A comparative study of the dosimetric features of α-Al2O3: C, Mg and α-Al2O3: C
- Kalita, Jitumani M, Chithambo, Makaiko L
- Authors: Kalita, Jitumani M , Chithambo, Makaiko L
- Date: 2017
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/113058 , vital:33694 , https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncx039
- Description: A comparative study of the dosimetric features of α-Al2O3:C,Mg and α-Al2O3:C relevant to thermoluminescence dosimetry is reported. A glow curve of α-Al2O3:C,Mg measured at 1°C/s after beta irradiation to 1 Gy shows two subsidiary peaks at 42°C (labelled as I) and 72°C (II) and the main peak at 161°C (III) whereas a glow curve of α-Al2O3:C measured under the same conditions shows the main peak at 178°C (II′) and a lower intensity peak at 48°C (I′). Apart from these ones, there are several other peaks at temperatures beyond that of the main peak in both α-Al2O3:C,Mg and α-Al2O3:C. However, the latter are not included in this study. We report a comparative quantitative analysis of dose response and fading of peaks I, II and III of α-Al2O3:C,Mg and peaks I′ and II′ of α-Al2O3:C. Analysis shows that the dose response of peaks I and III is sublinear within 1–10 Gy whereas that of peak II is superlinear within 1–4 Gy followed by a sublinear region within 4–10 Gy. In comparison, the dose response of peak I′ is superlinear within 1–4 Gy followed by a sublinear region within 4–10 Gy whereas that of peak II′ is sublinear within 1–4 Gy followed by a superlinear region within 4–10 Gy. As regards to fading corresponding to 1 Gy, peak I is very unstable and fades within 300 s, peak II is more stable and takes up to 43200 s to fade. In comparison, peak III fades down to 30% of its initial intensity within 2400 s. Interestingly, between 2400 and 800 s, the intensity fades by 17% only. Regarding fading in α-Al2O3:C, peak I′ fades within 600 s whereas peak II′ shows an inverse fading behaviour up to 64800 s. The rate of fading for peaks I, II and III in α-Al2O3:C,Mg was found to decrease with increase in dose. However, no such behaviour was observed in α-Al2O3:C. The fading in both samples is discussed on the basis of a charge hopping mechanism.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Kalita, Jitumani M , Chithambo, Makaiko L
- Date: 2017
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/113058 , vital:33694 , https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncx039
- Description: A comparative study of the dosimetric features of α-Al2O3:C,Mg and α-Al2O3:C relevant to thermoluminescence dosimetry is reported. A glow curve of α-Al2O3:C,Mg measured at 1°C/s after beta irradiation to 1 Gy shows two subsidiary peaks at 42°C (labelled as I) and 72°C (II) and the main peak at 161°C (III) whereas a glow curve of α-Al2O3:C measured under the same conditions shows the main peak at 178°C (II′) and a lower intensity peak at 48°C (I′). Apart from these ones, there are several other peaks at temperatures beyond that of the main peak in both α-Al2O3:C,Mg and α-Al2O3:C. However, the latter are not included in this study. We report a comparative quantitative analysis of dose response and fading of peaks I, II and III of α-Al2O3:C,Mg and peaks I′ and II′ of α-Al2O3:C. Analysis shows that the dose response of peaks I and III is sublinear within 1–10 Gy whereas that of peak II is superlinear within 1–4 Gy followed by a sublinear region within 4–10 Gy. In comparison, the dose response of peak I′ is superlinear within 1–4 Gy followed by a sublinear region within 4–10 Gy whereas that of peak II′ is sublinear within 1–4 Gy followed by a superlinear region within 4–10 Gy. As regards to fading corresponding to 1 Gy, peak I is very unstable and fades within 300 s, peak II is more stable and takes up to 43200 s to fade. In comparison, peak III fades down to 30% of its initial intensity within 2400 s. Interestingly, between 2400 and 800 s, the intensity fades by 17% only. Regarding fading in α-Al2O3:C, peak I′ fades within 600 s whereas peak II′ shows an inverse fading behaviour up to 64800 s. The rate of fading for peaks I, II and III in α-Al2O3:C,Mg was found to decrease with increase in dose. However, no such behaviour was observed in α-Al2O3:C. The fading in both samples is discussed on the basis of a charge hopping mechanism.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
Dose response and kinetic analysis of thermoluminescence of Li–Zn fluoroborate glass
- Thomas, Sunil, Chithambo, Makaiko L
- Authors: Thomas, Sunil , Chithambo, Makaiko L
- Date: 2017
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/116164 , vital:34326 , https://doi.org/10.1080/10420150.2017.1313844
- Description: The intention of this study is to explore the thermoluminescence properties of beta-irradiated Li–Zn fluoroborate glass. The glow-curve corresponding to 10 Gy shows two peaks when measured at 1°C/s. The dose response of the glass to beta irradiation was investigated. The trapping level parameters such as activation energy, frequency factor and order of kinetics associated with the observed glow-peak were determined using different methods. The thermoluminescence is affected by thermal quenching. A possible mechanism for the thermoluminescence is described.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Thomas, Sunil , Chithambo, Makaiko L
- Date: 2017
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/116164 , vital:34326 , https://doi.org/10.1080/10420150.2017.1313844
- Description: The intention of this study is to explore the thermoluminescence properties of beta-irradiated Li–Zn fluoroborate glass. The glow-curve corresponding to 10 Gy shows two peaks when measured at 1°C/s. The dose response of the glass to beta irradiation was investigated. The trapping level parameters such as activation energy, frequency factor and order of kinetics associated with the observed glow-peak were determined using different methods. The thermoluminescence is affected by thermal quenching. A possible mechanism for the thermoluminescence is described.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
Relative features of the principal and secondary luminescence lifetimes in quartz
- Chithambo, Makaiko L, Ogundare, F O
- Authors: Chithambo, Makaiko L , Ogundare, F O
- Date: 2017
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/125821 , vital:35820 , https://doi.10.1002/pssc.200673721
- Description: Quartz is a common natural mineral with properties that make it amenable for application in radiation dosimetry using luminescence methods [1]. The luminescence properties of quartz including its sensitivity and luminescence lifetimes undergo notable changes when the quartz is annealed, and in particular, near its phase inversion temperatures of 573 and 867 oC [2, 3]. The physical processes leading up to the emission of luminescence in quartz may be investigated using time-resolved optical stimulation. The aim of this method is to separate in time the stimulation and emission of luminescence to enable measurement of time-resolved luminescence spectra which may be resolved into associated lifetimes, defined in this sense as the delay between stimulation and emission of luminescence [4, 5]. A number of such studies show that annealing defines the detailed distribution of lifetimes with measurement temperature as well as the irradiation-dependent characteristics of the lifetimes [3, 6]. In particular, it was noted [3] that spectra measured at certain temperatures could be accurately resolved into more than one component, a scenario that pointed to the possibility of involvement of multiple luminescence centers in the emission of luminescence from quartz. The aim of this work is to build on the findings described, specifically to study the influence of measurement temperature and irradiation on the principal and subsidiary luminescence lifetimes in natural quartz.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- Authors: Chithambo, Makaiko L , Ogundare, F O
- Date: 2017
- Language: English
- Type: text , article
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/125821 , vital:35820 , https://doi.10.1002/pssc.200673721
- Description: Quartz is a common natural mineral with properties that make it amenable for application in radiation dosimetry using luminescence methods [1]. The luminescence properties of quartz including its sensitivity and luminescence lifetimes undergo notable changes when the quartz is annealed, and in particular, near its phase inversion temperatures of 573 and 867 oC [2, 3]. The physical processes leading up to the emission of luminescence in quartz may be investigated using time-resolved optical stimulation. The aim of this method is to separate in time the stimulation and emission of luminescence to enable measurement of time-resolved luminescence spectra which may be resolved into associated lifetimes, defined in this sense as the delay between stimulation and emission of luminescence [4, 5]. A number of such studies show that annealing defines the detailed distribution of lifetimes with measurement temperature as well as the irradiation-dependent characteristics of the lifetimes [3, 6]. In particular, it was noted [3] that spectra measured at certain temperatures could be accurately resolved into more than one component, a scenario that pointed to the possibility of involvement of multiple luminescence centers in the emission of luminescence from quartz. The aim of this work is to build on the findings described, specifically to study the influence of measurement temperature and irradiation on the principal and subsidiary luminescence lifetimes in natural quartz.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2017
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »