulated shift work laboratory setting. The second aim was to assess the validated cognitive test tasks in Phase 1 in a field-based rotational shift work setting. Parameters revealing sensitivity to mental fatigue would be validated for mental fatigue applied to rotational shift work and would be inserted into an assessment tool. In the laboratory setting, the seven cognitive test tasks were examined on four different types of shift work regimes. The first regime was a standard eight-hour shift work system, and the other three were non-conventional shift work regimes. Participants (n = 12 per regime) were required to complete one day shift followed by four night shifts, where testing occurred before and after each shift and four times within each shift. The cognitive test tasks revealing sensitivity to fatigue included: visual detection test task, reading test task, memory test task, tapping test task, neural control test task and simple reaction time test task. The testing of Phase 2 was conducted in three different companies, where each performed a different type of rotational shift work. The six cognitive test tasks validated for mental fatigue in Phase 1 were tested before and after work for each shift type within the rotational shift work system adopted by each company. Company A (n = 18) and Company B (n = 24) performed two-shift rotational shift work systems, where the shift length of Company A was 12-hours and the shift length of Company B was irregular hours. Company C (n = 21) performed an eight-hour three-shift rotational shift work system. Nine parameters revealed fatiguing effects and were inserted into the assessment tool, five of which provided information on a specific cognitive function: error rate for visual discrimination, processing time for visual pattern recognition, error rate for visual pattern recognition, impact of rehearsal time on memory recall rate for memory duration and the high-precision condition for motor programming time. The remaining four parameters provided information on general task-related effects: reading speed for reading performance, recall rate for short-term memory, reaction time for motor control and simple reaction time. Therefore, an assessment tool comprising nine parameters was validated for mental fatigue applied to rotational shift work, where five of the parameters were able to isolate exactly where fatigue was occurring during human information processing and the other four parameters were able to assess fatigue occurring throughout the human information processing chain.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2014
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »