Examining the reasons for the exclusion of pregnant learners from school through the school governing body pregnancy policy
- Bamidele, James Seidu https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6641-0385
- Authors: Bamidele, James Seidu https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6641-0385
- Date: 2017-07
- Subjects: School board members , Pregnant teenagers , Human rights
- Language: English
- Type: Master's theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/22979 , vital:53375
- Description: Discrimination is a serious violation of human rights and it is strongly condemned by various legal instruments in South Africa. The South African Constitution (1996), Promotion of Administration Justice Act (2000) and Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act (2000) forbade discrimination and exclusion of pregnant learners from school. In spite of these legislative frameworks, School Governing Body (SGB) continues to exclude pregnant learners from school. SGB claimed that pregnant learners are harmful to other female learners and is becoming a significant barrier to girls’ education. Research shows that learners’ pregnancy is predominant in rural areas, apparently poses a threat to female education (Annual School Survey Report, 2010). The purpose of this dissertation is to establish that SGB lacks power to do so; however, their resistance to the law by excluding the pregnant learners from school is in conflict with the South African Constitution. This dissertation investigated an alternative instrument of legal remedy to reduce the problem of learners’ pregnancy rather than exclusion. The theoretical framework of this study is informed by Public Policy Theory (Ijeoma, 2010). Literatures and scholarly works on education law (Oosthuizen, 2015) and articles on Learners’ pregnancy shall be reviewed (Morell, Bhana & Shefer, 2012). The study followed qualitative research method which utilizes a transformative research paradigm that provides a collective voice for the participants. The data is collected through focused interview and open-ended questions, and subsequently analysed to establish that SGB lacks power to exclude a pregnant learner from school. Finally, the study reveals an alternative instrument of legal remedy to reduce the alarming number of pregnant learners rather than exclusion. , Thesis (MEd) -- Faculty of Education, 2017
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017-07
- Authors: Bamidele, James Seidu https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6641-0385
- Date: 2017-07
- Subjects: School board members , Pregnant teenagers , Human rights
- Language: English
- Type: Master's theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/22979 , vital:53375
- Description: Discrimination is a serious violation of human rights and it is strongly condemned by various legal instruments in South Africa. The South African Constitution (1996), Promotion of Administration Justice Act (2000) and Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act (2000) forbade discrimination and exclusion of pregnant learners from school. In spite of these legislative frameworks, School Governing Body (SGB) continues to exclude pregnant learners from school. SGB claimed that pregnant learners are harmful to other female learners and is becoming a significant barrier to girls’ education. Research shows that learners’ pregnancy is predominant in rural areas, apparently poses a threat to female education (Annual School Survey Report, 2010). The purpose of this dissertation is to establish that SGB lacks power to do so; however, their resistance to the law by excluding the pregnant learners from school is in conflict with the South African Constitution. This dissertation investigated an alternative instrument of legal remedy to reduce the problem of learners’ pregnancy rather than exclusion. The theoretical framework of this study is informed by Public Policy Theory (Ijeoma, 2010). Literatures and scholarly works on education law (Oosthuizen, 2015) and articles on Learners’ pregnancy shall be reviewed (Morell, Bhana & Shefer, 2012). The study followed qualitative research method which utilizes a transformative research paradigm that provides a collective voice for the participants. The data is collected through focused interview and open-ended questions, and subsequently analysed to establish that SGB lacks power to exclude a pregnant learner from school. Finally, the study reveals an alternative instrument of legal remedy to reduce the alarming number of pregnant learners rather than exclusion. , Thesis (MEd) -- Faculty of Education, 2017
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017-07
The role of the liberation movements’ archives in shaping history writing in a post-apartheid South Africa
- Authors: Maamoe, Mosoabuli
- Date: 2017-07
- Subjects: Archives , Apartheid , National liberation movements--South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Doctoral theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/23045 , vital:55287
- Description: This study offers a comprehensive examination of the Role of the Liberation Movements’ Archives in Shaping History Writing in a Post-Apartheid South Africa. It is based on the Liberation Archives housed at the National Heritage and Cultural Studies (NAHECS) at the University of Fort Hare, near the town of Alice in the Eastern Cape Province. A new narrative, grounded in the exploration and advantages of the use of these materials in their totality, given the new environment of research created under the new dispensation, has now become possible. The first chapter begins with an overview of the nature of archives in general and proceeds from there to consider the unique circumstances under which the different liberation movements of South Africa constructed their archives, and how these circumstances affected the nature of the materials preserved therein. One key point made here is that the liberation movement, as it spearheaded the struggle against apartheid, had already positioned itself as a “Government in Waiting,” convinced of the justness of its cause, and of the ultimate defeat of apartheid leading to he political seizure of power by the people. Hence, it created struggle materials seen as vehicles for the realisation and attainment of this objective. For this purpose, the appropriate housekeeping, viewing, consultation and access is absolutely relevant. The second chapter looks at the changing environment in which the repatriation of the struggle archives was implemented, and the decision to place them specifically at the University of Fort Hare and challenges. The third chapter narrates the difficulties encountered following the location of documents at Fort Hare, contestations, and contradictions between the stakeholders and the ultimate resolutions. The fourth and longest chapter goes to the heart of this thesis which dispel the myths created by the colonists and their historians intended to obscure the oppressed into embracing a historiography of South Africa that crossly flawed and distorted, silent and ignorant of reflecting early African societal developments which were evolving undisturbed at their own rate under socio-cultural and geographical conditions prior the advent of colonialism and the consequences. Therefore, based on these circumstances one can see that the installation of the new dispensation was not the end of the struggle, but the opening of a new chapter, the struggle against the conceptual legacy of apartheid and its vestiges. An evaluation of the consultation and exploitation of the archival collections comprises this subject in the last chapter of this study. Perusing them, one learns and realizes that the objective of the liberation movements was immense, to reconnect the marginalised of their once trampled and vilified history in order to inspire and empower them to reclaim their lost sense of belonging, identity, pride and to restore their humanity. This has been vindicated by the wide range of researchers and viewers from home and afar who have turned out to consult the archives in order to unpack the complexities of the South African history and that of the struggle. The information they contain serve as guides of addressing such complexities to arrest current transitional challenges, and offer solutions for some in articulating a need of building a new cohesive nation in a post-apartheid era. This is precisely what the liberation movement had in mind when it took a decision to gather together the struggle materials and have them repatriated for preservation and access purposes. It was not just generosity on its part, but also a display of the patriotic and passionate responsibility to the oppressed in particular and humanity in general to fathom and unpack the complexities of the South African historiography. , Thesis (PhD) -- Faculty of Social Science and Humanities,2021
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017-07
- Authors: Maamoe, Mosoabuli
- Date: 2017-07
- Subjects: Archives , Apartheid , National liberation movements--South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Doctoral theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/23045 , vital:55287
- Description: This study offers a comprehensive examination of the Role of the Liberation Movements’ Archives in Shaping History Writing in a Post-Apartheid South Africa. It is based on the Liberation Archives housed at the National Heritage and Cultural Studies (NAHECS) at the University of Fort Hare, near the town of Alice in the Eastern Cape Province. A new narrative, grounded in the exploration and advantages of the use of these materials in their totality, given the new environment of research created under the new dispensation, has now become possible. The first chapter begins with an overview of the nature of archives in general and proceeds from there to consider the unique circumstances under which the different liberation movements of South Africa constructed their archives, and how these circumstances affected the nature of the materials preserved therein. One key point made here is that the liberation movement, as it spearheaded the struggle against apartheid, had already positioned itself as a “Government in Waiting,” convinced of the justness of its cause, and of the ultimate defeat of apartheid leading to he political seizure of power by the people. Hence, it created struggle materials seen as vehicles for the realisation and attainment of this objective. For this purpose, the appropriate housekeeping, viewing, consultation and access is absolutely relevant. The second chapter looks at the changing environment in which the repatriation of the struggle archives was implemented, and the decision to place them specifically at the University of Fort Hare and challenges. The third chapter narrates the difficulties encountered following the location of documents at Fort Hare, contestations, and contradictions between the stakeholders and the ultimate resolutions. The fourth and longest chapter goes to the heart of this thesis which dispel the myths created by the colonists and their historians intended to obscure the oppressed into embracing a historiography of South Africa that crossly flawed and distorted, silent and ignorant of reflecting early African societal developments which were evolving undisturbed at their own rate under socio-cultural and geographical conditions prior the advent of colonialism and the consequences. Therefore, based on these circumstances one can see that the installation of the new dispensation was not the end of the struggle, but the opening of a new chapter, the struggle against the conceptual legacy of apartheid and its vestiges. An evaluation of the consultation and exploitation of the archival collections comprises this subject in the last chapter of this study. Perusing them, one learns and realizes that the objective of the liberation movements was immense, to reconnect the marginalised of their once trampled and vilified history in order to inspire and empower them to reclaim their lost sense of belonging, identity, pride and to restore their humanity. This has been vindicated by the wide range of researchers and viewers from home and afar who have turned out to consult the archives in order to unpack the complexities of the South African history and that of the struggle. The information they contain serve as guides of addressing such complexities to arrest current transitional challenges, and offer solutions for some in articulating a need of building a new cohesive nation in a post-apartheid era. This is precisely what the liberation movement had in mind when it took a decision to gather together the struggle materials and have them repatriated for preservation and access purposes. It was not just generosity on its part, but also a display of the patriotic and passionate responsibility to the oppressed in particular and humanity in general to fathom and unpack the complexities of the South African historiography. , Thesis (PhD) -- Faculty of Social Science and Humanities,2021
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017-07
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »