The role of the CCMA and bargaining councils in labour dispute resolution
- Authors: Mkalipi, Thembinkosi
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: South Africa -- Commission for Conciliation, Mediation, and Arbitration , Dispute resolution (Law) -- South Africa Arbitration, Industrial -- South Africa Collective bargaining -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/32182 , vital:31977
- Description: A feature of collective bargaining is that it has a habit of ending in deadlock. However, in the event of a dispute, an aggrieved party is not free to call an immediate strike or lockout. The Labour Relations Act of 1956 and the Labour Relations Act of 1995 (“the LRA”) provided for a strict procedure to be followed in an event of a dispute. The law before 1995 regarded industrial action in the case of a dispute that did not follow the procedure as an illegal act attracting criminal sanction. The law then distinguished between a dispute of right and a dispute of interest. Like many countries, South Africa, has a very violent history regarding the resolution of labour disputes. This is illustrated by the force and brutality that was used to solve the 1913 white miners’ strike after martial law was declared. The reaction of the employers and the state was more brutal. The same violence and brutality were applied in the 1914 railway-workers strike and the 1946 African workers strike. The most important purpose of labour law is to ensure labour peace will prevail in the labour market and to regulate relations between employer and employee. Labour peace ensures that the economy functions effectively and if this happens, society at large benefits greatly. In Chapter 1 of the LRA one of the purposes of the LRA is stated as: “the effective resolution of labour disputes.” This section is intended to give effect section 23(1) of the Constitution, which provide that, ‘‘everyone has the right to fair labour practices’’1. This treatise will analyse the role of the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (the CCMA) in dispute resolution; its functions and jurisdiction, ensure labour peace and whether the dispute resolution system provided in the law and implemented by the different dispute resolution institutions have succeeded to advance Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 108 [1996]. Economic development, social justice, labour peace and the democratisation of the workplace to fulfil the purpose of the LRA. Under the previous Labour Relations Act2 (the “1956 LRA”) disputes were resolved through three main institutions namely, Conciliation Boards, Industrial Councils and the Industrial Court3. A Conciliation Board was on ad hoc - body established by the Minister of Manpower on application by any one of the parties in dispute. There was no requirement for an agreement between the disputing parties to apply for the establishment of a Conciliation Board. Either party could approach the Minister for its establishment. This application could be made on the workers side by one or more registered trade unions, one or more employees, or one or more registered trade unions. On the employer’s side, the application can be made by one or more registered employers’ organisations or, one or more employers.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Mkalipi, Thembinkosi
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: South Africa -- Commission for Conciliation, Mediation, and Arbitration , Dispute resolution (Law) -- South Africa Arbitration, Industrial -- South Africa Collective bargaining -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/32182 , vital:31977
- Description: A feature of collective bargaining is that it has a habit of ending in deadlock. However, in the event of a dispute, an aggrieved party is not free to call an immediate strike or lockout. The Labour Relations Act of 1956 and the Labour Relations Act of 1995 (“the LRA”) provided for a strict procedure to be followed in an event of a dispute. The law before 1995 regarded industrial action in the case of a dispute that did not follow the procedure as an illegal act attracting criminal sanction. The law then distinguished between a dispute of right and a dispute of interest. Like many countries, South Africa, has a very violent history regarding the resolution of labour disputes. This is illustrated by the force and brutality that was used to solve the 1913 white miners’ strike after martial law was declared. The reaction of the employers and the state was more brutal. The same violence and brutality were applied in the 1914 railway-workers strike and the 1946 African workers strike. The most important purpose of labour law is to ensure labour peace will prevail in the labour market and to regulate relations between employer and employee. Labour peace ensures that the economy functions effectively and if this happens, society at large benefits greatly. In Chapter 1 of the LRA one of the purposes of the LRA is stated as: “the effective resolution of labour disputes.” This section is intended to give effect section 23(1) of the Constitution, which provide that, ‘‘everyone has the right to fair labour practices’’1. This treatise will analyse the role of the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (the CCMA) in dispute resolution; its functions and jurisdiction, ensure labour peace and whether the dispute resolution system provided in the law and implemented by the different dispute resolution institutions have succeeded to advance Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 108 [1996]. Economic development, social justice, labour peace and the democratisation of the workplace to fulfil the purpose of the LRA. Under the previous Labour Relations Act2 (the “1956 LRA”) disputes were resolved through three main institutions namely, Conciliation Boards, Industrial Councils and the Industrial Court3. A Conciliation Board was on ad hoc - body established by the Minister of Manpower on application by any one of the parties in dispute. There was no requirement for an agreement between the disputing parties to apply for the establishment of a Conciliation Board. Either party could approach the Minister for its establishment. This application could be made on the workers side by one or more registered trade unions, one or more employees, or one or more registered trade unions. On the employer’s side, the application can be made by one or more registered employers’ organisations or, one or more employers.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
The unfair labour practice relating to suspension
- Authors: Moela, Matlose Phineas
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Unfair labor practices -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa Labor policy -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/23038 , vital:30398
- Description: This treatise considers unfair-labour- practice relating to suspensions in the workplace. Furthermore the treatise outlines the legal framework relating to suspensions in the workplace. As I explore this fundamental issues of the law, the fairness relating to suspension will be examined. Some recommendations are also made as to how departments and organisations must develop guidelines and policies which are legally sound to deal with suspension in the workplace. Employees often challenge the fairness of their suspension in the workplace. These challenges are based on a number of things, including failure to provide an employee to make representations, failure to comply with policies regulating suspensions in the workplace, suspension without pay, prolonged suspensions, etc. The treatise therefore also consider these challenges as well as the recourse available to employees. The treatise commences with the legal framework and principles contained in the Labour Relations Act, 66 of 1995 (hereinafter referred to as the LRA) applicable to suspensions. The treatise then considers other legislation and recent developments in both the public and private sector. The study concludes with remedies available to employees in instances where an unfair-labour-practice relating to suspension has been found to be committed by an employer during the suspension process.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Moela, Matlose Phineas
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Unfair labor practices -- South Africa , Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa Labor policy -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/23038 , vital:30398
- Description: This treatise considers unfair-labour- practice relating to suspensions in the workplace. Furthermore the treatise outlines the legal framework relating to suspensions in the workplace. As I explore this fundamental issues of the law, the fairness relating to suspension will be examined. Some recommendations are also made as to how departments and organisations must develop guidelines and policies which are legally sound to deal with suspension in the workplace. Employees often challenge the fairness of their suspension in the workplace. These challenges are based on a number of things, including failure to provide an employee to make representations, failure to comply with policies regulating suspensions in the workplace, suspension without pay, prolonged suspensions, etc. The treatise therefore also consider these challenges as well as the recourse available to employees. The treatise commences with the legal framework and principles contained in the Labour Relations Act, 66 of 1995 (hereinafter referred to as the LRA) applicable to suspensions. The treatise then considers other legislation and recent developments in both the public and private sector. The study concludes with remedies available to employees in instances where an unfair-labour-practice relating to suspension has been found to be committed by an employer during the suspension process.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
The praxis of reasonability and onus of proof in tax administration in South Africa
- Authors: Mostert, Tarita
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Tax administration and procedure -- South Africa , Taxation -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Internal revenue law -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/22802 , vital:30091
- Description: The legal principles of reasonableness and the burden of proof date back to ancient times. The first codification of these principles occurred in Roman Law. The Tax Administration Act incorporates these principles in various sections. The purpose of this treatise as formulated in Chapter 1 was to determine whether there is a close connection (in practice) between tax administration (within the context of the Tax Administration Act) and the principles of reasonableness and the burden of proof. SARS acknowledges that the principles of best international practice in tax administration must be taken into account1. These principles include equity, fairness, certainty, simplicity, efficiency and effectiveness. Effective tax administration entails that a balance must be struck between the rights and obligations of the taxpayers and those of SARS2. It is important that the taxpayers and SARS strive to communicate with one another in an efficient and effective manner in order to resolve disputes between them. The treatise followed a logical approach. This entailed that the general interpretation of aspects had to be followed by the tax specific interpretation of the aspects. The general interpretation included an analysis of case law as well as research into the origins of the principles of reasonableness and the burden of proof. Reasonableness and the burden of proof do not require perfection. It is important, however, that assertions must be accompanied by evidence. The quality and quantity of evidence submitted is dependent upon the relevant facts and circumstances of a matter. The facts and circumstances of a matter also constitute determining factors in 1 Draft Explanatory Memorandum on the Draft Tax Administration Bill, 2009 at 1 in 2.5. 2 Ibid in 2.1.evaluating whether the principles of reasonableness and the burden of proof have been applied. The treatise concludes that increased efforts are necessary in order to ensure that the principles of reasonableness and the burden of proof are adhered to in tax administration. This obligation is not limited to SARS but also includes taxpayers and tax practitioners. This is closely linked to effective and efficient communication.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Mostert, Tarita
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Tax administration and procedure -- South Africa , Taxation -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Internal revenue law -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/22802 , vital:30091
- Description: The legal principles of reasonableness and the burden of proof date back to ancient times. The first codification of these principles occurred in Roman Law. The Tax Administration Act incorporates these principles in various sections. The purpose of this treatise as formulated in Chapter 1 was to determine whether there is a close connection (in practice) between tax administration (within the context of the Tax Administration Act) and the principles of reasonableness and the burden of proof. SARS acknowledges that the principles of best international practice in tax administration must be taken into account1. These principles include equity, fairness, certainty, simplicity, efficiency and effectiveness. Effective tax administration entails that a balance must be struck between the rights and obligations of the taxpayers and those of SARS2. It is important that the taxpayers and SARS strive to communicate with one another in an efficient and effective manner in order to resolve disputes between them. The treatise followed a logical approach. This entailed that the general interpretation of aspects had to be followed by the tax specific interpretation of the aspects. The general interpretation included an analysis of case law as well as research into the origins of the principles of reasonableness and the burden of proof. Reasonableness and the burden of proof do not require perfection. It is important, however, that assertions must be accompanied by evidence. The quality and quantity of evidence submitted is dependent upon the relevant facts and circumstances of a matter. The facts and circumstances of a matter also constitute determining factors in 1 Draft Explanatory Memorandum on the Draft Tax Administration Bill, 2009 at 1 in 2.5. 2 Ibid in 2.1.evaluating whether the principles of reasonableness and the burden of proof have been applied. The treatise concludes that increased efforts are necessary in order to ensure that the principles of reasonableness and the burden of proof are adhered to in tax administration. This obligation is not limited to SARS but also includes taxpayers and tax practitioners. This is closely linked to effective and efficient communication.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
Unfair discrimination and affirmative action in the workplace
- Authors: Motona, Johannes
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Discrimination in employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Unfair labor practices -- South Africa Affirmative action programs -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/32300 , vital:32007
- Description: South Africa enacted the following legislation, the Constitution, the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 and the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 and the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995. In terms of the Constitution a notion of substantive equality was incorporated in the Bill of Rights. Section 9 of the Constitution specifically provides that no person may be discriminated against and provides a list of grounds which are specifically prohibited. Furthermore, the Constitution affirms the values of equality, dignity and freedom. The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 aims at eliminating social and economic inequalities which were created by apartheid. The Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 is similar to the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act and takes into consideration the inequalities in employment, occupation and income which exist as a result of apartheid. In maintaining the objective of this treatise, section 6(2) of the EEA must be seen as an extension of and read in light of section 9(2) of the Constitution which provides that equality includes the full and equal enjoyment of all rights and freedoms and permits the use of legislative and other measures, designed to protect or advance persons or categories of persons disadvantaged by unfair discrimination in the past for the purpose of achieving substantive equality. Therefore, section 6(2)(a) of the EEA may be considered the statutory equivalent of section 9(2) of the Constitution. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 has a key and crucial commitment to substantive equality and to correct the imbalances of the past and to create a less divided society in which the constitutional democracy can be advanced. The Constitution identifies human dignity, the achievement of equality and the advancement of human rights and freedoms as some of the basic values upon which South Africa is founded. The Constitution restraints the state and any person from unfairly discriminating on grounds that adversely impacts upon dignity. It further empowers the state to take legislative and other measures to advance persons previously disadvantaged by unfair discrimination. This treatise covers the test for affirmative action as in the Harksen Test, Minister of Finance v Van Heerden and recently strengthened in Solidarity obo Barnard v SA Police Services. It also deals with the Barnard trilogy. Of significance is that the Constitutional Court judgment in Barnard is the first Constitutional Court judgment dealing with affirmative action and its application in terms of the EEA. The judgment strengthens the Constitutional Court finding in Van Heerden in that a restitutionary measure such as affirmative action is not presumed unfair unless it complies with the section 9(2) “internal test”. The Post Barnard Judgment is also discussed in this treatise with reference to the following cases: Mgolozeli v Gauteng Department of Finance and Another, Solidarity and the Department of Correctional Services, South Africa Police Service v the Public Service Association of South Africa: Captain Munsamy and another and Solidarity v the Minister of Safety and Security and others.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Motona, Johannes
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Discrimination in employment -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Unfair labor practices -- South Africa Affirmative action programs -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/32300 , vital:32007
- Description: South Africa enacted the following legislation, the Constitution, the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 and the Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 and the Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995. In terms of the Constitution a notion of substantive equality was incorporated in the Bill of Rights. Section 9 of the Constitution specifically provides that no person may be discriminated against and provides a list of grounds which are specifically prohibited. Furthermore, the Constitution affirms the values of equality, dignity and freedom. The Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000 aims at eliminating social and economic inequalities which were created by apartheid. The Employment Equity Act 55 of 1998 is similar to the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act and takes into consideration the inequalities in employment, occupation and income which exist as a result of apartheid. In maintaining the objective of this treatise, section 6(2) of the EEA must be seen as an extension of and read in light of section 9(2) of the Constitution which provides that equality includes the full and equal enjoyment of all rights and freedoms and permits the use of legislative and other measures, designed to protect or advance persons or categories of persons disadvantaged by unfair discrimination in the past for the purpose of achieving substantive equality. Therefore, section 6(2)(a) of the EEA may be considered the statutory equivalent of section 9(2) of the Constitution. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 has a key and crucial commitment to substantive equality and to correct the imbalances of the past and to create a less divided society in which the constitutional democracy can be advanced. The Constitution identifies human dignity, the achievement of equality and the advancement of human rights and freedoms as some of the basic values upon which South Africa is founded. The Constitution restraints the state and any person from unfairly discriminating on grounds that adversely impacts upon dignity. It further empowers the state to take legislative and other measures to advance persons previously disadvantaged by unfair discrimination. This treatise covers the test for affirmative action as in the Harksen Test, Minister of Finance v Van Heerden and recently strengthened in Solidarity obo Barnard v SA Police Services. It also deals with the Barnard trilogy. Of significance is that the Constitutional Court judgment in Barnard is the first Constitutional Court judgment dealing with affirmative action and its application in terms of the EEA. The judgment strengthens the Constitutional Court finding in Van Heerden in that a restitutionary measure such as affirmative action is not presumed unfair unless it complies with the section 9(2) “internal test”. The Post Barnard Judgment is also discussed in this treatise with reference to the following cases: Mgolozeli v Gauteng Department of Finance and Another, Solidarity and the Department of Correctional Services, South Africa Police Service v the Public Service Association of South Africa: Captain Munsamy and another and Solidarity v the Minister of Safety and Security and others.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
The effective use of legal protection to combat stigma and discrimination related to HIV and AIDS in a workplace: a case study in kwa Zulu Natal
- Authors: Ndobeni, Zoliswa Nomawesile
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: AIDS (Disease) -- Law and legislation , Medical policy -- legislation & jurisprudence Public health -- legislation & jurisprudence HIV-positive persons -- Employment -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/32804 , vital:32365
- Description: Stigma and discrimination continue to be the leading cause of everyday cases of new HIV/AIDS infections in spite of the current legal and medical interventions available. The purpose of the study is to explore the effective use of legal protection in combating stigma and discrimination related to HIV/AIDS in the workplace. When it comes to fighting discrimination and stigma against people living with HIV/AIDS, it is still a challenge as these aspects prevent people from coming forward for testing and for prevention as well as treatment service. The rationale for conducting the study is to examine the relationship of the human rights as per the Constitution of South Africa and the spread and impact of HIV/AIDS on individuals in the workplace. The study is of significance to conduct as the research will further provide knowledge and awareness to both the employer and employee regarding the legal framework pertaining to HIV/AIDS and perhaps unintentional consequences of the legal framework to both the employer and employee concerning productivity and growth. Various legal frameworks were determined to address HIV pandemic in South Africa which constitutes one of the utmost challenges facing the nation as well as benchmarking international law. The structure and functioning of the workplace is a key possibility to address developmental inequities in South Africa. This includes the development of healthcare centres in the workplace. HIV testing involves a great deal of risks and consequences that may not be apparent to the patient. Hence, informed consent is required. Policies and guidelines have been put in place to protect employees. HIV clinicians now argue that HIV testing should be presented as a routine procedure, to remove social barriers and stigma. The present study recommends various programmes that may assist in minimizing stigma and discrimination of people living with HIV. This stigma prevent persons from testing for HIV status. The study also seeks to evaluate and review current policies concerning HIV/AIDS.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Ndobeni, Zoliswa Nomawesile
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: AIDS (Disease) -- Law and legislation , Medical policy -- legislation & jurisprudence Public health -- legislation & jurisprudence HIV-positive persons -- Employment -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/32804 , vital:32365
- Description: Stigma and discrimination continue to be the leading cause of everyday cases of new HIV/AIDS infections in spite of the current legal and medical interventions available. The purpose of the study is to explore the effective use of legal protection in combating stigma and discrimination related to HIV/AIDS in the workplace. When it comes to fighting discrimination and stigma against people living with HIV/AIDS, it is still a challenge as these aspects prevent people from coming forward for testing and for prevention as well as treatment service. The rationale for conducting the study is to examine the relationship of the human rights as per the Constitution of South Africa and the spread and impact of HIV/AIDS on individuals in the workplace. The study is of significance to conduct as the research will further provide knowledge and awareness to both the employer and employee regarding the legal framework pertaining to HIV/AIDS and perhaps unintentional consequences of the legal framework to both the employer and employee concerning productivity and growth. Various legal frameworks were determined to address HIV pandemic in South Africa which constitutes one of the utmost challenges facing the nation as well as benchmarking international law. The structure and functioning of the workplace is a key possibility to address developmental inequities in South Africa. This includes the development of healthcare centres in the workplace. HIV testing involves a great deal of risks and consequences that may not be apparent to the patient. Hence, informed consent is required. Policies and guidelines have been put in place to protect employees. HIV clinicians now argue that HIV testing should be presented as a routine procedure, to remove social barriers and stigma. The present study recommends various programmes that may assist in minimizing stigma and discrimination of people living with HIV. This stigma prevent persons from testing for HIV status. The study also seeks to evaluate and review current policies concerning HIV/AIDS.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
Mechanisms for implementing affirmative action
- Authors: Nongogo, Nqabisa Thandazile
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Affirmative action programs -- South Africa , Minorities -- Employment -- South Africa , Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/33475 , vital:32878
- Description: The aim of this study was to analyse the effective implementation of affirmative action. In South Africa. Affirmative action is seen as a means of correcting historical injustices and levelling the playing fields to enable all South Africans to gain equal access to opportunities from which they were previously restricted. This study observed that even though South Africa is now governed by a new democratic order historical workplace inequalities exists which still need to be addressed. Further it was noted that not only compelled to redress inequalities by the Constitution, the South African government was motivated by the ILO to enact laws that would prohibit discrimination and promote the economic advancement of the majority. Therefore, in an effort to narrow the gap between previously advantaged and disadvantaged individuals, the government passed a series of employment laws mandating, amongst other things, affirmative action. By doing so the South African government sought to ensure that all employers are compelled to take positive steps to redress disadvantage and inequality. Be that as it may, the study revealed that affirmative action is theoretically justifiable and has an important role in the achievement of equal opportunities and equality of outcome but in practice, various problems exist. Generally, the study reveals that notwithstanding the legislative framework of affirmative action in South Africa, inequalities continues to exist in employment, a clear signal of inadequate implementation of affirmative action. The study reveals that black people, women and unable persons are identified as primary victims of workplace inequalities. Continuity of work inequalities are statistically portrayed graphically in this year’s (2017) Quarterly Labour Force Survey (QLFS) conducted and published by Statistics South Africa on the Economically Active Population (EAP) still indicates no confidence to implementation of affirmative action measures nationwide. Reviews of implementation of affirmative action, recruitment strategies, retrenchment plans are strongly proposed to combat controversies and challenges surrounding the implementation of affirmative action. A sunset clause is highly recommended to projectize affirmative action. Similarly, with determined advocacy for affirmative action, the study anticipates progressive equality and sustainable justice in South African employment in the immediate future. Chapter five of this study recommends remedial measures to address the challenges and impediments for effective implementation of affirmative action.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Nongogo, Nqabisa Thandazile
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Affirmative action programs -- South Africa , Minorities -- Employment -- South Africa , Affirmative action programs -- Law and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/33475 , vital:32878
- Description: The aim of this study was to analyse the effective implementation of affirmative action. In South Africa. Affirmative action is seen as a means of correcting historical injustices and levelling the playing fields to enable all South Africans to gain equal access to opportunities from which they were previously restricted. This study observed that even though South Africa is now governed by a new democratic order historical workplace inequalities exists which still need to be addressed. Further it was noted that not only compelled to redress inequalities by the Constitution, the South African government was motivated by the ILO to enact laws that would prohibit discrimination and promote the economic advancement of the majority. Therefore, in an effort to narrow the gap between previously advantaged and disadvantaged individuals, the government passed a series of employment laws mandating, amongst other things, affirmative action. By doing so the South African government sought to ensure that all employers are compelled to take positive steps to redress disadvantage and inequality. Be that as it may, the study revealed that affirmative action is theoretically justifiable and has an important role in the achievement of equal opportunities and equality of outcome but in practice, various problems exist. Generally, the study reveals that notwithstanding the legislative framework of affirmative action in South Africa, inequalities continues to exist in employment, a clear signal of inadequate implementation of affirmative action. The study reveals that black people, women and unable persons are identified as primary victims of workplace inequalities. Continuity of work inequalities are statistically portrayed graphically in this year’s (2017) Quarterly Labour Force Survey (QLFS) conducted and published by Statistics South Africa on the Economically Active Population (EAP) still indicates no confidence to implementation of affirmative action measures nationwide. Reviews of implementation of affirmative action, recruitment strategies, retrenchment plans are strongly proposed to combat controversies and challenges surrounding the implementation of affirmative action. A sunset clause is highly recommended to projectize affirmative action. Similarly, with determined advocacy for affirmative action, the study anticipates progressive equality and sustainable justice in South African employment in the immediate future. Chapter five of this study recommends remedial measures to address the challenges and impediments for effective implementation of affirmative action.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
The protection offered in terms of the 2014 labour law amendments to fixed-term Contract and part-time employees
- Authors: Ntsebeza, Uonella
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa , Labor contract -- South Africa Employee rights -- South Africa Labor market -- laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/33567 , vital:32888
- Description: Labour law knows that employers are generally in a stronger bargaining position than employees.1Therefore, labour law is largely premised on the idea of protection of the interest of employees. Fixed term employees2 as ‘atypical’3 or ‘conditional’ employees are particularly weak bargaining parties in the employment relationship. It is common practice for employers to treat fixed term and part-time employees differently to their permanent colleagues. Temporary employment relationships are often associated with the withholding of rights and benefits, lack of job security, deprivation of status and poor remuneration. Fixed term employees are also likely to be more exposed to exploitation, particularly those who are not highly skilled. 4In addition, they often do not enjoy trade union protection and are not covered by collective agreements. Most of these workers are unskilled or work in sectors with limited trade union organisation and limited coverage by collective bargaining, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation. Therefore, fixed term employees are more inclined to depend on the statutory protection enacted to ensure basic working conditions. These employees are often not recruited into trade unions due to the precarious or temporary nature of their work fixed term employees are more inclined to depend on statutory protection enacted to ensure basic working conditions.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Ntsebeza, Uonella
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa , Labor contract -- South Africa Employee rights -- South Africa Labor market -- laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/33567 , vital:32888
- Description: Labour law knows that employers are generally in a stronger bargaining position than employees.1Therefore, labour law is largely premised on the idea of protection of the interest of employees. Fixed term employees2 as ‘atypical’3 or ‘conditional’ employees are particularly weak bargaining parties in the employment relationship. It is common practice for employers to treat fixed term and part-time employees differently to their permanent colleagues. Temporary employment relationships are often associated with the withholding of rights and benefits, lack of job security, deprivation of status and poor remuneration. Fixed term employees are also likely to be more exposed to exploitation, particularly those who are not highly skilled. 4In addition, they often do not enjoy trade union protection and are not covered by collective agreements. Most of these workers are unskilled or work in sectors with limited trade union organisation and limited coverage by collective bargaining, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation. Therefore, fixed term employees are more inclined to depend on the statutory protection enacted to ensure basic working conditions. These employees are often not recruited into trade unions due to the precarious or temporary nature of their work fixed term employees are more inclined to depend on statutory protection enacted to ensure basic working conditions.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
Balancing the interests of employer and employee in dismissal for misconduct
- Pillay, Prushothman Subramoney
- Authors: Pillay, Prushothman Subramoney
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Labor discipline -- Law and legislation -- South Africa South Africa -- Employment Equity Act, 1998 South Africa -- Basic Conditions of Employment Act, 1997 South Africa -- Labour Relations Act, 1995 Unfair labor practices -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/34414 , vital:33375
- Description: South Africa emerged from a history dogged by an oppressive system in which race was used as a medium of oppression. Workers and in particular African workers’ rights were severely curtailed. However, following the advent of the Constitution, several employees’ rights and freedoms are now entrenched key amongst them in the right to fair labour practices is enshrined in section 23 (1) of the Constitution. Post 1994, South Africa adopted various new forms of labour legislation, including the Labour Relations Act. This marked the watershed in changing the balance of power away from the employer. The LRA gives form and content to the rights enshrined in the Constitution by establishing substantive and procedural requirements prior to dismissal. Equally important is the guidelines contained in schedule 8 to the LRA which depict an attempt by the legislature to ensure that employees are protected against unfair dismissal. The historical background of the employment relationship stems from the Master and Servant Act. The common law evolved in South Africa from Roman-Dutch and English practices. The common law was shaped against the backdrop of Apartheid modified to some extent through the Wiehahn Commission4 and more recently politically through union and National Economic Development and Labour Council (NEDLAC) involvement regulating labour practices through legislation. In South Africa, the employment relationship is regulated by three main sources of law. These include the Constitution, labour legislation and the law of contract. Besides these sources, South Africa is a member state of the International Labour Organisation.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Pillay, Prushothman Subramoney
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Employees -- Dismissal of -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Labor discipline -- Law and legislation -- South Africa South Africa -- Employment Equity Act, 1998 South Africa -- Basic Conditions of Employment Act, 1997 South Africa -- Labour Relations Act, 1995 Unfair labor practices -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/34414 , vital:33375
- Description: South Africa emerged from a history dogged by an oppressive system in which race was used as a medium of oppression. Workers and in particular African workers’ rights were severely curtailed. However, following the advent of the Constitution, several employees’ rights and freedoms are now entrenched key amongst them in the right to fair labour practices is enshrined in section 23 (1) of the Constitution. Post 1994, South Africa adopted various new forms of labour legislation, including the Labour Relations Act. This marked the watershed in changing the balance of power away from the employer. The LRA gives form and content to the rights enshrined in the Constitution by establishing substantive and procedural requirements prior to dismissal. Equally important is the guidelines contained in schedule 8 to the LRA which depict an attempt by the legislature to ensure that employees are protected against unfair dismissal. The historical background of the employment relationship stems from the Master and Servant Act. The common law evolved in South Africa from Roman-Dutch and English practices. The common law was shaped against the backdrop of Apartheid modified to some extent through the Wiehahn Commission4 and more recently politically through union and National Economic Development and Labour Council (NEDLAC) involvement regulating labour practices through legislation. In South Africa, the employment relationship is regulated by three main sources of law. These include the Constitution, labour legislation and the law of contract. Besides these sources, South Africa is a member state of the International Labour Organisation.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
Employee pension and provident fund rights
- Authors: Richard, Makhado Fhatuwani
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Pension funds -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Pension trusts -- South Africa Pensions -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/35156 , vital:33642
- Description: Ideally, every employee is required to retire at some stage in life. Some retire at a relatively early age, whilst others work for as long as is possible. The generally accepted retirement ages are 55, 60 or 65, but vary from company to company as stipulated in the specific company's provident or pension fund rules or policy. Once retired, an individual would rely on social insurance as a source of income in the form of pension or a provident fund. Social insurance, in this regard, refers to the earned benefits of employees and is often linked to formal employment. South Africa, as a middle-income developing country, has incorporated such elements into its social security system. The main aim of a pension or provident fund is to provide benefits for its members when they retire from employment, retrenched, unable to work due to illness and for family in the case a member dies while still working. These forms of social security are key to people’s survival and are referred to as safety nets. benefits. Participation on a voluntary basis by the self-employed is allowed but the take-up has been low Employees’ pension and provident rights under a pension or provident scheme do not arise only under the trusts of the scheme but also as contractual terms of the employment relationship between the employer and its employees. This often takes effect on the date of taking up employment, or on entering into an agreement with the employer. Employment law covers all rights and obligations within the employee employer relationship and covers a range of legal issues such as discrimination, wrongful termination, wages and taxation. Many of these issues are governed by the applicable law. Although the South African retirement fund system is in many respects financially sound and well regulated, several individuals still reach their retirement age with inadequate savings. This occurs for several reasons. For many people, during their working life, the build-up of savings is disrupted, or the costs associated with retirement fund provisioning are relatively high. This problem is not only grave for some workers in the formal sector, but largely for those in the rapidly increasing informal sector. Majority of people still lack effective access to an affordable retirement funding vehicle, for the most part, are completely excluded from social protection schemes, social insurance schemes. The South African retirement fund industry has been heavily influenced by a racially divided past and the parallel existence of developed and emerging components of the economy. In the past, racially discriminatory exclusion from the pension fund or provident fund membership was prevalent. In many cases it was indirect discrimination based on job categorisation, such as the distinction between weekly paid and monthly paid staff. Where the staff complement was racially stratified, people were excluded from membership on the grounds of race. Discrimination in the workplace can deny individuals opportunities and thereby deprive society of what those individuals can and could contribute. This has unfortunately been the case in South Africa’s history, the administration of pension and provident funds being one of many examples.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Richard, Makhado Fhatuwani
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Pension funds -- Law and legislation -- South Africa , Pension trusts -- South Africa Pensions -- South Africa
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/35156 , vital:33642
- Description: Ideally, every employee is required to retire at some stage in life. Some retire at a relatively early age, whilst others work for as long as is possible. The generally accepted retirement ages are 55, 60 or 65, but vary from company to company as stipulated in the specific company's provident or pension fund rules or policy. Once retired, an individual would rely on social insurance as a source of income in the form of pension or a provident fund. Social insurance, in this regard, refers to the earned benefits of employees and is often linked to formal employment. South Africa, as a middle-income developing country, has incorporated such elements into its social security system. The main aim of a pension or provident fund is to provide benefits for its members when they retire from employment, retrenched, unable to work due to illness and for family in the case a member dies while still working. These forms of social security are key to people’s survival and are referred to as safety nets. benefits. Participation on a voluntary basis by the self-employed is allowed but the take-up has been low Employees’ pension and provident rights under a pension or provident scheme do not arise only under the trusts of the scheme but also as contractual terms of the employment relationship between the employer and its employees. This often takes effect on the date of taking up employment, or on entering into an agreement with the employer. Employment law covers all rights and obligations within the employee employer relationship and covers a range of legal issues such as discrimination, wrongful termination, wages and taxation. Many of these issues are governed by the applicable law. Although the South African retirement fund system is in many respects financially sound and well regulated, several individuals still reach their retirement age with inadequate savings. This occurs for several reasons. For many people, during their working life, the build-up of savings is disrupted, or the costs associated with retirement fund provisioning are relatively high. This problem is not only grave for some workers in the formal sector, but largely for those in the rapidly increasing informal sector. Majority of people still lack effective access to an affordable retirement funding vehicle, for the most part, are completely excluded from social protection schemes, social insurance schemes. The South African retirement fund industry has been heavily influenced by a racially divided past and the parallel existence of developed and emerging components of the economy. In the past, racially discriminatory exclusion from the pension fund or provident fund membership was prevalent. In many cases it was indirect discrimination based on job categorisation, such as the distinction between weekly paid and monthly paid staff. Where the staff complement was racially stratified, people were excluded from membership on the grounds of race. Discrimination in the workplace can deny individuals opportunities and thereby deprive society of what those individuals can and could contribute. This has unfortunately been the case in South Africa’s history, the administration of pension and provident funds being one of many examples.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
The scope of environmental protection under the legal framework of the World Trade Organisation : an evaluation of the issues and implications for developing countries
- Authors: Umenze, Nnamdi Stanislaus
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Environmental protection -- Developing countries Environmental law -- Developing countries
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/10802 , vital:35762
- Description: Over the years, the extent to which the legal framework of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) makes provision for environmental protection has been a major issue within the organisation. While trade liberalisation and environmental protection are fundamental objectives of the WTO to be pursued in line with the sustainable development goals as enshrined in the Preamble of the Marrakesh Agreement, the organisation does not have a specific agreement on the environment. Moreover, efforts by the member states of the WTO to reform the environmental protection regime of the global trading system have achieved little. Nevertheless, under the current legal framework of the WTO, members are allowed, subject to a number of conditions, to adopt trade-related measures aimed at protecting the environment. Employing documentary research methodology, this study critically evaluates the relationship between trade and the environment, the provisions made for environmental protection in selected WTO agreements and the extent to which trade-related environmental protection measures are permissible under the legal framework of the WTO. It also evaluates the implications of unilateral and the Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEA)-based environmental trade measures as well as the possibility of a clash of policy objectives between the WTO Agreements and the MEAs, given that some of the MEAs contain environmental trade measures prohibited by the WTO free trade rules. The findings made in this study suggest that states generally prefer to enforce unilateral environmental trade measures against foreign goods. This has allowed states, in some instances, to hide under the guise of environmental protection to pursue protectionist’s interests, eco-imperialism, etc., leading to the trade and environment-related disputes at the WTO. Moreover, the WTO is made up of member states that are at different levels of development and possess different environmental protection standards. Hence, there is concern from developing countries, on the one hand, that their economic interests are being frustrated by the stringent application of unilateral environmental trade measures in the developed countries, and, on the other hand, that the environmental burden of international trade is being shifted to the developing countries as the developed countries tighten their environmental standards. The study concludes that the environmental protection regime of the WTO as it stands is not adequate to guarantee the balance of trade and environmental protection objectives as well as the balance of interests between the developed and developing countries. The study, therefore, recommends reform in the environmental protection regime of the WTO to ensure that the environmental protection measures are adequately provided for and that balance of interests between the developed and developing countries is maintained in order to ensure sustainable global trade. It further recommends that a mutually reinforcing relationship should be established between the WTO and the MEAs to avoid a possible clash of policy objectives.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Umenze, Nnamdi Stanislaus
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Environmental protection -- Developing countries Environmental law -- Developing countries
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10353/10802 , vital:35762
- Description: Over the years, the extent to which the legal framework of the World Trade Organisation (WTO) makes provision for environmental protection has been a major issue within the organisation. While trade liberalisation and environmental protection are fundamental objectives of the WTO to be pursued in line with the sustainable development goals as enshrined in the Preamble of the Marrakesh Agreement, the organisation does not have a specific agreement on the environment. Moreover, efforts by the member states of the WTO to reform the environmental protection regime of the global trading system have achieved little. Nevertheless, under the current legal framework of the WTO, members are allowed, subject to a number of conditions, to adopt trade-related measures aimed at protecting the environment. Employing documentary research methodology, this study critically evaluates the relationship between trade and the environment, the provisions made for environmental protection in selected WTO agreements and the extent to which trade-related environmental protection measures are permissible under the legal framework of the WTO. It also evaluates the implications of unilateral and the Multilateral Environmental Agreements (MEA)-based environmental trade measures as well as the possibility of a clash of policy objectives between the WTO Agreements and the MEAs, given that some of the MEAs contain environmental trade measures prohibited by the WTO free trade rules. The findings made in this study suggest that states generally prefer to enforce unilateral environmental trade measures against foreign goods. This has allowed states, in some instances, to hide under the guise of environmental protection to pursue protectionist’s interests, eco-imperialism, etc., leading to the trade and environment-related disputes at the WTO. Moreover, the WTO is made up of member states that are at different levels of development and possess different environmental protection standards. Hence, there is concern from developing countries, on the one hand, that their economic interests are being frustrated by the stringent application of unilateral environmental trade measures in the developed countries, and, on the other hand, that the environmental burden of international trade is being shifted to the developing countries as the developed countries tighten their environmental standards. The study concludes that the environmental protection regime of the WTO as it stands is not adequate to guarantee the balance of trade and environmental protection objectives as well as the balance of interests between the developed and developing countries. The study, therefore, recommends reform in the environmental protection regime of the WTO to ensure that the environmental protection measures are adequately provided for and that balance of interests between the developed and developing countries is maintained in order to ensure sustainable global trade. It further recommends that a mutually reinforcing relationship should be established between the WTO and the MEAs to avoid a possible clash of policy objectives.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
Ratifying the ILO convention no. 102 (social security minimum standards convention, 1952) by South Africa
- Authors: Xakaxa, Xoliswa
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Social security -- South Africa , Social security -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation, International
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/36452 , vital:33945
- Description: Twenty-three (23) years have elapsed since South Africa parted ways with the apartheid system. Nevertheless, poverty, inequality, and unemployment pose the greatest threat to human dignity and social cohesion. Section 27 (1) (c) of the Constitution obligates the state to develop a comprehensive social security system. It affirms the universal right to access social security, including appropriate social assistance for those unable to support themselves and their dependants. It orders the state to take reasonable legislative and other measures, within its available resources, to achieve the progressive realisation of these rights. The underlying normative commitment of social security is the improvement of the quality of life of the population by promoting economic or material equality. The study provides a general overview of the system of Social Security in South Africa as a Member State of the ILO. In particular, the study underscores that South Africa has not ratified ILO Convention No. 102 Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1952 and other Conventions relevant to Social Security. The study examines the need to ratify the said Convention in order to receive extensive coverage that would, among other benefits receive guarantees for a well-established system and thereby potentially reduce poverty. The Constitution is the supreme law of the country, it clearly stipulates that when interpreting, and applying the statutes international law must be considered. The study illuminates the significant benefits the country would receive from ratifying Convention No. 102.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Xakaxa, Xoliswa
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Social security -- South Africa , Social security -- Law and legislation -- South Africa Labor laws and legislation, International
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/36452 , vital:33945
- Description: Twenty-three (23) years have elapsed since South Africa parted ways with the apartheid system. Nevertheless, poverty, inequality, and unemployment pose the greatest threat to human dignity and social cohesion. Section 27 (1) (c) of the Constitution obligates the state to develop a comprehensive social security system. It affirms the universal right to access social security, including appropriate social assistance for those unable to support themselves and their dependants. It orders the state to take reasonable legislative and other measures, within its available resources, to achieve the progressive realisation of these rights. The underlying normative commitment of social security is the improvement of the quality of life of the population by promoting economic or material equality. The study provides a general overview of the system of Social Security in South Africa as a Member State of the ILO. In particular, the study underscores that South Africa has not ratified ILO Convention No. 102 Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1952 and other Conventions relevant to Social Security. The study examines the need to ratify the said Convention in order to receive extensive coverage that would, among other benefits receive guarantees for a well-established system and thereby potentially reduce poverty. The Constitution is the supreme law of the country, it clearly stipulates that when interpreting, and applying the statutes international law must be considered. The study illuminates the significant benefits the country would receive from ratifying Convention No. 102.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
Regulating essential services, maintenance services and minimum services agreements
- Authors: Zama, Ntokozo Patrick
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Collective labor agreements
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/21582 , vital:29637
- Description: South Africa has in the recent past seen employees embarking in strike action, even in sectors designated as essential services. The impact adversely affected inter alia economic growth, investor confidence, international credit ratings and the high rate of unemployment. The Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 from its inception on 11 November 1996, and as amended, in 2002 and in 2015, has brought about some minor changes to the model aimed at regulating essential services, maintenance services and minimum services agreements. This research is aimed at investigating; whether essential services, maintenance services and minimum services agreements are designed to unjustifiably limit the right to strike or not. The Constitution1 and the Labour Relations Act, 19952 encourages parties in employment relationship to engage in collective bargaining. Mechanisms such as a no duty to bargain envisaged within the current LRA regulatory framework, appears to be undermining the significance of ensuring that parties engaged within services designated as essential and maintenance services exercise their fundamental right to strike and to bargain collectively. The Essential Services Committee when dispensing with its statutory functions may be unjustifiably limiting the right to strike for employees engaged in essential and maintenance services. Some employers may be to some degree reluctant to trigger maintenance services provisions as the LRA appears to be adopting a voluntarism principle when regulating collective bargaining, as the Act is encouraging employers to deal with the provision of maintenance services within collective agreements. An introduction of a judiciable enforceable duty to bargain collectively in services designated as essential and maintenance services may compel employers to conclude minimum services agreements. The extremely low number of services designated as maintenance services is a worrying reality and the solution is urgently required.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018
- Authors: Zama, Ntokozo Patrick
- Date: 2018
- Subjects: Collective labor agreements
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , LLM
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10948/21582 , vital:29637
- Description: South Africa has in the recent past seen employees embarking in strike action, even in sectors designated as essential services. The impact adversely affected inter alia economic growth, investor confidence, international credit ratings and the high rate of unemployment. The Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 from its inception on 11 November 1996, and as amended, in 2002 and in 2015, has brought about some minor changes to the model aimed at regulating essential services, maintenance services and minimum services agreements. This research is aimed at investigating; whether essential services, maintenance services and minimum services agreements are designed to unjustifiably limit the right to strike or not. The Constitution1 and the Labour Relations Act, 19952 encourages parties in employment relationship to engage in collective bargaining. Mechanisms such as a no duty to bargain envisaged within the current LRA regulatory framework, appears to be undermining the significance of ensuring that parties engaged within services designated as essential and maintenance services exercise their fundamental right to strike and to bargain collectively. The Essential Services Committee when dispensing with its statutory functions may be unjustifiably limiting the right to strike for employees engaged in essential and maintenance services. Some employers may be to some degree reluctant to trigger maintenance services provisions as the LRA appears to be adopting a voluntarism principle when regulating collective bargaining, as the Act is encouraging employers to deal with the provision of maintenance services within collective agreements. An introduction of a judiciable enforceable duty to bargain collectively in services designated as essential and maintenance services may compel employers to conclude minimum services agreements. The extremely low number of services designated as maintenance services is a worrying reality and the solution is urgently required.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2018